Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #281  
Old 12-27-2010, 01:30 PM
DAII DAII is offline
Freedom@apostolicidentity .com


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,597
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by canam View Post
BTW Dan, i didnt say Smith was upci ,but he got a super somewhere over him,DA thinks it always comes down to the upc.They the boogie man!
Yeah, his wife ...
__________________
VISIT US @ WWW.THE316.COM
Reply With Quote
  #282  
Old 12-27-2010, 01:31 PM
Timmy's Avatar
Timmy Timmy is offline
Don't ask.


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 24,212
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII View Post
Yeah, his wife ...
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty

More New Stuff in Timmy Talk!
My Countdown Counting down to: Rapture. Again.
Why am I not surprised?
Reply With Quote
  #283  
Old 12-27-2010, 01:37 PM
Jermyn Davidson's Avatar
Jermyn Davidson Jermyn Davidson is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In His Hands
Posts: 13,918
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandie View Post
Is the military going to have to create homosexual showering/living quarters?

And did this repeal address transgendered people?
What an awesome question!

I imagine with all of the medical procedures involved in that transformation, there would be something that any military doctor could find to declare someone unfit for service-- if that was their perogative.
__________________
"The choices we make reveal the true nature of our character."
Reply With Quote
  #284  
Old 12-27-2010, 01:46 PM
houston houston is offline
Isaiah 56:4-5


 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 11,307
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

anyone see that movie bout the guy in the army who falls in love with a tranny? a homophobic soldier takes a baseball bat to his head while he is sleeping. based on a true story.
Reply With Quote
  #285  
Old 12-27-2010, 02:21 PM
canam canam is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,270
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII View Post
Yeah, his wife ...
Nice try, BTW your avatar is racist,cant believe JD hasnt picked up on that,Just saying !
Reply With Quote
  #286  
Old 12-27-2010, 03:29 PM
Mr. Smith's Avatar
Mr. Smith Mr. Smith is offline
Best Hair on AFF


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

I haven't done any posting a quite a while....just got bored with the same ole fights about the same ole things. But this discussion brings me back in every time. It's one of my favorite issues here on the Forum because it is so volatile.

And SO important.

I know there are some of you that see gays as this militant, hateful, angry, aggressive group of people working in a manipulative way to force their ideals on others. NOTHING could be further from the truth.

I've been in "Community" with many gay people and I have only met, 100%, people who simply desire to live a quite life and be "Normal." I'm sure that are some "crazies" in the group, as there are in every group.

And for those who think that gays are proud, cocky, in-your-face, and arrogantly embracing of their lifestyle, I have never met a gay person who has not frequently considered suicide, and I have never had a friendship with a gay person who has not attempted it at least once.

Bottom line? Gay people need Jesus. And when I say that, I'm not saying, "They need Jesus for their homosexuality", I'm saying, "They need Jesus for their lives, their souls, their emotions, their pasts and their futures." They need Jesus just like everyone else does.

For us, as Christians, to single them out and seek to deprive ONLY them of their American civil rights is to take a bigoted, exclusionary position...and it's not right.

If we are going to seek to segregate out of normal society, people who are gay, then we must ALSO segregate out of normal society every other person who does not measure up to our guidelines....in other words, anyone who is committing actions that we consider "Sin", must be quarantined out of the military, The Church, The sanctity of marriage, etc....we must loudly proclaim their "error" just as much as we proclaim the gay person's "error". If we don't, we're bigoted. I'm not sure how it can be viewed any other way.

And if you're afraid to take a public shower when a gay person is present? Well, you have problems of a serious nature and need some counseling.
Reply With Quote
  #287  
Old 12-27-2010, 03:33 PM
Mr. Smith's Avatar
Mr. Smith Mr. Smith is offline
Best Hair on AFF


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by houston View Post
would not have posted a thing or two had I known he was a pastor. LOL LOL

I'd rather be talked to like I'm just another person....because I am. I don't wield the "pastor stick" and attempt to be treated differently. When I smash my thumb with a hammer it hurts, and often, I'll say something that's not very nice. The pastors who don't feel pain and/or who don't ever say anything bad....well, they reached a super-human status I'm nowhere close to.

That's a long explanation to say, you're more than welcome to talk to me however you like!
Reply With Quote
  #288  
Old 12-27-2010, 04:09 PM
aegsm76 aegsm76 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,121
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Smith View Post
I haven't done any posting a quite a while....just got bored with the same ole fights about the same ole things. But this discussion brings me back in every time. It's one of my favorite issues here on the Forum because it is so volatile.

And SO important.

I know there are some of you that see gays as this militant, hateful, angry, aggressive group of people working in a manipulative way to force their ideals on others. NOTHING could be further from the truth.

I've been in "Community" with many gay people and I have only met, 100%, people who simply desire to live a quite life and be "Normal." I'm sure that are some "crazies" in the group, as there are in every group.

And for those who think that gays are proud, cocky, in-your-face, and arrogantly embracing of their lifestyle, I have never met a gay person who has not frequently considered suicide, and I have never had a friendship with a gay person who has not attempted it at least once.

Bottom line? Gay people need Jesus. And when I say that, I'm not saying, "They need Jesus for their homosexuality", I'm saying, "They need Jesus for their lives, their souls, their emotions, their pasts and their futures." They need Jesus just like everyone else does.

