How did AFF go Lib under Conservative Leadership?

[Jehoram]

How do you ignore it?

Some posters follow others around and act like a bunch of silly school children.

They run in packs.

The minute they see a new post from a target, they explode with a flood of harrassment.

[TRFrance]

Originally Posted by StMark

I am now under the impression that Steadfast and Boomm wanted this to be a conservative apostolic forum only??? just asking

I don't know what would give you that impression. I think that would be an unfair characterization of them. From what I can see, they've given the libs wide latitude here (some might even say too much).

If they were looking to make this a conservative apostolic forum only, there are a bunch of people that would have/could have been banned a long time ago.

[StMark]

Originally Posted by My Own Eyes

I guess with Mark its hard to tell. I thought this was what he actually believed.

Rebellion is what will send us to hell. And disobedience to those in biblical authority.

[Amos]

Originally Posted by Jeanie

Couldn't just ignore it? IDK just a thought-

Sure, I can.

But you have to ask yourself after a while, why bother?

Where is the fun if you can't post without being gang tackled by a bunch of hyenas who have no real interest in civil discourse?

When it isn't fun anymore, it's time to vamoose.

[BrotherEastman]

Originally Posted by StMark

Rebellion is what will send us to hell. And disobedience to those in biblical authority.

Yer a glutton fer punishment, aintcha?

[BrotherEastman]

Originally Posted by Jeanie

Couldn't just ignore it? IDK just a thought-

Ignore it? Are you for real? Who ignores stuff around here?

[StMark]

Originally Posted by Amos

Excellent post.

Being heckled by rude, obnoxious, arrogant, and mocking voices gets old.

was this the norm or was it just a few ? when the main one banned,most of the cons still wouldn't come back. why is that?
I do agree that some just carried it way too far.I guess i'm the wrong one to say that since I too carried things too far in a different way. There were people that threatend to leave if i wasn't banned so Flemming eventually got rid of me.

[Amos]

Originally Posted by StMark

was this the norm or was it just a few ? when the main one banned,most of the cons still wouldn't come back. why is that?
I do agree that some just carried it way too far.I guess i'm the wrong one to say that since I too carried things too far in a different way. There were people that threatend to leave if i wasn't banned so Flemming eventually got rid of me.

It doesn't take too many if they are prolific enough.

[ForeverBlessed]

Originally Posted by StMark

You wear pants and cut your hair lisa
I would have never brought that up but you said so
on the forum yourself. this places you at risk of not
only being a liberal but risking your soul

I don't wear pants as every day attire... and I only cut my hair when I am not participating in platform ministry... and it is mid back, which I consider long.

Believe me Mark, there are many tithe paying members of my church far more liberal than I. This is a fairly moderate state... not California.

My soul is not at risk dear.

[StMark]

Originally Posted by TRFrance

I don't know what would give you that impression. I think that would be an unfair characterization of them. From what I can see, they've given the libs wide latitude here (some might even say too much).

If they were looking to make this a conservative apostolic forum only, there are a bunch of people that would have/could have been banned a long time ago.

well as i recall, Matt banned Atlanta Bishop for promoting false doctrine.

again, there were 3 conservative owners and one charismatic. I still think that if the cons were the dominant power, this shouldn't have happend