Quote:
Originally Posted by philjones
According to Romans 14:17 the Kingdom of God is not meat and drink but righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Ghost.
We almost universally accept that the unrighteous are not qualified to be in the Kingdom of God. What is your position on those who are not at peace regardless of their circumstance or those who are short on joy? Are they any more qualified for citizenship in the Kingdom of God than the unrighteous?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheltiedad
Hmmmm, so in your scenario, even if someone has fulfilled all of the salvation requirements, if they do not have joy and peace in their life then they would not be in the Kingdom of God, which I assume means Heaven?
|
As I see it, things like this are the ideals to strive for. Nobody I know of is 100% at peace all the time. Nobody lives in joy 24x7. Nobody is perfect (righteous) all day every day. Everyone needs their feet washed occasionally (
John 13:8-10). Also, it's not so much qualifications to be in the Kingdon, but results of arriving there, like fruits of the Spirit. (Over time!)
But the Kingdom is the ideal. Here on Earth, we live in the kingdom (as part of God's family) but imperfectly. Only in Heaven will we be perfected.
The context of
Romans 14 is regarding eating meat (and by extension, doing any number of things that would offend weaker brothers, such as wearing jewelry or a beard, perhaps?). Paul is stressing that these things are not what the Kingdom is all about, that's all. The important things are righteousness (in things that matter, such as kindness and honesty), peace and joy. Not the rules, the do's and don'ts.
Rom 14 I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that
there is nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him it is unclean.