The Difference Between the PCI of the Merger and the Current Counterfeits - Page 52

SDG · #**511** 02-24-2007, 10:55 AM

Like my tag line??? If Acts was obeyed ... we'd all get along. DW likes it.

crakjak · #**512** 02-24-2007, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

No.

I am saying you can't stop partway and expect to receive the full benefit of God's provision.

No one is susgesting the we stop partway, rather that God's blessing and protection is on the person that has enter the GATE!

Felicity · #**513** 02-24-2007, 10:56 AM

We're laughed at by outsiders who themselves see the hypocrisy represented by apostolic preachers who say one thing in the pulpit and another in the parlour.

Even those outside our ranks see the double standard and have heard the double talk so many need to get off their high horses of condemnation and judgmentalism and quit with the broadbrushing because they believe in essence not one whit differently than I do about salvation and who will and won't be saved.

In the long run it's up to God to judge but for heaven's sake if you believe something believe it and quit talking out of both sides of your mouths.

Thank you.

SDG · #**514** 02-24-2007, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak

No one is susgesting the we stop partway, rather that God's blessing and protection is on the person that has enter the GATE!

Thanks ... crakjak .. for making this plain for CS.

SDG · #**515** 02-24-2007, 10:58 AM

Perhaps PP you haven't examined your own wording of the PCI view

preach repentance, baptism and Holy Ghost infilling as necessary - but perhaps not necessary for salvation. They feel these things should be fulfilled to ensure obedience, or to enhance the believers life.

PP ... what is really going on here is an attempt to polarize/ or unite the Apostolic family under the "Acts 2:38" banner .... even MA was keen enough to pick up on this ... notice how he carefully crafted his support for TV evangelism by rallying the cry.

-----------------------

bump for PP.

Felicity · #**516** 02-24-2007, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

I don't consider Felicity "faith only."

I'm not! Anyone who believes that is wayyyyyyy out in left field. I mean come on for heaven's sake!

rgcraig · #**517** 02-24-2007, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Felicity

We're laughed at by outsiders who themselves see the hypocrisy represented by apostolic preachers who say one thing in the pulpit and another in the parlour.

Even those outside our ranks see the double standard and have heard the double talk so many need to get off their high horses of condemnation and judgmentalism and quit with the broadbrushing because they believe in essence not one whit differently than I do about salvation and who will and won't be saved.

In the long run it's up to God to judge but for heaven's sake if you believe something believe it and quit talking out of both sides of your mouths.

Thank you.

I like it when you get your dander up!

This is a very "between the eyes" post and will be hard for many to accept, but it rings so true.

Nahum · #**518** 02-24-2007, 11:00 AM

Okay then, freeatlast, Sherri and Daniel, we are all friends right?
I have nothing but respect for you. But give me a little latitude to explain myself, please.

1. Would you all agree that you have left what you once believed, or that you have left what you were once identified as?

2. Can you see Coonskinner's point that our doctrine is continually slammed and poked at, and dissed on these forums? Yet when we state any disdain for "belief only" doctrine we are viewed as intolerant and judgemental.

Surely you have viewed my posts enough to know that I try very hard to be anything but judgemental? We simply disagree - thats all.