No prosecution for Trump's campaign manager

[Originalist]

http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/13/politi...ped/index.html

[n david]

Looks like the process worked. The police did their job with the charge and the prosecutor did her job judging whether or not it could be prosecuted.

He's a loser. Lost in his run for office and failed as campaign manager with two other campaigns, including an incumbent. You have to be pretty bad to make an incumbent lose.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

Looks like the process worked. The police did their job with the charge and the prosecutor did her job judging whether or not it could be prosecuted.

He's a loser. Lost in his run for office and failed as campaign manager with two other campaigns, including an incumbent. You have to be pretty bad to make an incumbent lose.

Actually, he is a survivor who withstood unjustified and withering assaults on his character from people just like you.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

Actually, he is a survivor who withstood unjustified and withering assaults on his character from people just like you.

Unjustified. Mmmmk.

He flat out lied about touching her, called her delusional.

He's lucky it wasn't a man he yanked back, and he wasn't knocked out cold.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Originalist

Actually, he is a survivor who withstood unjustified and withering assaults on his character from people just like you.

Wow, you are amazingly on the wrong side of things. I cannot take you seriously.

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Wow, you are amazingly on the wrong side of things. I cannot take you seriously.

So if he was a shill for Hellary Clinton, you could take him seriously?

[Esaias]

Apparently the "right side" is "whoever and whatever is against Trump", even if it means Hillary. The Republicans would rather have Hillary win than Trump, one of their own candidates.

The GOP is toast after this election, no matter what happens.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

So if he was a shill for Hellary Clinton, you could take him seriously?

Originally Posted by Esaias

Apparently the "right side" is "whoever and whatever is against Trump", even if it means Hillary. The Republicans would rather have Hillary win than Trump, one of their own candidates.

The GOP is toast after this election, no matter what happens.

In church we take the view - You are known by the company you keep and whoever you hang around with is your future.

So, a simple question to you both - Do you pay attention to the group of people that Donald Trump surrounds himself with?

Do you listen to David Wohl, Kayleigh McEnany, Stephen Miller, Paul Manafort (lobbyist who Trump said he would never hire) and Roger Stone (defined as not working in an "official" capacity - meaning in an "unofficial" behind the scenes)?

Do you pay attention to these people who are clearly liberal? Donald Trump is running a 3rd Party campaign inside the GOP, and it's dishonest at best.

I don't see any difference between Trump and Hillary. Two sides of the same coin.

Is Trump using this opportunity to combine both parties into one by stealth? He certainly isn't a Republican. His own children are not registered Republicans who didn't bother to register to vote for their own father in the NY Primary. Why not? Because they don't care.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

In church we take the view - You are known by the company you keep and whoever you hang around with is your future.

So, a simple question to you both - Do you pay attention to the group of people that Donald Trump surrounds himself with?

Do you listen to David Wohl, Kayleigh McEnany, Stephen Miller, Paul Manafort (lobbyist who Trump said he would never hire) and Roger Stone (defined as not working in an "official" capacity - meaning in an "unofficial" behind the scenes)?

Do you pay attention to these people who are clearly liberal? Donald Trump is running a 3rd Party campaign inside the GOP, and it's dishonest at best.

I don't see any difference between Trump and Hillary. Two sides of the same coin.

Is Trump using this opportunity to combine both parties into one by stealth? He certainly isn't a Republican. His own children are not registered Republicans who didn't bother to register to vote for their own father in the NY Primary. Why not? Because they don't care.

I pay attention, yes. Birds of a feather and all that. Trump is friends with the Clinton's. The Clinton's are friends with the Bush's. Cruz worked for Bush and married a fellow Bush operative who is/was a VP at Goldman Sachs and who endorsed and helped get the ball rolling on the SPP and NAU. Cruz is being supported by clowns like Lindsey Graham and Ryan and blah blah blah.

Yes, the company one keeps is very telling.

[Esaias]

Cruz, whose records are sealed just like Obama. Who may not even be a citizen much less a natural born citizen, as there is no record he ever had US citizenship to begin with. Whose dad apparently has been using a fictitious name and birth date, who used to campaign for Castro in Texas, who has no verifiable history at all.

Yes, ones companions say a lot...