Bush Responsible for 9-11

[Dedicated Mind]

A new book out today and an op ed piece in the nyt details still classified presidential daily briefings that were warning of an "imminent attack" beginning in may of 2001, 4 months before 9-11.

Bush wanted an attack to pursue his war mongering ways. the proof is out today.

The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible.

full article: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/op...me&ref=general

Mitt Romney has the same foreign policy team as george w. more neocon, unilateral war mongering in store for america.

[deacon blues]

He was also behind the Pearl Harbor attack, Kennedy's assassination, Watergate, and Monica's blue dress. Glad the truth is finally getting out.

[deacon blues]

Let's talk about Bill Clinton who was given Osama Bin Laden on a silver platter but felt he didn't have international legal authority to accept him. Or the Clinton admin that treated terrorists as "criminals" rather than the enemy.

[Nitehawk013]

So? What exactly was GWB supposed to do with a briefing that says "uh...we think it is imminent that a terrorist group will attack us sometime in the next few months". You don't think thats a little vague?

Even if they told him that they knew the terrorists would be planning to use commercial planes as missles what do you expect? Do you expect him to issue an order to ground every commercial and private flight in the country for the forseeable future until the Fed can track down some suspected terrorists when they didn't know who they were or where they were hiding?

The idea that GWB could have done anything more than he did to prevent 9/11 is just stupid.

[HolyFire]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Let's talk about Bill Clinton who was given Osama Bin Laden on a silver platter but felt he didn't have international legal authority to accept him. Or the Clinton admin that treated terrorists as "criminals" rather than the enemy.

Originally Posted by Nitehawk013

So? What exactly was GWB supposed to do with a briefing that says "uh...we think it is imminent that a terrorist group will attack us sometime in the next few months". You don't think thats a little vague?

Even if they told him that they knew the terrorists would be planning to use commercial planes as missles what do you expect? Do you expect him to issue an order to ground every commercial and private flight in the country for the forseeable future until the Fed can track down some suspected terrorists when they didn't know who they were or where they were hiding?

The idea that GWB could have done anything more than he did to prevent 9/11 is just stupid.

Israel's Mossad passed info to the Clinton admin that it would be a plane hitting the WTC and named Osama and Moussaui (sp?). Clinton was playing golf when our snipers had Osama in their crosshairs (retaliation for USS Cole) but Bill was too busy chumming celebs at the Pro Am. He refused to acknowledge the guy trying to get his attention to get Presidential authorization (book Dereliction of Duty). I personally feel BOTH administrations knew something and dragged their feet.

[Cindy]

Excuse me, but are these people stupid? Seriously think about it, for one thing Bush and Clinton live in the US. Are people really saying they would let terrorist attack and kill people, for what reason? Hello, the Pentagon was hit, and it is reasonable to think they were more than likely going to target the White House and the Capitol Building. How is Bush going to have a war if he is dead?

[HolyFire]

Originally Posted by Cindy

Excuse me, but are these people stupid? Seriously think about it, for one thing Bush and Clinton live in the US. Are people really saying they would let terrorist attack and kill people, for what reason? Hello, the Pentagon was hit, and it is reasonable to think they were more than likely going to target the White House and the Capitol Building. How is Bush going to have a war if he is dead?

Bush was in FL on day of attack. I've always felt there was a conspiracy there, especially with billions in $$$ missing about to exposed. I always found it funny that Bin Laden's name was tossed out there so soon after the attacks started.

I agree with the idea 7 WTC didn't just fall. Thermite definitely sounds plausible. 9/11 was the beginning of the end of freedom. The housing collapse and crippling of our economy + electing a socialist is but another step. How else will America accept the anti-christ?

[Cindy]

Originally Posted by HolyFire

Bush was in FL on day of attack. I've always felt there was a conspiracy there, especially with billions in $$$ missing about to exposed. I always found it funny that Bin Laden's name was tossed out there so soon after the attacks started.

But, he still lives here. Seriously, I understand the money part. Is this theory Bush used terrorist to kill Americans? Is that the bottom line?

[HolyFire]

Originally Posted by Cindy

But, he still lives here. Seriously, I understand the money part. Is this theory Bush used terrorist to kill Americans? Is that the bottom line?

It was a 'greater good' situation, but yeah. See addition to my previous post.

[Cindy]

Originally Posted by HolyFire

It was a 'greater good' situation, but yeah. See addition to my previous post.

Okay, got it. And really don't agree with it. And of course we know the CIA and other government entity's never lie.

And I am not just talking about Bush, I include Clinton and the VP's as well.