Bundy Ranch, BLM, Harry Reid and the Chinese

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
Will anyone please attempt to REFUTE the stated facts of this case?

(1) The law (in question) is clear,

(2) the cattle was taken legally by court order,

(3) bundy supporters came from many states,

(4) many of them armed,

(5) and they were strategizing their use of deadly force against legitimate law enforcement officers.

(6) Part of their strategizing included the use of snipers and the placement of women in what they thought would be the primary line of fire.

(7) The bozo bundy supporters purposefully disrupted legitimate law enforcement operations-- these people were the thugs in this case.

(8) The Feds backed down, to their credit, to avoid a situation that was clearly headed towards bloody violence.

(9) Yes, many of the bozo bundy supporters are members of extreme right-winged militia groups.

(10) Yes, many of the people who participate in those types of groups are racists.

(11) Yes, former Sheriff Mack has collaborated with a noted white supremacist in the recent past.

(12) Yes, Timothy McVeigh had A LOT in common with many of bozo bundy supporters.



No one dares to refute the truth.

Tell me none of this is true-- just bring your proof.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Vigilante snipers aimed at LEO's!

Women DELIBERATELY placed in the line of fire!


Why am I not ok with any of this!?

There is a right way and a wrong way to go about doing things.

bundy and his clowns are wrong.

Richard Mack, a former Arizona sheriff, said that is was a tactical ploy on his part. He didn't realize the women had already decided to go out front. It was something the women just did. It was THEIR choice. So, stop over-dramatizing something the women strategized about privately.

Was there a right or wrong way to handle the Boston Tea Party, dressing up like Indians and dumping tea into the harbor as a protest? We are back fighting against a tyrannical government and you are on the government's side. How sad to know that about you.

That's the larger issue and I am done arguing with you about it.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Richard Mack, a former Arizona sheriff, said that is was a tactical ploy on his part. He didn't realize the women had already decided to go out front. It was something the women just did. It was THEIR choice. So, stop over-dramatizing something the women strategized about privately.

Was there a right or wrong way to handle the Boston Tea Party, dressing up like Indians and dumping tea into the harbor as a protest? We are back fighting against a tyrannical government and you are on the government's side. How sad to know that about you.

That's the larger issue and I am done arguing with you about it.

So it is ok to be on the side of law enforcement in some cases, to give the law enforcement the benefit of doubt in our "urban" areas, but out in the country with a rebellious rancher who goes 20 YEARS without paying what is due to the government, law enforcement is wrong to go and enforce a court order and it is ok to plot the murder of those LEO's!


Hypocrisy...

[Pressing-On]

BLM Eyes 90,000 Acres of Texas Land

After the recent Bundy Ranch episode by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Texans are becoming more concerned about the BLM’s focus on 90,000 acres along a 116 mile stretch of the Texas/Oklahoma boundary. The BLM is reviewing the possible federal takeover and ownership of privately-held lands which have been deeded property for generations of Texas landowners.

...the BLM is going through a scoping period where they are gathering facts on land whose ownership they believe to be in question in Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas. The BLM is in the process of developing a Resource Management Plan. The plan will cover a total of 411,585 square miles, or 263 million acres of land.

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-T...medium=twitter

[Jermyn Davidson]

Even if bundy was somehow morally right (which he isn't), civil disobedience is one thing.

This is not a situation of mere civil disobedience.

[Pressing-On]

Bundy Family Posts Photo Of Dead Cow Euthanized By BLM






http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2...hanized-By-BLM

[Jermyn Davidson]

Eminent Domain issues are sticky, but if we don't like the laws, we the people change the laws.

We don't decide to simply not obey the laws and then plot to kill the law enforcement officers who are doing their sworn duties.

[Pressing-On]

Now, even PETA is getting involved.


PETA Hits BLM Over Mass Cattle Grave
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...s-Cattle-Grave

[Jermyn Davidson]

Had bundy simply complied with the laws, his cows wouldn't have died.

His cow deaths are his fault.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Will anyone please attempt to REFUTE the stated facts of this case?

(1) The law (in question) is clear,

(2) the cattle was taken legally by court order,

(3) bundy supporters came from many states,

(4) many of them armed,

(5) and they were strategizing their use of deadly force against legitimate law enforcement officers.

(6) Part of their strategizing included the use of snipers and the placement of women in what they thought would be the primary line of fire.

(7) The bozo bundy supporters purposefully disrupted legitimate law enforcement operations-- these people were the thugs in this case.

(8) The Feds backed down, to their credit, to avoid a situation that was clearly headed towards bloody violence.

(9) Yes, many of the bozo bundy supporters are members of extreme right-winged militia groups.

(10) Yes, many of the people who participate in those types of groups are racists.

(11) Yes, former Sheriff Mack has collaborated with a noted white supremacist in the recent past.

(12) Yes, Timothy McVeigh had A LOT in common with many of bozo bundy supporters.



No one dares to refute the truth.