For us, as Christians, to single them out and seek to deprive ONLY them of their American civil rights is to take a bigoted, exclusionary position...and it's not right.

If we are going to seek to segregate out of normal society, people who are gay, then we must ALSO segregate out of normal society every other person who does not measure up to our guidelines....in other words, anyone who is committing actions that we consider "Sin", must be quarantined out of the military, The Church, The sanctity of marriage, etc....we must loudly proclaim their "error" just as much as we proclaim the gay person's "error". If we don't, we're bigoted. I'm not sure how it can be viewed any other way.

And if you're afraid to take a public shower when a gay person is present? Well, you have problems of a serious nature and need some counseling.
MS - I've been around "alternate lifestyle" folks for quite a while. I have never had anymore problems with them, then with anyone else. As a matter of fact, I received a company award, that the main person who recommended me was lesbian.
I do not believe they are any more sinners, than anyone else. I do believe that we have missed some opportunities as churches, to witness to them, because we have somehow regarded their sin as worse than others.
However, with that said, the overall movement leadership is filled with those who are far more radical. On a corporate company basis for a fortune 100 company, I have seen this move from toleration to acceptance to praise and it is rapidly moving into the join us phase.
The problem with all of this is that we are not far away from where it will be a crime for a pastor to preach against this from the pulpit. If you do not believe me, look at Canada and Europe. There are numerous examples.
Also, there are numerous cases in Europe where the government is suing private indivuals for refusing to provide their services to homosexuals.
I have not had time to look them up, but there are cases about a photographer who refused to take pictures of a homosexual wedding, bed and breakfast operators who refused to let homosexuals stay there, and adoptive/foster parents who either had their children removed or their certifications taken away because they believed that homosexuality was wrong.
That's where we are headed.
Reply With Quote
  #289  
Old 12-27-2010, 04:32 PM
Truthseeker's Avatar
Truthseeker Truthseeker is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,888
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710 View Post
They being who?

If your talking about the SC it is because they didn't legislate it, Congress did and they (SC) declared that it was indeed constitutional for them to regulate it.

"Polygamy has always been odious among the northern and western nations of Europe, and, until the establishment of the Mormon Church, was almost exclusively a feature of the life of Asiatic and of African people. At common law, the second marriage was always void, and from the earliest history of England polygamy has been treated as an offence against society...."

Reynolds v. US
That seems so confusing, regulate polygamy but not same sex marriage. What part of constitution gives gov right to regulate polygamy?
__________________
Today pull up the little weeds,
The sinful thoughts subdue,
Or they will take the reins themselves
And someday master you. --Anon.


The most deadly sins do not leap upon us, they creep up on us.
Reply With Quote
  #290  
Old 12-27-2010, 05:00 PM
Mr. Smith's Avatar
Mr. Smith Mr. Smith is offline
Best Hair on AFF


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aegsm76 View Post
MS - I've been around "alternate lifestyle" folks for quite a while. I have never had anymore problems with them, then with anyone else. As a matter of fact, I received a company award, that the main person who recommended me was lesbian.
I do not believe they are any more sinners, than anyone else. I do believe that we have missed some opportunities as churches, to witness to them, because we have somehow regarded their sin as worse than others.
However, with that said, the overall movement leadership is filled with those who are far more radical. On a corporate company basis for a fortune 100 company, I have seen this move from toleration to acceptance to praise and it is rapidly moving into the join us phase.
The problem with all of this is that we are not far away from where it will be a crime for a pastor to preach against this from the pulpit. If you do not believe me, look at Canada and Europe. There are numerous examples.
Also, there are numerous cases in Europe where the government is suing private indivuals for refusing to provide their services to homosexuals.
I have not had time to look them up, but there are cases about a photographer who refused to take pictures of a homosexual wedding, bed and breakfast operators who refused to let homosexuals stay there, and adoptive/foster parents who either had their children removed or their certifications taken away because they believed that homosexuality was wrong.
That's where we are headed.

I understand what you're saying and I completely agree with your statement that I bolded. I also understand where "they" are coming from, and that simply is, attempting to gain access to the mainstream. For this, I don't blame them. If I were in this position, I would be doing the same.

Do some take it too far and become too objectionable? Of course.

As for arriving at the place where it becomes a crime to proclaim from the pulpit that homosexuality is a sin.....first of all, I rarely yell out from the pulpit identifying sins. My job is to feed, encourage, and lead people to a place of desiring a spiritual journey. I'm confident of this...if I can introduce people to Jesus Christ, He will take care of all the sins, infirmities, and issues that I'm unable to resolve in the first place. I have far more faith in Jesus than I do in myself and my ability to make someone aware of things in their lives that need to change.

Second...call me naive, but I don't see that happening (making it illegal to speak against that particular issue). I could go into all the reasons, but if pulpit speech were ever limited in this country, I can't imagine the uprising, even from groups like the ACLU. But even if you're right...so be it. The power of the gospel doesn't depend on our governments restrictions or potential restrictions.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DADT will still be enforced. coadie Political Talk 21 11-18-2010 05:38 PM
California AG urges court to repeal prop 8 Praxeas The Newsroom 4 12-20-2008 07:42 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Praxeas
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.