Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Sanctuary > Deep Waters
Facebook

Notices

Deep Waters 'Deep Calleth Unto Deep ' -The place to go for Ministry discussions. Please keep it civil. Remember to discuss the issues, not each other.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 09-11-2007, 07:44 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Believer View Post
My point is, I wouldn't build my doctrine on these few passages because they are in dispute of their trustworthiness.
You know, I have ran into a lot of Unitarians that make that same claim to most of the verses we would both use to pove the Deity of Christ. I'm not sure it's a good argument. Something has to be "The Word of God" and at somepoint we also have to have a right translation.
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 09-11-2007, 09:07 PM
Believer
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
You know, I have ran into a lot of Unitarians that make that same claim to most of the verses we would both use to pove the Deity of Christ. I'm not sure it's a good argument. Something has to be "The Word of God" and at somepoint we also have to have a right translation.
Then you must also accept 1 John 5:7 in the KJV. Are you willing to do that?

1Jo 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.


How many are bearing record in heaven? The list is in 7b.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 09-11-2007, 09:10 PM
Believer
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
On THIS forum, you have not been any better than what Rico posted. Yes you have had your moments of pejorative terms as well as others, but as you would read I made my comments to EVERYONE Oneness and Trinitarian. Let's not act like it's just the Oneness here doing so.

That is NOT going to happen. Even the quips about someone else here being not christ like is seen as a swipe. So I am saying to everyone, let's not go there with the finger pointing.
Show me Prax. Please point my posts out to me. If I did, I will apologize.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 09-11-2007, 09:44 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Believer View Post
Then you must also accept 1 John 5:7 in the KJV. Are you willing to do that?

1Jo 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.


How many are bearing record in heaven? The list is in 7b.
How many whats are bearing record in heaven? I don't have a problem with accepting this verse, even though most scholars view it as an interpolation
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 09-11-2007, 09:44 PM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Believer View Post
Show me Prax. Please point my posts out to me. If I did, I will apologize.
If experience is an indicator, Believer, it's best to call it a night.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 09-11-2007, 09:45 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Believer View Post
Show me Prax. Please point my posts out to me. If I did, I will apologize.
you don't need to apologize. Im not going to argue with you over this. Stop it, ok? Stop trying to argue with me when I tell everyone to chill out.
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 09-11-2007, 10:22 PM
Believer
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
How many whats are bearing record in heaven? I don't have a problem with accepting this verse, even though most scholars view it as an interpolation
Let me first say, I'm not promoting anything here. I'm only trying to show what the verse literally states. My Bible doesn't have this verse. I read from the NASB.

Who are the three in heaven in this verse?


For there are THREE bearing record, as in witnesses...the Father, the Word (Son) and the Holy Spirit, and these THREE are one.

hen (neut.); a prim. num.; one: - agreement (1), alike *(1), alone (3), common (1),

This is the same use of the word hen as we see in John 10:30. Are you sure you don't have a problem with this verse?

RWP: The spurious addition is: en tōi ouranōi ho patēr, ho logos kai to hagion pneuma kai houtoi hoi treis hen eisin kai treis eisin hoi marturountes en tēi gēi (in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

This clearly teaches the Trinity, BUT, I don't use it because it is in dispute.

RWP: Some Latin scribe caught up Cyprian’s exegesis and wrote it on the margin of his text, and so it got into the Vulgate and finally into the Textus Receptus by the stupidity of Erasmus.
Reply With Quote Received Infraction
  #78  
Old 09-11-2007, 10:25 PM
Believer
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
you don't need to apologize. Im not going to argue with you over this. Stop it, ok? Stop trying to argue with me when I tell everyone to chill out.
Prax, I wasn't arguing, I was serious, if I did or said something that came across as offensive I want it pointed out.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 09-11-2007, 11:26 PM
Admin's Avatar
Admin Admin is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Believer View Post

This clearly teaches the Trinity, BUT, I don't use it because it is in dispute.

.
We reject any teaching about the Trinity here, Believer.

Please refer to the sticky in this section where is is NOT acceptable.
__________________
"Ya'll behave now, ya hear!"

The Admin Team
*AQuietPlace*
CC1
Esther
Hoovie
Prax
The Mrs
votivesoul

Take a moment to review the Forum Rules by clicking here.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 09-11-2007, 11:42 PM
Believer
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Admin View Post
We reject any teaching about the Trinity here, Believer.

Please refer to the sticky in this section where is is NOT acceptable.

What? The first thing I said was that I wasn't promoting. The third thing I said was that my Bible doesn't have this verse in it, and I quoted A.T. Robertson who said "Some Latin scribe caught up Cyprian’s exegesis and wrote it on the margin of his text, and so it got into the Vulgate and finally into the Textus Receptus by the stupidity of Erasmus".

I was disputing the fact that the verse was even in the original manuscript. But, taking the verse Literally is clearly stating there is a Tri-unity of God. I wasn’t promoting, but showing the for what it says.

Quote:
This clearly teaches the Trinity, BUT, I don't use it because it is in dispute.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why did not God offer some kind of Salvation to Fallen angels? COOPER Deep Waters 122 08-30-2007 06:29 PM
Universal Salvation mfblume Deep Waters 155 07-21-2007 08:15 PM
The Foundation of Salvation is built upon Doctrine.. revrandy Deep Waters 54 06-25-2007 07:01 AM
Libs believe in salvation by works Steve Epley Deep Waters 85 05-13-2007 01:39 AM
Salvation Does Not Cease at Great White Throne Judgment crakjak Deep Waters 10 04-17-2007 07:54 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.