|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
12-29-2010, 07:54 PM
|
 |
Best Hair on AFF
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apprehended
aaah, 
Probably love Paul even less since he is known to have been the chiefest of sinners.
He must have been a bad dude...especially since he said that "what I would not do, that I do." Couldn't help himself, I don't suppose. |
Are you ok?
|
12-29-2010, 07:58 PM
|
 |
DOING THE FIRST WORKS
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,069
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Smith
Are you ok?
|
I always react that way when I come out of the comas.
|
12-29-2010, 09:04 PM
|
|
Best Hair on AFF
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apprehended
I always react that way when I come out of the comas.
|
Wow.
|
12-29-2010, 09:23 PM
|
 |
Love God, Love Your Neighbor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,363
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Smith
I can't try to twist your arm, but would you sit with a friend while he/she smokes a joint...drinks to the point of drunkenness....executes a business motivated by greed...if you were with a friend when he/she used the Lord's name in vain, would you get up and leave the table?
|
All of these would depend upon the situation.
But none of these are an occasion where the sin itself is celebrated. You attend a wedding to celebrate an event. The joining together of two people. That's the sole purpose of the event. The joining together of two people. Attend a birthday party where these two people happened to be present? That would be more of a parallel to the examples you gave. An event where sin happens to be present.
I really can't think of another example that would be exactly the same. There's just a difference between sin being present, and an event that is geared solely towards celebrating a sinful act.
|
12-29-2010, 09:26 PM
|
|
Love God, Love Your Neighbor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,363
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Okay, DA - the Muslim wedding thing.
There is nothing sinful about a man and a woman marrying each other (unless they're already married to someone else or some such thing) regardless of their religion, their race, their nationality, their economic status. Their religious belief is a completely separate issue. But the fact of them marrying each other - nothing wrong with that.
|
12-29-2010, 09:27 PM
|
 |
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by *AQuietPlace*
All of these would depend upon the situation.
But none of these are an occasion where the sin itself is celebrated. You attend a wedding to celebrate an event. The joining together of two people. That's the sole purpose of the event. The joining together of two people. Attend a birthday party where these two people happened to be present? That would be more of a parallel to the examples you gave. An event where sin happens to be present.
I really can't think of another example that would be exactly the same. There's just a difference between sin being present, and an event that is geared solely towards celebrating a sinful act.
|
My thoughts exactly.
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
|
12-29-2010, 09:30 PM
|
|
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apprehended
I always react that way when I come out of the comas.
|
Just one question... was this "carpet time", "magic carpet" or other OBE??
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
|
12-29-2010, 09:42 PM
|
|
DOING THE FIRST WORKS
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,069
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoovie
Just one question... was this "carpet time", "magic carpet" or other OBE??
|
|
12-29-2010, 09:45 PM
|
|
Best Hair on AFF
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by *AQuietPlace*
All of these would depend upon the situation.
But none of these are an occasion where the sin itself is celebrated. You attend a wedding to celebrate an event. The joining together of two people. That's the sole purpose of the event. The joining together of two people. Attend a birthday party where these two people happened to be present? That would be more of a parallel to the examples you gave. An event where sin happens to be present.
I really can't think of another example that would be exactly the same. There's just a difference between sin being present, and an event that is geared solely towards celebrating a sinful act.
|
What difference does it make if it's being "celebrated"? Is a wedding a "celebration" anyway? Personally, I wouldn't see it that way. But no matter....if the principle is, you being present in the commission of sin is the act of issuing approval, shouldn't you run when sin is being committed since your presence represents approval? Whether or not you know in advance doesn't seem to matter. I mean...if someone sprung a porn film on you at a party, wouldn't you need to leave or would turning your head be enough?
|
12-29-2010, 10:02 PM
|
|
Love God, Love Your Neighbor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,363
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Smith
What difference does it make if it's being "celebrated"? Is a wedding a "celebration" anyway? Personally, I wouldn't see it that way. But no matter....if the principle is, you being present in the commission of sin is the act of issuing approval, shouldn't you run when sin is being committed since your presence represents approval? Whether or not you know in advance doesn't seem to matter. I mean...if someone sprung a porn film on you at a party, wouldn't you need to leave or would turning your head be enough?
|
Not commission of a sin, celebration of a sin. Joining in the celebration of a sin. And yes, a wedding is a celebration.
And yeah, if I was at a party and someone put on a porn film, I'd leave because I don't want to see or hear that.
I think we're stretching the point a little bit.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:04 PM.
| |
