Gay Marriage: For or Against?

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Twisp

That is a different situation. Animals, children and corpses cannot consent, therefore they cannot legally enter into marriage.

As for polygamy, and polyandry, I feel that if it is between consenting adults, let them go at it.

Every one of your arguments are pathetic. Drug dealers and users don't get a free pass by reason of mutual consent.

My children can consent. Wrong on that claim also. Animals also disregard consent. Every night there is date rape amongst cats and dogs in the 'hood.

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

Every one of your arguments are pathetic. Drug dealers and users don't get a free pass by reason of mutual consent.

My children can consent. Wrong on that claim also. Animals also disregard consent. Every night there is date rape amongst cats and dogs in the 'hood.

No, legally, your children cannot consent to sexual relations or to marriage with an adult. An animal cannot consent to sexual relations or to marriage with a human, since they have no way of expressing their consent.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Twisp

No, legally, your children cannot consent to sexual relations or to marriage with an adult. An animal cannot consent to sexual relations or to marriage with a human, since they have no way of expressing their consent.

Oh now you added "legally". Libs even allow schools to take these girls to abortions without parental notification. Libs teach fornication in sex ed. Obama opposes abstinence education.

You are ready for a teaching moment. Watch rabbits. They don't give verbal consent. They don't get married. Do you know where the little bunnies came from?

A civil society does make laws for the benefit of the culture and this current lib culture wants to destroy civilkity.

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

Oh now you added "legally". Libs even allow schools to take these girls to abortions without parental notification. Libs teach fornication in sex ed. Obama opposes abstinence education.

Well, yeah, since we were talking about legal issues, I assumed you understood that.

You are ready for a teaching moment. Watch rabbits. They don't give verbal consent. They don't get married. Do you know where the little bunnies came from?

So you have taught me that rabbits have sex with each other? lol

The example given was not one animal mating with another animal, but a human wanting relations with an animal. That would not be possible, since the animal could not give consent to the human.

A civil society does make laws for the benefit of the culture and this current lib culture wants to destroy civilkity.

A civil society does not discriminate against any one group.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by crakjak

We discriminate against certain people all the time, and it is good for society.

We discriminate against bestiality, against pedophilia, against polygamy, against murderers, and rapists and many others that are unhealthy for society.

Homosexuality is generally very bad for society, Sodom was an example, the men ignored beautiful women for men with plumbing that had to be used in a dysfunctional manner, rather than becoming husbands and fathers that protect and provide.

If homosexuality is practiced it becomes human desire without bounds, when man removes these boundaries for personal satisfaction
he becomes more and more self-centered. Ultimately society breaks down, and is destroyed.

I make my case against!!

A study of homosexual men shows that more than 75% of homosexual men admitted to having sex with more than 100
different males in their lifetime: approximately 15% claimed to have had 100-249 sex partners, 17% claimed 250-499, 15%
claimed 500-999 and 28% claimed more than 1,000 lifetime sexual partners. (Bell AP, Weinberg MS. Homosexualities. New York
1978).

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Twisp

Well, yeah, since we were talking about legal issues, I assumed you understood that.


So you have taught me that rabbits have sex with each other? lol

The example given was not one animal mating with another animal, but a human wanting relations with an animal. That would not be possible, since the animal could not give consent to the human.


A civil society does not discriminate against any one group.

Jails are full of perps that society caught and their behavior is illegal. Society set the rules. Many are repeat offenders. They are discriminated agains. locked up even. Lose freedom.

Libs are dragging society down hill. Liberation is creating the std epidemics.

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

A study of homosexual men shows that more than 75% of homosexual men admitted to having sex with more than 100
different males in their lifetime: approximately 15% claimed to have had 100-249 sex partners, 17% claimed 250-499, 15%
claimed 500-999 and 28% claimed more than 1,000 lifetime sexual partners. (Bell AP, Weinberg MS. Homosexualities. New York
1978).

Please provide a link for those statistics.

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

Jails are full of perps that society caught and their behavior is illegal. Society set the rules. Many are repeat offenders. They are discriminated agains. locked up even. Lose freedom.

Libs are dragging society down hill. Liberation is creating the std epidemics.

Being a homosexual is not illegal. That analogy does not work.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Twisp

Please provide a link for those statistics.

(Bell AP, Weinberg MS. Homosexualities. New York
1978).

You are not educated in research. Not all abstracts and documents are on links.

Your gay agenda is about denying facts and research. Gays have 7 years shorter life expectancy than do smokers. They need a warning label.

"This is tough news. It's not pleasant to hear," said former Education Secretary William Bennett on ABC's This Week Nov. 9. "But it's very important, and it's part of telling the truth." The occasion for tough-but-needed truth telling: Bill Clinton's first-ever presidential speech to an organized gay-rights group, the Human Rights Campaign. Clinton had conferred respectability--wrongly--on the gay quest for approval when in fact, said Bennett, he "should tell the truth on this one": Homosexuality "takes 30 years off your life." The average life expectancy for gay men, Bennett declared, was just 43.

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

(Bell AP, Weinberg MS. Homosexualities. New York
1978).

You are not educated in research. Not all abstracts and documents are on links.

Your gay agenda is about denying facts and research. Gays have 7 years shorter life expectancy than do smokers. They need a warning label.

i know what research you are referring to. I just wanted you to post it so we could show its context.

The study you are referring to also says that homosexuality is not a choice, but has a biological basis. Do you believe that also?

As far as the number of sexual partners, I am sure if you took a poll of both heterosexuals and homosexuals in 1968, the number of partners would be high on both sides.