**preacher forums**

[D. Wright]

Originally Posted by Bullwinkle

I am a member of the other forum, by extension one of the guys he has falsely accused. If there is an adulterer (currently in a physical adulterous relationship) currently posting and he has proof (not simply vague accusations) then he can send me the name and the proof and I will be happy to forward it to the forum powers that be.

Until then he is blowing smoke!

Is there a difference in physical/non-physical adultery?

[Sam]

Originally Posted by D. Wright

Is there a difference in physical/non-physical adultery?

Matthew 5:27-28
2 Peter 2:14
Job 31:1
James 4:4

[Theophil]

Originally Posted by D. Wright

Is there a difference in physical/non-physical adultery?

Hi-jack alert! Hi-jack Alert! j/k I believe there is a significant difference.

[Bullwinkle]

Originally Posted by D. Wright

Is there a difference in physical/non-physical adultery?

In very important areas for our discussion.
Physical adultery is very easy to define - virtual not so much. If I accuse you of virtual adultery in your mind how do you defend yourself?

[D. Wright]

Originally Posted by Sam

Matthew 5:27-28
2 Peter 2:14
Job 31:1
James 4:4

Originally Posted by Bullwinkle

In very important areas for our discussion.
Physical adultery is very easy to define - virtual not so much. If I accuse you of virtual adultery in your mind how do you defend yourself?

See scriptures.

Easy to define.

Defend? God knows.

[Theophil]

Originally Posted by Bullwinkle

In very important areas for our discussion.
Physical adultery is very easy to define - virtual not so much. If I accuse you of virtual adultery in your mind how do you defend yourself?

'Tis true.

[Bullwinkle]

Originally Posted by D. Wright

Is there a difference in physical/non-physical adultery?

Originally Posted by D. Wright

See scriptures.

Easy to define.

Defend? God knows.

Only two of those scriptures actually apply, really only the first one.

Now, since it is easy to define - have at it without copying and pasting.

[D. Wright]

Originally Posted by Bullwinkle

Only two of those scriptures actually apply, really only the first one.

Now, since it is easy to define - have at it without copying and pasting.

Only takes one.

[Bullwinkle]

Originally Posted by D. Wright

Only takes one.

Now define the mental adultery and the proof you have that an individual without confessing it has actually committed it (excepting pornography)

[D. Wright]

Originally Posted by Bullwinkle

Only two of those scriptures actually apply, really only the first one.

Now, since it is easy to define - have at it without copying and pasting.

Are you making a case to protect someone?