Does the golden rule save without the cross? - Page 15

shazeep · #**141** 09-06-2016, 07:24 AM

ok well i'm not sure how you get to "Love is for the confused" etc from there, and you guys seem intent upon reassuring yourselves that everyone else is lost rather than any self examination, which i get is not the most comfortable thing in the world, so i'll just leave you to contemplate how 'mike drop' and overweening pride go together. Maybe when you lose 10 or 20 more million you'll be willing to have a conversation.

mfblume · #**142** 09-06-2016, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shazeep

ok well i'm not sure how you get to "Love is for the confused" etc from there,

See, now this is an example of your lies. We do not believe "love is for the confused." Now you have to repent over that as well.

Quote:

and you guys seem intent upon reassuring yourselves that everyone else is lost rather than any self examination, which i get is not the most comfortable thing in the world, so i'll just leave you to contemplate how 'mike drop' and overweening pride go together. Maybe when you lose 10 or 20 more million you'll be willing to have a conversation.

Why you think head counts are a concern in contrast to people hearing truth, we'll never know.

However, it's disingenuous of you, adding to the list of racked up lies, saying we seek to assure ourselves everyone else is lost. We seek to show the world why people are lost, as the bible explains, how the bible explains they can be saved. We were lost, too, but the message we heard from the bible is what we seek to share with others. You have a weird way of twisting that into seeking to assure ourselves we are saved apart from everyone else. But I guess that's what snakes do, anyway.

Think of it this way. You have a way to determine if you are saved or not. Using your method on the forum, you believe everyone else is lost who disagrees with you, or else you would not believe it is what's right for you to be saved.

So you lied about pride, you lied about love being for the confused, and you lied about us thinking people have to agree with our personal view rather than the truth of us believing people have to believe the bible.

You asked for the list of lifes. You gave three of them right here.

Easier to continue lying than to actually deal with your alleged accusations and our responses to them, though I see.

And THAT is the real pride here. Not willing to admit you lied.

We feel no pride in thinking we're saved and those who disbelieve the bible are lost. We feel sad and hurt, and wish for them to be saved.

Anyway, I noticed you wanted to know what it means to accept the cross, and I explained it....shortly after you asked. SO, WHERE IS YOUR RESPONSE to that direct post, with detailed reasons for it?

shazeep · #**143** 09-07-2016, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume

See, now this is an example of your lies. We do not believe "love is for the confused."

ok, not sure who "we" is, but that is a quote, from you. Are you saying that you have forgotten you said it, and i need to go dig it up, or would you amend this now, Sheldon, or what? Am i taking you too seriously or something? Because i have the impression now that maybe you are trying to make jokes, so i apologize if i am misreading your intentions here.

Esaias · #**144** 09-07-2016, 01:22 PM

Shaz, serious question. Do you toke?

YounginHope · #**145** 09-07-2016, 02:06 PM

Lol, this is how it starts. One guy confesses and rats the rest of us out! Lolo I say

houston · #**146** 09-08-2016, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esaias

Shaz, serious question. Do you toke?

bath salts...

shazeep · #**147** 09-08-2016, 06:26 AM

Why you think head counts are a concern in contrast to people hearing truth, we'll never know.

well, we already know, it is Scriptural, and you have just forgotten, like you forgot your quote, prolly. But i guess the correct response here is "you need to work on your jokes." See you guys.

mfblume · #**148** 09-08-2016, 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shazeep

ok, not sure who "we" is, but that is a quote, from you. Are you saying that you have forgotten you said it, and i need to go dig it up, or would you amend this now, Sheldon, or what? Am i taking you too seriously or something? Because i have the impression now that maybe you are trying to make jokes, so i apologize if i am misreading your intentions here.

I am making no jokes. I know what I believe and I responds to you and anyone else accordingly. And I do not believe love is for the confused. So, yes, dig it up, because whatever I said I never meant what you obviously think I did.

mfblume · #**149** 09-08-2016, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shazeep

Why you think head counts are a concern in contrast to people hearing truth, we'll never know.

well, we already know, it is Scriptural, and you have just forgotten, like you forgot your quote, prolly. But i guess the correct response here is "you need to work on your jokes." See you guys.

Typical, always running when pinned down to make good for your accusations.

Yes, you need to quote what you're responding to. For goodness' sake, in one page you respond to something with the quote right near you and you don't quote it. And learn to format, because putting things in italics alone is shoddy.

Here: learn something.

When you quote something, simply type these characters before the quote, and leave out the spaces, since if I did it without spaces as it should be, it would not show it on your screen. .... [ q u o t e ]

And at the end of your quote type this: [ / q u o t e ]

Evang.Benincasa · #**150** 09-10-2016, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esaias

Shaz, serious question. Do you toke?

Shaz's Sunday school class.