Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #271  
Old 02-09-2012, 07:21 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: Rejoicing In the Sabbath:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
You never answered my questions. They are easily answered if you recall that the Law of God was placed inside the ark under the mercy seat...and the Law of Moses was place in the side of the ark. The Law of God was written by God Himself on tables of stone, signifying their enduring nature. The Law of Moses was written by Moses on parchment, signifying their temporary nature. Notice...they were SEPARATED. Notice they are DISTINCT. The Law of Moses was for the nation of Israel, the moral Law of God is for all mankind, defining sin, until the end of the age.
I am stepping back further and showing the overall issue of the two trees seen between Grace and Law. It is LAW -- any Law -- that is self urging self to avoid the evil and do the good. It is the difference between one finding oneself doing the will of God without having resorted to a codebook to do it, because one's nature has been changed. THAT is actually what it means to have the law written in our hearts. It is the nature being changed.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #272  
Old 02-09-2012, 07:22 PM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Reverend Blume,

I'll illustrate my point...

Can a married couple be "Christian swingers"?

If so, why?
If not, why not?

Last edited by Aquila; 02-09-2012 at 07:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #273  
Old 02-09-2012, 07:22 PM
Titus2woman Titus2woman is offline


 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,485
Re: Rejoicing In the Sabbath:

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbyrd009 View Post
Ha, I have no idea where that came from. My userpage will answer everything but "single," lol.

See, I am not even half way computer smart, LOL! I guess I didn't think about 'user page' because I would never think to look

Off to see... I guess: you are male, middle aged, tall...

or... a teen girl
Reply With Quote
  #274  
Old 02-09-2012, 07:24 PM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume

I am stepping back further and showing the overall issue of the two trees seen between Grace and Law. It is LAW -- any Law -- that is self urging self to avoid the evil and do the good. It is the difference between one finding oneself doing the will of God without having resorted to a codebook to do it, because one's nature has been changed. THAT is actually what it means to have the law written in our hearts. It is the nature being changed.
So we have no "law" written upon our hearts. Hmmmm
Reply With Quote
  #275  
Old 02-09-2012, 07:28 PM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Rev. Blume, no one is talking about being justified or saved by the Law. We are talking about sanctification and transgression.
Reply With Quote
  #276  
Old 02-09-2012, 07:32 PM
houston houston is offline
Isaiah 56:4-5


 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 11,307
Re: Rejoicing In the Sabbath:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
Rev. Blume, no one is talking about being justified or saved by the Law. We are talking about sanctification and transgression.
and you accused someone of teaching others to break the commandments.
Reply With Quote
  #277  
Old 02-09-2012, 07:48 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: Rejoicing In the Sabbath:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
CONTINUED...
What’s a Jew to do in the northern arctic regions?! LOL
I thought you said everyone should keep seven day sabbath.

Quote:
I have a few questions for you….

Rev. Blume,

John wrote:
1 John 3:4
Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
Sin is defined as being “transgression of the law”. Can you tell me what “law” John is writing about? The Law of Moses or the Law of God?
Law is Law. Even God called Moses' Law the Law of God.
Joshua 8:31 KJV As Moses the servant of the LORD commanded the children of Israel, as it is written in the book of the law of Moses, an altar of whole stones, over which no man hath lift up any iron: and they offered thereon burnt offerings unto the LORD, and sacrificed peace offerings.

Joshua 24:26 KJV And Joshua wrote these words in the book of the law of God, and took a great stone, and set it up there under an oak, that was by the sanctuary of the LORD.
Quote:
Is the “Law” carnal, or spiritual???
HEB. 7:16 Who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, but after the power of an endless life.

Spiritual
ROM. 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
Yes, but WHY did Paul say the Law was spiritual? You are missing context.

Paul was citing Mosaic Law when he wrote both passages you noted above. As I showed, this was Law of God, anyway. In Romans 7, Paul explained how law came to him as a young JEWISH man at his bar Mitzvah, when Jews were responsible of the Law. Law was ordained to LIFE but Paul found it to be unto DEATH (Rom. 7:10). It was Mosaic Law that was said to cause them to LIVE through obedience to it (Lev 18:5).

