Withdraw Bible College from UPC

Consapostolic1 · #1 10-03-2007, 10:59 AM

If the president/founder of a bible college wants to withdraw out of the upc will he be able to keep the bible college he founded?

ChicagoPastor · #2 10-03-2007, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Consapostolic1

If the president/founder of a bible college wants to withdraw out of the upc will he be able to keep the bible college he founded?

Someone like a Nathaniel Wilson who's Bible School is tied into his chrch, could pull out his Bible School...

But no one could pull out CLC, IBC, TBC, Gateway.....

pelathais · #3 10-03-2007, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Consapostolic1

If the president/founder of a bible college wants to withdraw out of the upc will he be able to keep the bible college he founded?

That depends upon ownership of the property and such. You could conceivably have a situation where the founder pulls out and takes the name only, the property belonging to some sort of district of other entity.

The UPC "endorsed" Bible Schools are not owned and controlled by the UPCI itself (the exception being UGST). Rather each school meets certain standards and acknowledges specific beliefs in order to attain an endorsement from the UPCI. Both the school and the UPCI and walk away from that agreement at anytime and for any reason.

What happens to the property and such then depends upon ownership.

Consapostolic1 · #4 10-03-2007, 11:07 AM

Thanks for answering my question

pelathais · #5 10-03-2007, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChicagoPastor

Someone like a Nathaniel Wilson who's Bible School is tied into his chrch, could pull out his Bible School...

But no one could pull out CLC, IBC, TBC, Gateway.....

It would be extremely difficult to pull them out. In the case of Gateway, which is owned and controled by the Missouri District of the UPCI you would have to have a situation where the majority of churches in the MO district wanted to pull the whole district out. Then they could go whatever direction they pleased.

Or you could have a situation where the Missouri District came to be overtaken by some strange new doctrine- say one involving canned ravioli. The canned ravioli may be so offensive to the rest of the org that HQ rescinds its endorsement of the school. (That might seem silly, but have you seen the canned ravioli there?)

Old Paths · #6 10-03-2007, 11:12 AM

What about a Bible college started by a Missionary?

pelathais · #7 10-03-2007, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Paths

What about a Bible college started by a Missionary?

Wow, that would be interesting - just from the geo-political angles.

Property in many developing nations is so often determined by who totes the most AK47's. So the ownership of land and buildings, while subject to law, may be as shaky as the regime holding power- something to keep in mind when praying for our missionaries.

My understanding is that the schools that are endorsed by the UPC FM division are under the ownership and control of the national church bodies. For example a UPC Bible School in Kenya is owned and controled by the legal entity known as the UPC of Kenya. It's constitution and manual would describe anything else further.

In some countries, the "church" has to be licensed by the government in order to operate. For practical purposes, in some countries you have denominations sort of lumped together under such licenses. I don't think property ownership is effected, but again, the whole paradigm of freedom that we're used to in North America goes out the window in far too many places in the world. Setting up a school is a real gamble and and an act of faith.

ChicagoPastor · #8 10-03-2007, 11:26 AM

Overseas, the Bible Schools are under control of the organization....in a few instances Missionaries have bought properties in their own name and when there was a split/division it got ugly as to who owned the Bible School....

Bullwinkle · #9 10-03-2007, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Paths

What about a Bible college started by a Missionary?

Loaded question. I suppose you are referring to the one that was bought and paid for with FMD money.
A missionary is an employee of Foreign Missions - the school or property does not belong to him, it belongs to his employer who paid for it.

Next question?

Old Paths · #10 10-03-2007, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bullwinkle

Loaded question. I suppose you are referring to the one that was bought and paid for with FMD money.
A missionary is an employee of Foreign Missions - the school or property does not belong to him, it belongs to his employer who paid for it.

Next question?

Looks like we will see, doesn't it.