(( Would You File Charges on this Holiness Cop? ))

[KWSS1976]

El predit stop dodging me please and answer my question I asked please

[KWSS1976]

And I or probley anyone else sees nothing funny about the Kim commit EL pred.......

[Encryptus]

Renda has made a great point Kim, if the liberals win the BDWs will start wearing leotards to church.

(Sorry did we ever determine if that term was pc for this forum?)

LOL

[moniker]

Originally Posted by El Predicador

There is a time and season to everything, by your logic a prosecutor could not prosecute pornography because he could not look at it because it is illegal per se. Fallacious reasoning.

Once again time, place and circumstance: A private forum, for preachers, to discuss whether something should be constituted immodest.

You also apparently may have trouble distinguishing between immodest and either obscene or depraved immorality.

Originally Posted by El Predicador

I am happy you are the man of your household and such discussions occur.

In the case at hand, it is a group of ministers on what they perceived to be a private forum discussing the issue of how their denominational stand on holiness should best be presented vis a vis their annual Campmeeting.

Surely you would not be suggesting there is something wrong with that?

Originally Posted by El Predicador

Dear Brother, Sister or Confused Kim,

These men were having a private discussion about how they wanted their denomination to be presented at Campmeeting.

Your last paragraph is not worth comment since it is obvious you would have no problem with the Sports Illustrated bikini models showing their wares at your church. If it doesn't instantly send to hell on the spot anything goes right?

You keep bringing up the words private forum and private discussion as if those are valid excuses to take such pictures and post them for leering, perverted eyes to see. Sounds like your private forum is more of a gentlemen's club.

What possesses a man to take the pics, and what possesses him to share them? Motivation is the key here.

There is no valid reason to do either, and that is why I sincerely believe the man is just (edited). If he is licensed, he should be censured.

[El Predicador]

Originally Posted by moniker

You keep bringing up the words private forum and private discussion You left out private MINISTERS forum as if those are valid excuses to take such pictures and post them for leering, perverted eyes to see. There is no valid reason to do either, and that is why I sincerely believe the man is just perverted. If he is licensed, he should be censured.

Really, really sounds like you are the one with SERIOUS issues.

[moniker]

Originally Posted by El Predicador

Really, really sounds like you are the one with SERIOUS issues.

Sure, now run along and go back to your private minister's forum and look at some more girly pics, okay?

[moniker]

Aren't these the same guys that posted a picture of Stephanie Suber so that they could inspect her body to determine how unholy she was?

[El Predicador]

Originally Posted by moniker

Sure, now run along and go back to your private minister's forum and look at some more girly pics, okay?

Actually at this point I shall simply retire from this conversation and pray for your soul.

[moniker]

Originally Posted by El Predicador

Actually at this point I shall simply retire from this conversation and pray for your soul.

Awesome, and I will pray God delivers your private minister's forum from gossip, slander and perversion.

[James Griffin]

Originally Posted by Rhoni

Jim,

I am sorry. I thought it showed faces. If you can't clearly identify it would stand to reason. Thanks for clarifying.

Blessings, Rhoni

No prob Rhoni, I did not even notice you had posted, I was agreeing with Art, not disagreeing with you. :-)