No prosecution for Trump's campaign manager

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

He lied. He said he didn't touch her and called her delusional.

Also, you're completely wrong here...he wasn't "found innocent." The police charged him with a crime and the prosecutor used her discretion as to whether to pursue the case. She chose not to. That is NOT the same as him being proven innocent.

They had no case and they knew, and you know it. And no, he did not lie. If you brushed up against thousands of people a day would you remember each one? If someone accused you of practically throwing them on the ground, would it not be realistic to believe that initially, in your state of disbelief, you might say, "What? I never touched her!", referring to the type of touching she made in the accusation, forgetting that you had casually touched her? Is that so unbelievable to you? Are you so blind by dislike for Trump that you won't give someone the benefit of the doubt, especially when a video shows he was lied about?

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

This is the best analysis on this issue that I have read thus far. And with it, I am done with this conversation and arguing about Donald Trump. #NeverTrump

Incidentally, I blocked Jim Hoft months ago.

Rush, Savage, Ingram, Hannity, Cain...all frauds?

Have you really sunk this low?

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Our ruling

Trump said that when Michelle Fields "found out that there was a security camera, and that they had her on tape, all of a sudden that story changed."

We see no evidence that Fields’ story about her altercation with Trump’s campaign manager has changed. She gave an initial account and hasn't backed off of it.

We rate Trump’s claim Pants on Fire.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...her-story-fir/

She continues to stand by a story proved to be a lie on a video. She is not a person worth defending. She is a fraud.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

We've been over this. Yes, you did. You quoted me and called me mentally retarded. Don't lie.


You tried masking your words by rephrasing it, but the meaning is the same. A person whose brain no longer functions normally is considered mentally retarded.

"""Mental Retardation is a disorder not a disease in which the mental functioning of an individual is disturbed (i.e.- the brain doesn't function normally)"""
http://speechtherapy.ygoy.com/2009/1...l-retardation/

Perhaps, "self deluded" would have been a better choice of words on my part. It more accurately describes what I meant. So I'm sure now with that cleared up, you'll never try to use that as a shield from criticism.

In your typically cowardly fashion, you continue to puts meanings to my words I never implied or intended in order to deflect from the point I made, which I will now make again.....

Laura Ingram, Herman Cain ,Jeff Session, Chris Cristy, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage ...Rednecks? Racists? Low information? You "yawned" when I mentioned them before because you know you have no answer. But that is what cyber bullies like yourself do when cornered.

You do indeed lie about and falsely malign Trump supporters, NDavid. You continually spam this board and try to dominate the conversation with your rudeness and insults. But again, what can one expect from a bully?

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

You "yawned" when I mentioned them before because you know you have no answer. But that is what cyber bullies like yourself do when cornered.

I'm a cyber bully? . Let's see...YOU have called me stupid, ignorant, a zealot, mentally retarded, uninformed, a sucker, self deluded, a coward and other things and you call ME a cyber bully?

Originally Posted by Originalist

You do indeed lie about and falsely malign Trump supporters, NDavid. You continually spam this board and try to dominate the conversation with your rudeness and insults. But again, what can one expect from a bully?

Hahaha. Again, your hypocrisy is incredible. After our issue of almost a month ago, I have tried leaving personal insults out of my responses to you. Yet you have continued and have not ceased to be rude and insulting.

Add "self-deluded" and "coward" to your repertoire now.

Thanks for continuing to prove my point.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

They had no case and they knew, and you know it. And no, he did not lie. If you brushed up against thousands of people a day would you remember each one? If someone accused you of practically throwing them on the ground, would it not be realistic to believe that initially, in your state of disbelief, you might say, "What? I never touched her!", referring to the type of touching she made in the accusation, forgetting that you had casually touched her? Is that so unbelievable to you? Are you so blind by dislike for Trump that you won't give someone the benefit of the doubt, especially when a video shows he was lied about?

You're being dishonest here. He didn't just "brush up" against Michelle. He grabbed her. Then he lied and said he didn't. Then he called her delusional and his boss went out and claimed she was lying about the whole thing when she wasn't. The video proved she wasn't.

"""Aronberg said police were within their right to charge Lewandowski, but prosecutors are held to a higher standard and thus didn't find enough to bring the case."""
They didn't "find enough" to make a case. That's a far cry from proving Corey innocent, as you falsely claim.

Also, there's this jewel in the article:

"""He also revealed that Trump personally spoke with prosecutors and the campaign shared a draft of an apology letter with Aronberg's office "earlier this week," though it apparently has not yet been sent."""

http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/13/politi...arges-dropped/

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

You're being dishonest here. He didn't just "brush up" against Michelle. He grabbed her. Then he lied and said he didn't. Then he called her delusional and his boss went out and claimed she was lying about the whole thing when she wasn't. The video proved she wasn't.

"""Aronberg said police were within their right to charge Lewandowski, but prosecutors are held to a higher standard and thus didn't find enough to bring the case."""
They didn't "find enough" to make a case. That's a far cry from proving Corey innocent, as you falsely claim.

Also, there's this jewel in the article:

"""He also revealed that Trump personally spoke with prosecutors and the campaign shared a draft of an apology letter with Aronberg's office "earlier this week," though it apparently has not yet been sent."""

http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/13/politi...arges-dropped/

I never said he only brushed up against her. I was using an analogy. I later said he had casual contact. And an apology for a misunderstanding , even if he is not in the wrong, is a nice gesture and would be seen as such by someone whose mind is not so cluttered as yours.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

I'm a cyber bully? . Let's see...YOU have called me stupid, ignorant, a zealot, mentally retarded, uninformed, a sucker, self deluded, a coward and other things and you call ME a cyber bully?


Hahaha. Again, your hypocrisy is incredible. After our issue of almost a month ago, I have tried leaving personal insults out of my responses to you. Yet you have continued and have not ceased to be rude and insulting.

Add "self-deluded" and "coward" to your repertoire now.

Thanks for continuing to prove my point.

Any criticism I have of you has been in response to your months of continually putting people down. And again, you will not deal with these points....

Laura Ingram, Herman Cain ,Jeff Session, Chris Cristy, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage ...Rednecks? Racists? Low information? You "yawned" when I mentioned them before because you know you have no answer. But that is what cyber bullies like yourself do when cornered.

You do indeed lie about and falsely malign Trump supporters, NDavid. You continually spam this board and try to dominate the conversation with your rudeness and insults. But again, what can one expect from a bully?

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

In your typically cowardly fashion, you continue to puts meanings to my words I never implied or intended in order to deflect from the point I made

I don't need to "puts meanings" to your words. Your posts are clear enough as to your intent.

Are you going to lie and claim your post was meant as a compliment:

Originally Posted by Originalist

their brain is no longer able to function normally.

Tell me, since you claim I'm "puts meanings into your words" that you "never implied or intended," what was your intention and what did you mean by stating my brain no longer functions normally?

Here's your opportunity to try and state what you meant. You say you didn't mean it as mentally retarded, yet that's what it means.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

Any criticism I have of you has been in response to your months of continually putting people down.

Lame excuse.