Seconds of Pre Embryonic Life of Jesus Christ?

[Evang.Benincasa]

http://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com...8&postcount=71

Here is a testimony from someone who had the misfortune of dealing with Sean's delusions.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Truthseeker71

We read what you write Sean. Try harder to be honest when representing men whom you have called "brother" and "friend" in the past. It's not really a "win" if you have to cheat.

Isn't that the Truth.

Too bad Sean will NEVER learn that.

[Esaias]

"Or, did God speak a sperm cell into existence(son of God) to mate with Mary's egg(son of man)?"

If the sperm cell was the son of God, then Jesus is his own father? He impregnated His own mother?

The more Sean types, the more bizarre he gets.

[Esaias]

This Pakistani Muslim knows more about the birth of Jesus than Sean does?

[Esaias]

This Pakistani Muslim knows more about the birth of Jesus than Sean does?

[Sean]

Originally Posted by Esaias

"Or, did God speak a sperm cell into existence(son of God) to mate with Mary's egg(son of man)?"

If the sperm cell was the son of God, then Jesus is his own father? He impregnated His own mother?

The more Sean types, the more bizarre he gets.

The sperm cell was made a man(son of God/son of man).

It is you that think the sperm cell was God(God the son).

It is you that teach that Mary's God, Jesus, was born to Mary.

It is you that teach that Mary birthed her God(The Father).

Now can you see your Catholic brethren?



Again, your Catholic brethren teach God the Son.

You teach God the son.(Father IS Jesus)

[Sean]

Originally Posted by Sean

Right, so the Spirit was made flesh?

If so, how?

Was the Spirit of God made a sperm cell(flesh) to mate with Mary's egg(flesh)?


Or, was the fully developed Spirit/flesh implanted into Mary's womb?


Or, did God speak a sperm cell into existence(son of God) to mate with Mary's egg(son of man)?


I pick the 3rd option, howbout you?

Since DB wanted all to see this.

Which do you believe?

[Sean]

Every time modern oneness believers see "son of God", they translate it in their heads, "God the son".(Father is son).

[Sean]

This is how close it is between trin H/U's and oneness H/U's.....


Trins think, God the Son(Jesus has the H/U part of the 2nd person in the trinity).

Oneness thinks, God the son(The Father is the son, as the Father took on H/U).


Both teach the Spirit was made flesh.

Both teach that Mary gave birth to God.

Both teach that God was crucified and rose from the grave.

Both deny that Jesus had a God after the resurrection, no matter how many verses say he does.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Sean

Right, so the Spirit was made flesh?

If so, how?

Was the Spirit of God made a sperm cell(flesh) to mate with Mary's egg(flesh)?


Or, was the fully developed Spirit/flesh implanted into Mary's womb?


Or, did God speak a sperm cell into existence(son of God) to mate with Mary's egg(son of man)?


I pick the 3rd option, howbout you?

You are missing the point as usual. You always switch the issue. You have to ADD to the bible to make your point. I am just using what the bible said alone.

GOD was the word and GOD was made flesh. You claim he was not God until the resurrection. But John 1 says He was GOD since HIS BiRTH. Who cares about cells and eggs? IT IS the words John used. Stick with those words. Stick with biblical terms. We just read of FLESH and GOD and WORD. And the Word is GOD. And the word became flesh. So God became flesh. And that was at the beginning.... not the end of his life.