Mooney Guns for "Secret" Meeting in Detroit?

[Ron]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

You didn't confront me about anything. I see the original post now. SO what? Again it is not against the rules to say to someone you don't believe them. Sorry but if that bothers you, get off the internet and live in a cave alone. Otherwise if you guys think that other person was wrong, go address that person directly. That is fine, but the stuff about being anonymous gets old old old.

I can see why!

[Praxeas]

Ron, why is it OK for you to make accusations but others can't? Isn't that in the bible too? Doesn't the bible address people who do things but attack others for doing what they themselves do? yes I believe there is a word for that.

I see it's ok to call people gossipers but not ok to call them liars?

Particularly when the word gossip does not fit what we are actually discussing.

I'll repeat it again

gossip
idle talk or rumor, esp. about the personal or private affairs of others:

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Ron

I can see why!

another post without substance. Ron you have little to nothing to say other than to whine about not knowing everyone elses personal identity....BTW why do you need to know the personal information about others?

[Ron]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Ron, why is it OK for you to make accusations but others can't? Isn't that in the bible too? Doesn't the bible address people who do things but attack others for doing what they themselves do? yes I believe there is a word for that.

I see it's ok to call people gossipers but not ok to call them liars?

Particularly when the word gossip does not fit what we are actually discussing.

I'll repeat it again

gossip
idle talk or rumor, esp. about the personal or private affairs of others:

Prax, it is obvious where you stand on this, you go by Prax (not your real name) & probably (as it appears from your posting) that you like anonymous posts) & it would be real hard to stand by any accusation one would make.
What is the difference?

I don't make anonymous accusations!
What I say, I stand by.

Care to do the same?

[Ron]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

another post without substance. Ron you have little to nothing to say other than to whine about not knowing everyone elses personal identity....BTW why do you need to know the personal information about others?

As another poster posted, it is easy hiding behind anonymity to make baseless attacks, gossip, & innuendo about others!

Where is the accountability?

[EA]

Ron, seriously, just leave.

[Rhoni]

Originally Posted by Ron

As another poster posted, it is easy hiding behind anonymity to make baseless attacks, gossip, & innuendo about others!

Where is the accountability?

Now that is a thought!!!!!

ACCOUNTABILITY

I take issue with so many that hide behind anonymity in order to say things they would not say publically against the policies and procedures that they espouse or sign their name to every time it comes due to renew their license or teach in their Bible Colleges, or hold positions in bordering countries, ect.

Just my thoughts on the matter: Rhonda R. Cyprus

[Ron]

Originally Posted by Edward Anglin

Ron, seriously, just leave.

Ed, that is the nicest thing you have said to me! Sniff!
Am I convicting you?

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Ron

Prax, it is obvious where you stand on this, you go by Prax (not your real name) & probably (as it appears from your posting) that you like anonymous posts) & it would be real hard to stand by any accusation one would make.
What is the difference?

I don't make anonymous accusations!
What I say, I stand by.

Care to do the same?

Ron. I prefer to not let the gossipmongers and the hatemongers not know my personal information...care to tell me why you need my personal information?

Making an accusation has nothing to do with whether someone is anonymous or not Ron. Please show me where in the rules or in the bible the topic of accusation is OK when not done anonymously.

IF and I stress IF someone makes an accusation without being anonymous and they whine about someone that makes an accusation while being anonymous, merely because that person is anonymous, then that person in my opinion is being hypocritical by saying "It's ok to make an accusation against someone as long as you tell them who you are"....

That's as bad as someone making an accusation against someone then calling out others for making accusations. That is hypocrisy.

What is going on is not gossip. The source of the message is available to everyone.

Someone stating their opinion that they believe the motive of someone else was different than what they said is no less an accusation than YOUR constant accusations here. That you do it under the name "Ron" is irrelevant. Your accusations don't magically become "ok" just because your real name is Ron.

[Rhoni]

Originally Posted by Edward Anglin

Ron, seriously, just leave.

I think Ron should stay - He is indeed an honest man and stands up for what he believes and does it under his own name