Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #611  
Old 04-27-2007, 11:28 AM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newman View Post
OK then. This should be easy money. A hundred dollars is yours when you wear such "pants" around your town for a week.
And you wear a bustle and corset?????????????????????????? In court????
Reply With Quote
  #612  
Old 04-27-2007, 11:39 AM
The Mrs's Avatar
The Mrs The Mrs is offline
Jellybean!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,996
A man of importance. Costume period 1775-85.

Reply With Quote
  #613  
Old 04-27-2007, 11:41 AM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Mrs View Post
A man of importance. Costume period 1775-85.

SEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PANTS they are.
Reply With Quote
  #614  
Old 04-27-2007, 11:42 AM
Thad's Avatar
Thad Thad is offline
Invisible Thad


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Mrs View Post
A man of importance. Costume period 1775-85.


still pants with Tube- like looking socks so what ???
Reply With Quote
  #615  
Old 04-27-2007, 11:53 AM
Newman Newman is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
And you wear a bustle and corset?????????????????????????? In court????
Ah yes.... but I never denied that women dressed differently today than 225 years ago. I have also never suggested that Deuteronomy 22:5 required that men wear pants and women wear dresses.
Reply With Quote
  #616  
Old 04-27-2007, 11:55 AM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newman View Post
Ah yes.... but I never denied that women dressed differently today than 225 years ago. I have also never suggested that Deuteronomy 22:5 required that men wear pants and women wear dresses.
You are hedging. The principle is there God hates unisex clothing. It blurs the line between the genders and God hates it kind of like homosexuality.
Reply With Quote
  #617  
Old 04-27-2007, 11:56 AM
The Mrs's Avatar
The Mrs The Mrs is offline
Jellybean!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thad View Post
HO,

I've come to the conclusion that you women who want to wear pants are going to find a loop hole no matter what. I know how coon feels now. IF you want a way out to wear pants no matter what any one says you and others will reason it out period. There is a way that seems right but the END is destruction. you might win the argument on paper,i'm certain makes you feel all the more justified,but the spiritual destruction that is taking place before our very eyes is the Real Proof in the pudding. Anyone who cannot see it has spiritual blinders on.
If there was anything on this thread I would take issue with, it would be this statement.

You couldn't be farther from the truth in my book with this statement Thad.
Reply With Quote
  #618  
Old 04-27-2007, 11:56 AM
The Mrs's Avatar
The Mrs The Mrs is offline
Jellybean!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
You are hedging. The principle is there God hates unisex clothing. It blurs the line between the genders and God hates it kind of like homosexuality.
Intersting statement seeing how for century upon century men AND women wore the same garments.
Reply With Quote
  #619  
Old 04-27-2007, 11:57 AM
Thad's Avatar
Thad Thad is offline
Invisible Thad


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Mrs View Post
If there was anything on this thread I would take issue with, it would be this statement.

You couldn't be farther from the truth in my book with this statement Thad.
okay but I still stand by it .
Reply With Quote
  #620  
Old 04-27-2007, 11:57 AM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Mrs View Post
Intersting statement seeing how for century upon century men AND women wore the same garments.
NOT SO they were different!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Part 2 of the "Wife Swap" Interview Subdued Fellowship Hall 12 10-25-2011 12:19 PM
"Heart Soul & Mind: Sanctuary" by Felicity Felicity Café Blog-a-bit 110 02-10-2010 06:13 AM
What If Your Church Board Told You "Get In The UPC Or Leave?" rrford Fellowship Hall 86 01-31-2008 08:44 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.