|
Tab Menu 1
Political Talk Political News |
|
|
08-11-2016, 06:53 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: chasin Grace
Posts: 9,594
|
|
Re: Good for Trump
thing is he is going to garner a lot of support from those who recognize 2A as an ominous responsibility, and not just a right to own a gun. If you are involved in that system, you by default are legitimizing it; at what point does your responsibility there come to the fore? What line has to be crossed?
|
08-11-2016, 12:15 PM
|
|
Unvaxxed Pureblood
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Zion aka TEXAS
Posts: 26,688
|
|
Re: Good for Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by TGBTG
Oh please, it's pretty obvious, c'mon..lol
These were his words -
“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” Mr. Trump said, as the crowd began to boo. He quickly added: “Although the Second Amendment people — maybe there is, I don’t know.”
What's your explanation for what only 2A people can do AFTER Clinton "gets to pick her judges" ??
For her to be picking judges, the election would have been won by Clinton, so he obviously did NOT mean having 2A people using the power of voting.
The Donald even went as far as to specifically say nobody besides 2A people will be able to do anything about the situation AFTER Clinton picks her judges...hahaha...that's as obvious as it can get.
|
He did not threaten anyone. Read his words carefully.
I told you he's a genius when it comes to trolling the commitards.
|
08-11-2016, 12:18 PM
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17,807
|
|
Re: Good for Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by TGBTG
Oh please, it's pretty obvious, c'mon..lol
These were his words -
“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” Mr. Trump said, as the crowd began to boo. He quickly added: “Although the Second Amendment people — maybe there is, I don’t know.”
What's your explanation for what only 2A people can do AFTER Clinton "gets to pick her judges" ??
For her to be picking judges, the election would have been won by Clinton, so he obviously did NOT mean having 2A people using the power of voting.
The Donald even went as far as to specifically say nobody besides 2A people will be able to do anything about the situation AFTER Clinton picks her judges...hahaha...that's as obvious as it can get.
|
|
08-11-2016, 12:18 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
|
|
Re: Good for Trump
You'd think that after 30 years somebody would be able to make something stick on Hillary if she's truly that criminal. So, in my opinion, either it's a witch-hunt.... or we have the must inept Republicans and Justice Department staff in the history of the human race.
|
08-11-2016, 12:19 PM
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17,807
|
|
Re: Good for Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esaias
He did not threaten anyone. Read his words carefully.
|
Not overtly. But it was definitely implied. He knew what he was saying. TGBTG was spot on with his post.
|
08-11-2016, 12:24 PM
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17,807
|
|
Re: Good for Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
You'd think that after 30 years somebody would be able to make something stick on Hillary if she's truly that criminal. So, in my opinion, either it's a witch-hunt.... or we have the must inept Republicans and Justice Department staff in the history of the human race.
|
Congress can only go so far. And we know both the State and Justice Dept have blocked investigations or the release of information. It's not far-fetched to believe this administration and Justice Dept has done what it needed to protect its party's nominee. No way will obama allow his party's nominee to be sullied by an indictment. Which is why his AG made sure no charges would be recommended by Comey.
|
08-11-2016, 12:25 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
|
|
Re: Good for Trump
I can't believe this. Men of greater intellect and moral integrity is defending Trump. Folks, he's an idiot. And he's as corrupt and morally bankrupt as anyone could say Hillary is....if not more.
Most of Trump's defenders are lowering themselves to his level by defending him. That I find indefensible. It also testifies that many of these so called Evangelical leaders and born again believers supporting Trump would vote for the devil himself over a Democrat.
|
08-11-2016, 12:26 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
|
|
Re: Good for Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by n david
Congress can only go so far. And we know both the State and Justice Dept have blocked investigations or the release of information. It's not far-fetched to believe this administration and Justice Dept has done what it needed to protect its party's nominee. No way will obama allow his party's nominee to be sullied by an indictment. Which is why his AG made sure no charges would be recommended by Comey.
|
So, you're saying it's politics as usual? lol
|
08-11-2016, 12:27 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
|
|
Re: Good for Trump
And what's up with Rudy's meltdown and blithering blathering when confronted?
I think someone has kidnapped the majority of Republican leaders and has replaced them with robots stuck on stupid. lol
|
08-11-2016, 12:29 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
|
|
Re: Good for Trump
The Republicans I once knew wouldn't stand for this. There would be open revolt against Trump. The way he is running his campaign, his personal history, his temperament, all of these things making it glaringly obvious that the man shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office. Yet.... the Republicans have lost their backbone and lick his.... boots.
Honestly, the best thing the Republicans could do is get Trump OUT and put in Gingrich. I think Gingrich would devastate Hillary.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 PM.
| |