|
Tab Menu 1
Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
|
|
12-28-2010, 10:46 AM
|
|
Best Hair on AFF
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandie
Don't make statements about what I've listened to or not. You don't know a thing about me in this regard.
I've been very active in the prolife community. I know what it's like to get my hands "dirty" as you put it.
I surely hope this woman you would hold hands with hasn't claimed the Name of Jesus and given her life to the Lord.
But, you still didn't answer my question. Would you attend a robbery and hold their hand thru it?
And please don't go to the point that it's illegal to steal, it's also illegal to murder one's child, in the eyes of God.
|
I can only answer the question you asked, so no, I wouldn't hold someone's hand while they committed a robbery. I'd get arrested.
If I don't know about you, then tell me about you. Have you sat with a girl in the aftermath of her abortion?
|
12-28-2010, 10:49 AM
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII
Jesus accompanies the preacher sleeping in the Motel 6 with his secretary ...
sometimes even anointing the preacher to speak in other tongues the following Sunday ...
Bad, Jesus.
|
I guess Paul was bad.
1 Corinthians 5:1-13
|
12-28-2010, 10:55 AM
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Smith
I can only answer the question you asked, so no, I wouldn't hold someone's hand while they committed a robbery. I'd get arrested.
|
What makes that sin not worthy of your company? You're not willing to really put yourself on the line then, since you would get arrested?
Quote:
If I don't know about you, then tell me about you. Have you sat with a girl in the aftermath of her abortion?
|
I'm not going to go into details, I learned the hard way what can happen when too much info is given out on the web.
I've been involved in the prolife community a long time. It's so intense, so traumatic dealing with the deaths of not only the children, but the mothers as well that I've taken a year off. I don't know when I'll be getting my "hands dirty" again.
Today nearly 4,000 children will die gruesome deaths. Just know that.
|
12-28-2010, 10:56 AM
|
Freedom@apostolicidentity .com
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,597
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandie
|
Surely Jesus is worse.
__________________
VISIT US @ WWW.THE316.COM
|
12-28-2010, 11:04 AM
|
|
Forever Loved Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
For Mr. Smith, in the marriage you attended of a homosexual couple, was God mentioned?
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV
He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV
Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
|
12-28-2010, 11:43 AM
|
|
Jesus' Name Pentecostal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truthseeker
Would you attend a wedding of a couple founded off adultery? If they both were married before had an affair then divorced to marry each other?
|
As far as I know, the first time Jesus told someone that He was the Christ, was in John chapter 4. To whom did He make this statement? A woman who had been married 5 times and who was currently living with a man to whom she was not married.
He took the time to talk to her and before the conversation was over she was converted. She ran into town and because of her testimony many believed.
There are several things that can be seen here.
Just a couple of them are:
-Jesus did not tell her she had 5 current husbands but spoke of them in the past tense. This would agree with Deuteronomy 24:1-4 where it speaks of a divorced husband being a "former husband" or we would use the term "ex" for ex-husband.
-just because she was living with a person did not make them married
-Jesus did not tell her she was on her way to hell for being divorced or for living with someone
-Jesus did not tell her to leave her current partner before she could testify to others
-Jesus uses women to carry His message
|
12-28-2010, 11:50 AM
|
|
Not wrestling w/ flesh n blood
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,015
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
There are a lot of "good" nice people who sin and live in sin. Only the blood of Jesus makes anyone righteous. And we daily fail and need His mercy. But.. People are not born homosexuals.. and therein is where the moral spiritual debate begins. If your of the opinion God makes an abomination in "creating" a person gay.. Your perspective will always be different then the person who believes otherwise. Only time and eternity will give us the answers. For the record I'd never knowingly take a shower with a queer and if one trys to hit on me.. he/she would be hit. This country is and has been headed in the wrong direction morally for years.. It'll only get worse allowing perverts to openly serve our great country.
__________________
There is a conspiracy of silence in the land.
The gloves are off.
|
12-28-2010, 12:19 PM
|
Freedom@apostolicidentity .com
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,597
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Rutledge
There are a lot of "good" nice people who sin and live in sin. Only the blood of Jesus makes anyone righteous. And we daily fail and need His mercy. But.. People are not born homosexuals.. and therein is where the moral spiritual debate begins. If your of the opinion God makes an abomination in "creating" a person gay.. Your perspective will always be different then the person who believes otherwise. Only time and eternity will give us the answers. For the record I'd never knowingly take a shower with a queer and if one trys to hit on me.. he/she would be hit. This country is and has been headed in the wrong direction morally for years.. It'll only get worse allowing perverts to openly serve our great country.
|
You forgot to finish this post with "in Jesus name".
__________________
VISIT US @ WWW.THE316.COM
|
12-28-2010, 01:33 PM
|
Saved by Grace
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Decatur, TX
Posts: 5,247
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Now we know what it looks like when He does, but why does He do it? "he wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness." The wrath of God is already operating in our culture. And God has abandoned our society on a wide scale and let our society go the way it chooses to go without restraint. But God has abandoned our society because our society has first abandoned God. There is no surer and no sadder evidence of a corrupted, wicked abandoned society than when that society will not tolerate anger against sin. Our society won't tolerate anger against sin. Our society feeds on sin and wants no one to deny it its iniquities. And so, here we are under the wrath of God's abandonment. It isn't like it once was. Restraining grace has been pulled back and this society gets more immoral, more homosexual and more depraved every day. And why? The major reason is summed up in one statement. "We suppress the truth."
http://www.gty.org/Resources/Sermons...=homosexuality
__________________
"Resolved: That all men should live to the glory of God. Resolved, secondly: That whether or not anyone else does, I will." ~Jonathan Edwards
"The only man who has the right to say he is justified by grace alone is the man who has left all to follow Christ." ~Dietrich Bonheoffer, The Cost of Discipleship
"Preachers who should be fishing for men are now too often fishing for compliments from men." ~Leonard Ravenhill
|
12-28-2010, 02:17 PM
|
|
ultra con (at least here)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 1,962
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
sandie seriously? Comparing providing succor to a woman having an abortion to assisting in a felonious armed robbery?
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 AM.
| |