What I have learned from AFF - Page 37

Digging4Truth · #**361** 12-08-2009, 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Timmy

Can't reply to this, now. Maybe later, when I have time to read it.

See you Thursday.

MomOfADramaQn · #**362** 12-08-2009, 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam

How many here believe that this person is an actual new poster who is what he says he/she is and not some one come back under a new name or a troll?

Yeah - this guy is a joke and is yanking everyone's chain LOL - he's good at it though.

revrandy · #**363** 12-08-2009, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MomOfADramaQn

Yeah - this guy is a joke and is yanking everyone's chain LOL - he's good at it though.

I think he is Ed Anglin....

Joey Boneski · #**364** 12-09-2009, 01:07 AM

Whoa! How can one use a scripture in church matters to justify their arguement and then be told they had a weak arguement? Are you calling scriptures weak when they back a church standard? Is this site anti Apostolic? So far all I've seen is attacking the church!

Jeffrey · #**365** 12-09-2009, 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joey Boneski

Whoa! How can one use a scripture in church matters to justify their arguement and then be told they had a weak arguement? Are you calling scriptures weak when they back a church standard? Is this site anti Apostolic? So far all I've seen is attacking the church!

Can you explain?

What scripture? What did the scripture support? What did the scripture mean?
Was the argument weak in that they pulled a scripture out of a hat to support a pet doctrine that the early church didn't believe? Please elaborate further Boneski.

Joey Boneski · #**366** 12-09-2009, 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

Can you explain?

What scripture? What did the scripture support? What did the scripture mean?
Was the argument weak in that they pulled a scripture out of a hat to support a pet doctrine that the early church didn't believe? Please elaborate further Boneski.

What pet doctrine? What early church? Who made u the patrol troll?

Jeffrey · #**367** 12-09-2009, 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joey Boneski

What pet doctrine? What early church? Who made u the patrol troll?

Were you homeschooled? This is what people do -- they interact. You make a wild claim, this is me trying to understand where you are coming from. Got it? Make sense to you?

Joey Boneski · #**368** 12-09-2009, 01:59 AM

If you made sense to me I wouldn't have asked you or been dying laughing at you.....
What's wrong with homeschool? I wasn't homeschooled but are you on here hacking them too? What wild claim? Someone other than Jeffrey said that scriptures were being used in weak arguements....but since Jeffrey made it his business you look it up...I don't consider scriptures backing up beliefs to be wild claims....guess your question should be....What am I argueing about? Let me know more so I can!

Jeffrey · #**369** 12-09-2009, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joey Boneski

If you made sense to me I wouldn't have asked you or been dying laughing at you.....
What's wrong with homeschool? I wasn't homeschooled but are you on here hacking them too? What wild claim? Someone other than Jeffrey said that scriptures were being used in weak arguements....but since Jeffrey made it his business you look it up...I don't consider scriptures backing up beliefs to be wild claims....guess your question should be....What am I argueing about? Let me know more so I can!

Another joker. You'd rather be combative than have an actual discussion. Is that it?

Did you know that Trinitarians, Baptists, Calvinists, even Jim Jones all used scriptures to back their arguments? So just because they used a scripture means they have a strong argument? Is that what you're saying?

Joey Boneski · #**370** 12-09-2009, 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

Another joker. You'd rather be combative than have an actual discussion. Is that it?

Did you know that Trinitarians, Baptists, Calvinists, even Jim Jones all used scriptures to back their arguments? So just because they used a scripture means they have a strong argument? Is that what you're saying?

No....what i'm saying is don't condemn anyone for using scripture to explain their convictions...and that was being done on here....I don't believe any of the above backed their convictions by scripture....only their false doctrines, which were based on one scripture that several other scriptures fully explain. Speaking of being combative, did I aim at you? I believe you responded first and it wasn't very friendly. I'm Joe Cool