IF someone is not a One God, Jesus Name Baptisim, HOly Ghost filled with evidence of speaking in Tongues, living a seperated life of consecration to God christian... they can still be saved.
Trinitarians can remain trinitarians and still go to Heaven.
Tounges is not the intial sign of the Holy Ghost
Baptisim isn't as important to be Jesus name only.
Jesus may not be God, possibly a second...
Appearance doesn't matter to God
Its not a sin for women to:
Cut their hair
Wear Pants
Jewelry
Make-Up
did I miss anything?
An yet they still insist they are Apostolic.
This post is true for many that post here... I don't see any doubt of that...
Geeze - a bit touchy eh? Yeah he brought it up but not in a negative way. I know there are MANY MANY threads on here for those of you who choose to bash celebrating Christmas. It does not make you oucasts - just someone with a different opinion than mine.
makes us more holy.
__________________
Today pull up the little weeds,
The sinful thoughts subdue,
Or they will take the reins themselves
And someday master you. --Anon.
The most deadly sins do not leap upon us, they creep up on us.
mrnbcox, I think some, you included, have learned they really cannot answer Ezek 16 when God considered it giving jewelry to His bride.
__________________ ...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
I am not sure if the thought you put forward here is your thought of if you are simply forwarding the thoughts of others that have argued this point...
But...
I find that to be one of the most interesting explanations I have ever heard.
If I understand it correctly the point being put forward is that God is using something he considers to be sin to demonstrate metaphorically what he would do for his very own bride.
I am not sure if the thought you put forward here is your thought of if you are simply forwarding the thoughts of others that have argued this point...
But...
I find that to be one of the most interesting explanations I have ever heard.
If I understand it correctly the point being put forward is that God is using something he considers to be sin to demonstrate metaphorically what he would do for his very own bride.
Man... that is one interesting thought there.
That was the argument used on the thread.... it's just a metaphor.
I agree with you - interesting that God would deck his bride with something he considers sinful.