Paul learned that a force called SIN was in his life, since whenever he put forth human effort to obey that law, that force stirred up inside him and caused him to do what he did not want to do. He sinned instead of did the good that the law urged him to do. This is how Paul learned we have SIN IN OUR FLESH, even after we are saved.

Paul hypothetically asked the reader if that mean the law was evil. Of course not. The problem was not with LAW, but with US! We have sin in our flesh! And when we urge flesh to do good, sin in that flesh is stirred up and we put ourselves, through such efforts, under the bondage of sin. That is serving God in oldness of the letter. It fails everytime.

It matters not if someone is seeking to justify themselves with it or not. The point is that keeping a law is urging self to obey a commandment in the power of flesh. And that stirs sin up in us. The only way to leave sin dormant is to stop urging flesh to obey commandments of any kind. Instead, serve in newness of the Spirit by following Romans 6:13.
Romans 6:13 KJV Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God.
We yield ourselves to sin when we use human effort to serve God. Walking after the flesh is not adultery and murder and lying, etc., in the context of Romans 6-7. It is trying to do the will of God by resorting to rulebook christianity. It is devoid of Spirit empowerment by faith,as Romans 6:13 encourages.

So, Paul said the Law is quite spiritual itself, even though it is a carnal commandment due to its urgings to get us to perform carnal deeds! Law would WORK if man did not have SIN IN HIS FLESH. Sin in the flesh stirs up like a monster aroused every time we use flesh to do good and keep a rule.

Quote:
Does the “Law” judge no man, or does the “Law” judge all men?
COL. 2:14-16 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it. Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:

JAM. 2:10-12 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law. So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.
You are missing the purpose in God sending Law. Paul said God sent law TO PROVE MAN CANNOT LIVE BY RULES. We fail everytime. God knew we would fail, but we did not know that.

Think of God bringing the salvation of grace immediately after Adam blew it and God stepped in back in Genesis 3. God says I will justify you freely by faith. Adam would respond saying, "Thanks, God. But I think I can do it myself."

But give man a law like God did to Israel for 1,500 years,and see how MAN CANNOT KEEP LAW, then give man the salvation by grace. MAN WOULD GRAB IT! He would have learned he cannot keep laws due to sin in his flesh, no matter how much he tries to please God with works of obedience. This is how Law was a schoolmaster to bring Israel to Christ!

The Law of liberty is not the Law of God. The law of liberty is the same law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus, which is basically Romans 6:13.

Quote:
Is the “Law” contrary to us, or is the “Law” not grevious?
COL. 2:14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross.

1 JOHN 5:3 For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.
Is there no perfection in the “Law”, or is the “Law” perfect?
You are again missing the forest for the trees. ANY LAW that is commandments for us to obey is not what God wants for us.

The law of God that John referred to was those of Jesus! His yoke is easy!

Quote:
HEB. 7:19 For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.

PSALMS 19:7 The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple.
They are one and the same Law in both verses! The difference you are missing is that the one verse in Hebrews shows that man could not comply to law. The Psalm is saying the law is perfect in itself. But the flaw in the context of Hebrews 7 is that MAN CANNOT CONTINUE IN IT, or in other words, cannot keep it.

Quote:
Did the “Law” end, or will it endure until the eternal state?
[INDENT]EPH. 2:15 Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace.

LUKE 16:17 And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.
You miss the context of Luke 16 also. Read the passage:
Luke 16:16-17 KJV The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it. (17) And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.
Notice the LAW WAS UNTIL JOHN. It stopped with JOHN. And then Jesus remarked that it is easier for heaven and earth to pass than for law to pass. In other words, John's ministry was so powerful that IT DID WHAT normally would never happen so long as heaven and earth existed!

Quote:
Lastly, God stated that He would write His “Law” upon our hearts. Is the Law of God written upon our hearts to obey its precepts, or is the “Law” no longer applicable under the New Covenant?
Law written in our hearts is OUR NATURES CHANGED. In other words, God does through Christ and the Spirit in our lives WHAT LAW COULD NOT DO by us resorting to it on paper. He caused us to walk in His statutes by divine empowerment of the Spirit.

LAW had the goal of creating true faith, love from a pure heart and a good conscience.
1 Timothy 1:5 KJV Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:
But law could not accomplish that in us. It was perfect in itself, but imperfect in being unable to relate to us a change.

