1> Did the Tulsa 6 have a right to start WPF ? - Page 6

dizzyde · #51 02-06-2008, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stmatthew

The only reason I have posted FOR the WPF is because there are so few that are here that defended them, and so many that post against them. I am not a memeber, nor do I believe I ever will be, a memeber of the WPF. I really don't see a major difference in them and the UPC. Not enough of one to matter anyway.

OK, that makes me understand the situation a little more, I kind of wondered what your stake in it was.

The funny thing is, we agree on the last point, that is what makes me question it as much as I do!

RevBuddy · #52 02-06-2008, 02:52 PM

My conclusion...

...it's amazing how much real ignorance there is among us OP's. The more I read, the more it oozes out of us...quite a shame, really...

...all the spectators to our illogical reasoning must be most amused by it...

...at times, we reek of it...we can't "hep" oursefffs...it's in our jeans...

stmatthew · #53 02-06-2008, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stmatthew

The only reason I have posted FOR the WPF is because there are so few that are here that defended them, and so many that post against them. I am not a memeber, nor do I believe I ever will be, a memeber of the WPF. I really don't see a major difference in them and the UPC. Not enough of one to matter anyway.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dizzyde

OK, that makes me understand the situation a little more, I kind of wondered what your stake in it was.

The funny thing is, we agree on the last point, that is what makes me question it as much as I do!

I just realized I spelled member wrong. TWICE!!!!! hahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

stmatthew · #54 02-06-2008, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RevBuddy

My conclusion...

...it's amazing how much real ignorance there is among us OP's. The more I read, the more it oozes out of us...quite a shame, really...

...all the spectators to our illogical reasoning must be most amused by it...

...at times, we reek of it...we can't "hep" oursefffs...it's in our jeans...

REV,

My mom told me a story of a lady that she used to pick up for church. This was one of those "super spiritual" people. One day they were driving, and the lady was telling my mom how spiritual she was. She raised her hand towards the ceiling of the car and said, "I'm up here", and then lowered it to almost touching the floor and said, "and your down here". I told my mom she should have stopped the car and said, "and your OUT HERE!!".

dizzyde · #55 02-06-2008, 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stmatthew

I just realized I spelled member wrong. TWICE!!!!! hahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well, I didn't want to say.... LOL!!

But it is weird that you did it twice, maybe you were trying to create a new word!!

stmatthew · #56 02-06-2008, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dizzyde

Well, I didn't want to say.... LOL!!

But it is weird that you did it twice, maybe you were trying to create a new word!!

systematic typing. at least I'm consistent

embonpoint · #57 02-06-2008, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RevBuddy

My conclusion...

...it's amazing how much real ignorance there is among us OP's. The more I read, the more it oozes out of us...quite a shame, really...

...all the spectators to our illogical reasoning must be most amused by it...

...at times, we reek of it...we can't "hep" oursefffs...it's in our jeans...

Especially the supersmart and logical that accept things like oohhh say Scientology or mormonism or the face of Mary in a tortilla or...............

I sometimes think we are a little hard on ourselves too.

The Mrs · #58 02-06-2008, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stmatthew

I just realized I spelled member wrong. TWICE!!!!! hahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I thought it was the name of a Muppet from years ago!

I was about to go look it up and find it!

rgcraig · #59 02-06-2008, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RevBuddy

My conclusion...

...it's amazing how much real ignorance there is among us OP's. The more I read, the more it oozes out of us...quite a shame, really...

...all the spectators to our illogical reasoning must be most amused by it...

...at times, we reek of it...we can't "hep" oursefffs...it's in our jeans...

jeans?

pelathais · #60 02-06-2008, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R.D. Foster

Please offer examples of how and what they were trying to change.

Read David Bernard's Understanding the Articles of Faith for a detailed explanation and history of the changes to the Articles of Faith. If you'd like, I can point you to a publically available electronic version. Just PM me and I respond via PM.

As far as "trying" to change- they did change. The "conservatives" have had almost unfettered success in running their agenda through the UPC at least since the 1950's. The Tampa vote was the first time that any element of their changes was ever rolled back.