Oneness Pentecostal Apologetics Conference - Page 48

DAII · #**471** 06-29-2010, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

Oh wow! To have been there... to only have been there.

Yet to secure a copy of the tape ... gave up fairly quickly .... but will try again.

Baron1710 · #**472** 06-29-2010, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notofworks

So true...I even just PMed you about it. Yadon was barking his standards views in CLC classes in the 85-86 school year well before his ouster. It was well known within the system and he was fully supported.

He was PCI all the way and made no apologies for it.

DAII · #**473** 06-29-2010, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notofworks

In 1986, eight years before his Landmark sermon, he said in class, "You boys that wanna pastor and get worked up about women wearing pants....what'll you do if God calls you to Africa and the women aren't wearing anything? You'll be glad to get them to wear pants. But what if God calls you to Scotland and the MEN are wearing a dress? That's REALLY gonna mess you up."

No one fired him then, huh?

I was told the pressure to get him to go came from the parents of the students and Western district officials like Price ....

He had just bought a home when he left "voluntarily".

I think Haney caved and sold out.

Jeffrey · #**474** 06-29-2010, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Hysteria? You said

I have not argued contary. But this only extends so far as theology on godhead. It's a far cry from "I have all truth" which is what you claimed.

I don't read minds. I read what people post. Then rather than chalk it up to your vague worded reference you again used a pejorative.

You said "In all fairness"...I don't think you are attempting to be fair. It's one thing to say "I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth, I didn't mean it the way it sounded. I meant XXX" instead you used your vague statement and my misunderstanding of it as another opportunity to resort to pejorative language

Im willing to accept you were not trying to say that I claimed "I have all truth", which is what you DID say, but don't use that again as a pretense to tell me Im hysterical, lol good grief.

The "hysteria" I refer to was far before my addition of "all" in the "have all truth" statement. It was your very first reply to me. And it continues. What was wrong with saying "in fairness, you didn't say _____" but you said "___?" LOL Killing me.

I just feel your whole response to me right now is hysterical. Sorry, I'm pretty straightforward. Not trying to be offensive. I know "hissy fit" and "touchy" are harsh words. I'll dig for softer adjectives next time and I promise to work on it with you. Especially with you since we seem to clash so often on here lately, for whatever reason.

The common denominator happens to be in contexts of Oneness vs. Trinity. Don't know if that means anything. And FTR, I don't profess the Trinitarian creed.

Praxeas · #**475** 06-29-2010, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

It's spelled "Juvenile."

Call it what you want to. I think you're being a big

right now.

I interacted with you and at the first response you cried foul. Yes, you threw a hissy fit and were incredibly touchy.

I forgive you.

lol..good one "correct spelling"..eh you don't merely interact WITH me, you comment about me. personally. Again that's all fine, if that is what you want Jeffy, but as I said it's taking away from the dialog. If you want a verbal spat, let's do it somewhere else. That's all I ask. Take it up in PM or something. I can spell Sophomoric...does that work?

Jeffrey · #**476** 06-29-2010, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas

lol..good one "correct spelling"..eh you don't merely interact WITH me, you comment about me. personally. Again that's all fine, if that is what you want Jeffy, but as I said it's taking away from the dialog. If you want a verbal spat, let's do it somewhere else. That's all I ask. Take it up in PM or something. I can spell Sophomoric...does that work?

AGAIN...

pelathais · #**477** 06-29-2010, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAII

I was told the pressure to get him to go came from the parents of the students and Western district officials like Price ....

He had just bought a home when he left "voluntarily".

I think Haney caved.

And why? All LY did was to follow the spirit of the merger and to preach from his heart. The UPC was founded to include his views of soteriology. Yet, the UPC wadded him up and tossed him on the side of the road like he was the discarded remains of a Quarterpounder Value Meal.

None of these "three stepper" guys can ever maintain their position in an open forum nor in a public debate. They have to isolate and pick off their "foes" (really, their "brethren") on by one in secret.

It's a nasty political game and it has nothing to do with truth.

Jeffrey · #**478** 06-29-2010, 05:19 PM

Proxy, I admitted to adding "all" to your statement, can you admit to being a bit touchy with me from the get-go? Just want to leave you with that opportunity.

Jeffrey · #**479** 06-29-2010, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais

And why? All LY did was to follow the spirit of the merger and to preach from his heart. The UPC was founded to include his views of soteriology. Yet, the UPC wadded him up and tossed him on the side of the road like he was the discarded remains of a Quarterpounder Value Meal.

None of these "three stepper" guys can ever maintain their position in an open forum nor in a public debate. They have to isolate and pick off their "foes" (really, their "brethren") on by one in secret.

It's a nasty political game and it has nothing to do with truth.

He was a primary interviewee with Fudge's book wasn't he?

How has that affected the Yadon clan? A lot of them remain in the UPC?

DAII · #**480** 06-29-2010, 05:20 PM

Jeff ... more on LY at Christian Life from Fudge's Christianity Without the Cross: