Tulsa Report Day 2 - Page 39

NW Pastor · #**381** 01-26-2008, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by connielori

UUUUmmmmmmm If I remember right......It was voted AGAINST the year prior. Do we just keep bringing it back up every year?...

Perhaps if they hadn't brought it up AGAIN there would be no Tulsa.

Wow! We are not talking about "them", but NW. Changing the focus of the debate is always a sign of lack of firm logical footing.

I'm glad our founders did not give up on the fight with the Brits just because they kept sending out more armies. They fought until the battle was won!! We are to endure hardness, as good soldiers, according to Paul.

I guess the bean patch is worth defending, but the UPC is worthy of abandonment? Great logic.

TrmptPraise · #**382** 01-26-2008, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Well....you know how Pentecostals count heads right? 1,2,5,6,9.....

They also tend to count the same head twice....from a different angle

and with some of the consort hairstyles today, looking at them from a different angle does make them a totally different person.

PastorD · #**383** 01-26-2008, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by connielori

UUUUmmmmmmm If I remember right......It was voted AGAINST the year prior. Do we just keep bringing it back up every year?...

Perhaps if they hadn't brought it up AGAIN there would be no Tulsa.

UUUUmmmmmmm, you don't remember right. It was sent to a committee for study in 06.

connielori · #**384** 01-26-2008, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PastorD

UUUUmmmmmmm, you don't remember right. It was sent to a committee for study in 06.

AFTER it had been voted AGAINST at GC.....

connielori · #**385** 01-26-2008, 11:22 PM

"Simon Says copy me when i say ummmmmm" LOL

NW Pastor · #**386** 01-26-2008, 11:22 PM

So true. I, who would have voted against the resolution, did not vote to send it to committee. I wanted to defeat it right then. To say a "committee" vote was a vote against the resolution is not right. We can not get in the head of each preacher who voted (but boy would that be interesting)!

So, no, it was not voted against in Columbus.

George · #**387** 01-26-2008, 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by connielori

AFTER it had been voted AGAINST at GC.....

NO. It was never brought to vote. California DS (at the time) asked to have it tabled and that is what happened. There was not a vote.

PastorD · #**388** 01-26-2008, 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by connielori

"Simon Says copy me when i say ummmmmm" LOL

If your going to stomp around in your high heels saying, "UUUmmmmmm" at least know what your talking about.

George · #**389** 01-26-2008, 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by connielori

You obiviously don't know DR. W_________. He certainly doesn't have to be at the head of ANYTHING to have 'power'. Dr. W____________ is success personified. Take a trip to CA, and visit his church. Get an education on the growth and revival his church has experienced from his leadership....in a very small amount of time. Read a couple of his books. This is a GREAT man. A powerful man of God.....who needs validation from NO ONE.

A man who convinced many to leave Michigan and follow him to California.