Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
Isn't the godhead "good" despite the suffering we see in the world? Isn't this aspect of Deity worthy of consideration?
In my opinion, DKB actually laid down the first credible framework for a "Oneness Apologetic" back when he published his "Trinitarian Controversies" books round about 1992 or so.
He was the first to publish a reasoned and accurate look at the development of the doctrine of the Trinity by a Oneness writer. Everyone else simply followed the discredited meme that "Constantine invented the trinity at the Council of Nicea because he worshiped the sun god!"
Bernard understands the subtleties and complexities of the historical development here. Everyone would be well served to touch base with his treatment of the subject before adding to the body of work.
|
Your first paragraph -- was that TIC? Otherwise, not understanding.
Everything else, interesting indeed. Glad to hear DKB is more than a parrot, but realizes the complexities in the subject.
So the entire symposium is on the godhead? I didn't say it was a bad thing. Just you don't usually see "apologetic" like that in terms of an exclusive meeting to discuss godhead like that... at least it's rare. Maybe that's why they're doing it!