|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
02-23-2007, 02:58 PM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by keith4him
As having fellowshipped with him one time, I am not an expert on Leon's doctrinal views, but having some knowledge of his background, I think he doesn't know what the word Triune means? I could be wrong but would hate to.
I would have preferred he used the three in one God.
|
Why the aversion to triune or triunity ... Interesting to note that Andrew Urshan, father of Nathaniel Urshan, objected to the use of the term "oneness" preferring to describe God as a "tri-unity" or "Three-One God" in his book: The Almighty God in the Lord Jesus Christ, (pgs 6,42,78,93) or : The Blessed Three-ness of the Godhead. WG 4 (July 1923), 2-4.
|
02-23-2007, 03:10 PM
|
|
Saved & Shaved
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 10,795
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
Why the aversion to triune or triunity ... Interesting to note that Andrew Urshan, father of Nathaniel Urshan, objected to the use of the term "oneness" preferring to describe God as a "tri-unity" or "Three-One God" in his book: The Almighty God in the Lord Jesus Christ, (pgs 6,42,78,93) or : The Blessed Three-ness of the Godhead. WG 4 (July 1923), 2-4.
|
Take that stuff to the PCI thread 
|
02-23-2007, 03:14 PM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berkeley
Take that stuff to the PCI thread |
Ama smack ju upside yo head ... punk .....
|
02-23-2007, 04:31 PM
|
 |
Follower of Jesus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,275
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
Why the aversion to triune or triunity ... Interesting to note that Andrew Urshan, father of Nathaniel Urshan, objected to the use of the term "oneness" preferring to describe God as a "tri-unity" or "Three-One God" in his book: The Almighty God in the Lord Jesus Christ, (pgs 6,42,78,93) or : The Blessed Three-ness of the Godhead. WG 4 (July 1923), 2-4.
|
Because in my mind the tri-unity is often understood either correctly or incorrectly as trinitarian, but the three in one is more in line with oneness theology.
|
02-23-2007, 05:13 PM
|
|
Saved & Shaved
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 10,795
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by keith4him
Because in my mind the tri-unity is often understood either correctly or incorrectly as trinitarian, but the three in one is more in line with oneness theology.
|
yep
|
02-23-2007, 06:04 PM
|
|
|
|
three in one is Oneness? Where does the three come in? Why would we let the polytheistic dictations determine how we view the beauty of the Great King we serve?
|
02-23-2007, 06:28 PM
|
|
Saved & Shaved
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 10,795
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammondb3klingon1
three in one is Oneness? Where does the three come in? Why would we let the polytheistic dictations determine how we view the beauty of the Great King we serve?
|
3 manifestations of the one God!! geeze, ur slow (tic)
S'all I heard when I got into church.. "3 in 1... 3 in 1... 3 in 1..."
Anyway, "one" in "..the Lord our God is one.." is "echad" one of essence.
Trinitarians argue that if the writer intended to pen that God is one in number,
he would have used "yachid." One in number. *shrugs*
|
02-23-2007, 08:47 PM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,791
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
Why the aversion to triune or triunity ... Interesting to note that Andrew Urshan, father of Nathaniel Urshan, objected to the use of the term "oneness" preferring to describe God as a "tri-unity" or "Three-One God" in his book: The Almighty God in the Lord Jesus Christ, (pgs 6,42,78,93) or : The Blessed Three-ness of the Godhead. WG 4 (July 1923), 2-4.
|
Did he literally say he rejected that term or did he just use the term Triunity a lot?
Perhaps a reason was "Oneness" might sound like Unitarianism and Modalism is considered historically to be a Trinitarian heresy (by Trinitarians) also called Economic Trinitarianism.
|
02-23-2007, 08:48 PM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
|
|
|
Prax ... objected ... is less absolute ...
|
02-23-2007, 08:49 PM
|
|
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,791
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammondb3klingon1
three in one is Oneness? Where does the three come in? Why would we let the polytheistic dictations determine how we view the beauty of the Great King we serve?
|
Three modes or manifestations. Oneness has always taught that there are three, they just deny there are three persons.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:39 AM.
| |
Linear Mode