So God did in GRACE what Law (the same law in context that was spiritual) could not do:
Romans 8:3-4 KJV For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: (4) That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
And the very things that Law tried to instill within man, and could not, were instilled in us BY GRACE!
1 Timothy 1:14 KJV And the grace of our Lord was exceeding abundant with faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.
Quote:
Jeremiah 31:33
33But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Without drawing a distinction between the Law of God and the Law of Moses we have utter confusion.
No we do not.


Without seeing the common denominator of ANY LAW WRITTEN IN LETTERS for us to read and obey is flesh urging flesh. And though such a law be perfect in and of itself, humankind cannot keep it since sin is in the flesh. That sin stirs up when self tries to improve self.

Without seeing the difference between ANY OBEDIENCE-DEMANDING LAW and Grace, shown in the two trees in the Garden, one will be lost in legalism.

Quote:
This is why we have so many silly standards with no moral compass. What you are proposing is an Antinomianist heresy. We need a sure standard. Again, John wrote:
1 John 3:4
Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
That verse only shows what sin is. That is what law -- ANY LAW -- came to do. Show sin..

Quote:
What “law” is John speaking about? The Law of God, the Ten Commandments. This is the opinion of the early church including the Ante-Nicene Fathers:
Again, missing the forest of LAW for the trees of distinctive laws.

Quote:
Repent Rev. Blume. You’re making the Word of God of none effect through your Antinomian doctrine. Without a sure standard for sin (a law whereby we might know sin) we are lost on a sea of relativism that leaves us in bondage to the arbitrary whims of legalistic pastors.
Oh please.

lol

Learn grace, bro. Get out of self making-self better by resorting to code books. That is oldness of the letter!
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."

Last edited by mfblume; 02-09-2012 at 08:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #278  
Old 02-09-2012, 07:50 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: Rejoicing In the Sabbath:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
So we have no "law" written upon our hearts. Hmmmm
Yes we do, but not in the way you propose whatsoever. Law written in our hearts CAUSES us to do good by changing our natures.

Picture it as GOD CHANGING YOUR DESIRES and you will see what it means for Him to write his laws in our hearts.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #279  
Old 02-09-2012, 07:54 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: Rejoicing In the Sabbath:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
Reverend Blume,

I'll illustrate my point...

Can a married couple be "Christian swingers"?

If so, why?
If not, why not?
You are consistently missing the forest for the trees.

Obedience-demanding laws that are carried out through human will power making oneself do good and avoid evil are correct in what they say are good and evil. LAW shows what sin is.

But law keeping is not the answer for those things.

The common response to what I am saying is exactly what Paul faced, and what caused him to repeatedly write hypothetical questions to his words with answers showing how the people easily miss this truth.

Shall we sin because we are not under the law but under grace? GOD FORBID!

I am saying the GOOD that Law tried, but failed, to cause man to do, and the evil which law tried, but failed, to get man to avoid are things GRACE empowers us to not do. Grace agrees with law.

What do you think Paul meant when he said Grace establishes the Law -- while having said Law was weak through the flesh to accomplish its ends?

But we are empowered to do good and not do evil ASIDE FROM resorting to rule books to obey. It is simply a reliance on the Spirit to empower us to do good. Relying on codebooks is walking after the flesh to serve God. Reliance on the Spirit to empower us to do His will, without resorting to rulebooks, is walking after the Spirit to serve God.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."

Last edited by mfblume; 02-09-2012 at 08:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #280  
Old 02-09-2012, 08:05 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: Rejoicing In the Sabbath:

Law is like the MIRROR that shows you the dirt on your face.

Grace agrees with Law and is the water and soap and facecloth to remove the dirt that Law showed you was there. Therefore, sin is transgression of the law. But the answer is not having Law and that's it. Grace comes in and deals with the dirt by divine empowerment that Law never had. The law is perfect and correct. But it is weak to accomplish its ends because of our flesh that houses sin.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Sabbath Day, Should You Keep or not Keep? Bruce Klein Deep Waters 788 01-12-2021 05:41 PM
Remember the Sabbath day *AQuietPlace* Fellowship Hall 37 10-05-2012 08:55 AM
What About The Sabbath ? By Charles Halff. Scott Hutchinson Fellowship Hall 4 12-16-2007 04:01 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.