Donald Trump 666 to usher in the Mark of the Beast

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Esaias

What definitions are you taking issue with? Cite some examples, please.

Yes, Sean tell us.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Sean

They are still trying to figure out ancient languages. They are partially right with their definitions, but no way, exactly right.

One, who are "they?"

Please provide evidence of how "they" are still trying to figure out "ancient languages" Is Beowulf translation incorrect? Where is it incorrect, please explain. The Egyptian book of the Dead, what portions are incorrect? How is it only partially right, and where is it not exactly right?

Originally Posted by Sean

Blind faith in them would be needed to think they know exactly what ancient languages were saying.

Wow.

[Sean]

If you believe the modern scholar's exactness, I won't try to stop you, I am just saying I don't trust them.

Their sources start somewhere in the past.

Just like the majority of scholar's I discuss evolution with.....their sources began in the 1800s.

I can't help but point it out.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Sean

If you believe the modern scholar's exactness, I won't try to stop you, I am just saying I don't trust them.

Sean, I asked you if the ancient Egyptian could be understood by those who study the language. I asked you if the poem Beowulf was exact? If not, then how do you know? If you don't trust something you would have to be able to produce evidence to others so we also can come to the same conclusion as you. If you just have a feeling, then that's all on you. You could have a feeling that pink elves live under the hood of your car. Yet, if you can't provide us tangible evidence, then don't expect us to believe you.

Originally Posted by Sean

Their sources start somewhere in the past.

Their sources? Who are these people, and what exactly are their sources?

Somewhere in the past? Past when? 1969, 1492? Sean, you aren't saying anything.

Originally Posted by Sean

Just like the majority of scholar's I discuss evolution with.....their sources began in the 1800s.

Majority of scholars???? Oh my God, what are you talking about????

Originally Posted by Sean

I can't help but point it out.

Point out what?

Sean, what exactly are you pointing out? You are only giving your opinion. Nothing more. Esaias asked you some questions which need you to produce some evidence. Not just your feelings, but evidence which would prove that your accusations hold merit.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Sean

If you believe the modern scholar's exactness, I won't try to stop you, I am just saying I don't trust them.

Their sources start somewhere in the past.

Just like the majority of scholar's I discuss evolution with.....their sources began in the 1800s.

I can't help but point it out.

What definitions are you taking issue with? Examples, please?

And, please answer my questions concerning the AV 1611 translators: how did they know the correct definitions for the Greek, Hebrew, etc?

Thanks!

[Evang.Benincasa]

This is neat, this topic with Sean, is like a crucifix to Dracula.

[Esaias]

Hello? Sean?

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

This is neat, this topic with Sean, is like a crucifix to Dracula.

Obviously the repeal of net neutrality has interfered with his access to Google?

[mfblume]

Dispensationalism started in the 1800's, too. Lol

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Obviously the repeal of net neutrality has interfered with his access to Google?

That is hysterical.