Jaunita Bynum on ABC Tomorrow !

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

How would I know?

lol for one there is more "pay per view" than just the porn kind... and none of them have commercials (I mean... seriously, $50 for Boxing or MMA fights? If they had commercials there'd be riots!!)

So what's the point, then? Why even present the hypothetical in which you would intertwine yourself with such a smutty publication?

Because the point I was trying to make is if someone presents you with the opportunity to spread the gospel, you should take it...

[MissBrattified]

Originally Posted by redeemedcynic84

lol for one there is more "pay per view" than just the porn kind... and none of them have commercials (I mean... seriously, $50 for Boxing or MMA fights? If they had commercials there'd be riots!!)

It was TIC, RC. LOL. We've watched PPV movies before! I just forgot that they don't have commercials...although I do seem to remember some advertisements between showtimes, but maybe it was just for other movies.

Because the point I was trying to make is if someone presents you with the opportunity to spread the gospel, you should take it...

I agree with your generic statement, but I think there are exceptions. As I mentioned before, advertising in publications and within certain programming is financial support for that publication and/or that programming, and therefore it would have to be considered whether or not paying their bills warranted a spot where "sinners" are definitely going to see the ad, and how that would look overall in the public eye, both Christian and secular alike.

There is a point when "don't let your good be evil spoken of" DOES come into play...isn't there? Is there ever a point that it should matter?

Maybe I'm not thinking out of the box enough. *shrug*

[Elizabeth]

Originally Posted by Theresa

ok, since this is where the ladies are...my mom is sending a test picture of the Tampa airport to test our system of "reporting" from conference

lets see how this will work..she is supposed to send me pictures of the clothes, the fads, all the new things

So far so good! Please keep the reports coming!

You could start your own thread too

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

It was TIC, RC. LOL. We've watched PPV movies before! I just forgot that they don't have commercials...although I do seem to remember some advertisements between showtimes, but maybe it was just for other movies.

SINNER!!

and, yeah, they used to have some "filler" stuff in between the time the movie ends and a half-hour block that the next one can start (so, the movie runs 105 minutes including the end credits, but it is scheduled for 2 hours, so they have 15 minutes of "filler" which is basically nothing-fluff or whatever ads for other movies they are showing on PPV are in between, but the assumption is no one is actually watching the channel during this time)

Nowadays, however, PPV is almost all "in Demand" where you essentially rent the movie for a block of time and can play, rewind, fast forward, etc. the movie for that period of time...

I agree with your generic statement, but I think there are exceptions. As I mentioned before, advertising in publications and within certain programming is financial support for that publication and/or that programming, and therefore it would have to be considered whether or not paying their bills warranted a spot where "sinners" are definitely going to see the ad, and how that would look overall in the public eye, both Christian and secular alike.

There is a point when "don't let your good be evil spoken of" DOES come into play...isn't there? Is there ever a point that it should matter?

Maybe I'm not thinking out of the box enough. *shrug*

I would say advertising would be crossing the line because of the financial/support aspect of it... if Playboy has no advertisers, they don't exist... so why help them exist by advertising in it???

I was referring to if Playboy asked to interview you (and it wasn't being done at the Playboy Mansion lol) and you could teach the gospel in the interview, how could one turn it down, ya know?

and there is a point where that comes into play, I think advertising (and thus paying for the magazine to exist) is probably at that point, but if they want to give us free space in thier magazine, I don't see why we should turn it down...

(not that they ever would, but whatever)

[Thad]

Post it here in Thad's Tab Theresa ! will you?

[Thad]

well did anyone sis SISTER JAUNITA Today ???

If so, your Thoughts


I think she;s milking this for all it's worth and trying to get a foot hold in mainstream media

[Theresa]

Originally Posted by Thad

Post it here in Thad's Tab Theresa ! will you

when they come in, I'll put them in the GC thread, which ever one is active and posting the play by play
and I'll put it on the tab

[Thad]

Originally Posted by Theresa

when they come in, I'll put them in the GC thread, which ever one is active and posting the play by play
and I'll put it on the tab

alright

[Elizabeth]

Originally Posted by Thad

well did anyone sis SISTER JAUNITA Today ???

If so, your Thoughts


I think she;s milking this for all it's worth and trying to get a foot hold in mainstream media

so she was on today? I am confused!

It said wednesday and the 27th on that ad.

[MissBrattified]

Originally Posted by Jeanie

so she was on today? I am confused!

It said wednesday and the 27th on that ad.

Nice observation...I didn't even notice that...