The Reason Some Apostolics Are Concerned: The Results of Erased Lines

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Well AB and ILG .... the ultracons are mounting an offensive today .... tactics are stale and old ... but entertaining none the less.

Once again, a 'drive by' posting with no genuine argument for accepting the trinitarian doctrine.



'Stale' and 'old'... ? 'Stale' like lacking change and 'old' like the truth about Oneness? Jesus Name baptism? Perhaps you should remember that 'stale' and 'old' aren't a detriment when it's still 'truth'.

[ThePastorsCoach]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Laugh all you want. But your tacit acceptance of trinitarianism says more than anything you could ever type on AFF.

I do not accept trinitarianism. I have never preached it or accepted it. I was born and raised in a "trinity" organization, went to Bible College in a "trinitarian" school and never did hear it preached or taught and did not preach it myself. Just because I love people and accept people does not mean I accept everything you THINK they believe.

NOR do I accept the Hall/Bernard version of "ONENESS" of which was derived from what was originally called - The Revelation of Jesus Christ.

Is there anybody on this forum that REMEMBERS the preaching of THE REVELATION OF JESUS CHRIST and not this watered down bible school version and Pentecostal denominational indoctrination of "The Oneness Doctrine"? ANYONE???????

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

So "ultracon" is now defined as adherance to Oneness doctrine?

Sheesh, paint me conservative.

Welcome to the ranks...

[ILG]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Well AB and ILG .... the ultracons are mounting an offensive today .... tactics are stale and old ... but entertaining none the less.

The equation Steadfast is proposing is that Loosening of standards=Acceptance of trinitarianism. He has not shown this to be accurate in any way other than "It has happened before!!" Well, so have trinitarians held to standards.....etc. etc. etc.

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by Steadfast

Once again, a 'drive by' posting with no genuine argument for accepting the trinitarian doctrine.



'Stale' and 'old'... ? 'Stale' like lacking change and 'old' like the truth about Oneness? Jesus Name baptism? Perhaps you should remember that 'stale' and 'old' aren't a detriment when it's still 'truth'.

It would be much easier if these guys would just go ahead and say they are trinitarian instead of beating around the bush. I mean, what is to be embarrassed about if that is your belief?

Are they afraid of something?

Originally Posted by ILG

Okay....well.....explain to me how completely unrelated issues such as the God head and television have anything to do with each other.

If moving away from a standard can cause exceptance of trinitarianism, what will keep people from accepting it?? Holding the line?? There are many PCI'ers in the UPCI that "hold the line" standards-wise that might be somewhat open to trinitarian fellowship. There are some hardline 3-steppers that are for advertising on television. Maybe getting more conservative will keep people from accepting trinitarianism??? How about no advertising in the newspaper??

Steadfast....SHOW me how a stand on a standard can CAUSE anybody to accept or reject trinitaranism.

Originally Posted by Steadfast

ILG, look around you friend. There is a whole lot of your 'maybe' posting on this forum that think trinitarian belief is acceptable.

The point that I make is honest and true: SOME people don't know when to stop erasing lines once they start. That is a fact that cannot be denied.

Once again...

[mizpeh]

Originally Posted by AtlantaBishop

NOR do I accept the Hall/Bernard version of "ONENESS" of which was derived from what was originally called - The Revelation of Jesus Christ.

Is there anybody on this forum that REMEMBERS the preaching of THE REVELATION OF JESUS CHRIST and not this watered down bible school version and Pentecostal denominational indoctrination of "The Oneness Doctrine"? ANYONE???????

I'd like to hear your version of it.

[ILG]

Originally Posted by Steadfast

I don't trust ANYBODY with truth who doesn't believe the doctrine.



I think this post encapsulates the last line of what Pianoman said above. Great posts in my opinion.

How foolish would we be to say, "I love truth more than anything but not enough to keep false doctrine out of my pulpit." That would be the ultimate mixed signal.

I agree that is somebody preaches a hardline 3 step that if they have a trinitarian in their pulpti they are going <---------------------->

That-away

Either you is or you ain't.

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by Steadfast

Welcome to the ranks...

Who'd a thunk it?

Folks, I have a hospital call with someone near death... I'll catch up later.