Sen. Ted Cruz Makes It Official

[Walks_in_islam]

What i really like about Cruz is his representation of the Chinese Shandong Rubber Company in the patent infringement lawsuit against them. His stand as representative of a foreign company who stole intellectual property from an American company really tells me that though he stands for Israel and commie chinese he does not stand for America, American jobs, or for me.

Thank goodness he and his commie Chinese thieving clients lost both the case and the appeal. THAT was a win for America that found Cruz on the wrong side.

Representing commies against American workers is called aiding the enemy. Cruz is a traitor.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

What i really like about Cruz is his representation of the Chinese Shandong Rubber Company in the patent infringement lawsuit against them. His stand as representative of a foreign company who stole intellectual property from an American company really tells me that though he stands for Israel and commie chinese he does not stand for America, American jobs, or for me.

Thank goodness he and his commie Chinese thieving clients lost both the case and the appeal. THAT was a win for America that found Cruz on the wrong side.

Representing commies against American workers is called aiding the enemy. Cruz is a traitor.

1) Ted Cruz was a private lawyer, working in a major law firm, on a team of lawyers who were handling this case. Ted Cruz did not handle the trial, nor did he even argue the appeal. The most Ted Cruz did with this case was to help edit the appellate briefs.

2) The "American" company isn't even an American company. The businessman is an American, but a check of the case shows that he stated under oath he's partnered with a Chinese company, GTC which manufactures all his products. His company, per his statement under oath, "does no manufacturing whatsoever."

Cruz isn't a traitor. Your post is false and misleading.

[shazeep]

(hmm a lawyer who isn't a traitor...no oxymoron there, eh? )

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

1) Ted Cruz was a private lawyer, working in a major law firm, on a team of lawyers who were handling this case. Ted Cruz did not handle the trial, nor did he even argue the appeal. The most Ted Cruz did with this case was to help edit the appellate briefs.

2) The "American" company isn't even an American company. The businessman is an American, but a check of the case shows that he stated under oath he's partnered with a Chinese company, GTC which manufactures all his products. His company, per his statement under oath, "does no manufacturing whatsoever."

Cruz isn't a traitor. Your post is false and misleading.

Thank you, David. Your facts here are exactly right as this issue has been hashed and rehashed before.

And here is our bold Senator standing up for the Constitution once again against a new Attorney General who plans to carry on in the same way as her predecessor.

Ted Cruz SLAMS Republican majority in the Senate for allowing Lynch nomination

(video imbed)

He also adds that not a single Republican can vote for such a nomination and be consistent with their oath of office to support and defend the Constitution.

http://therightscoop.com/ted-cruz-sl...ch-nomination/

[Pressing-On]

EXCLUSIVE: Archive Evidence Contradict NY Times Anti-Ted Cruz Hit Piece
Evidence from the student newspaper of Princeton’s college newspaper shows that the young Ted Cruz was a defender of women’s rights and not the anti-woman oaf.


“Money should be spent on increasing proctor presence — especially in Prospect Gardens — and in an attempt to address the issue of date rape,” Cruz said to the Daily Princetonian in February 1991.

http://gotnews.com/exclusive-archive...ruz-hit-piece/

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by n david

1) Ted Cruz was a private lawyer, working in a major law firm, on a team of lawyers who were handling this case. Ted Cruz did not handle the trial, nor did he even argue the appeal. The most Ted Cruz did with this case was to help edit the appellate briefs.

2) The "American" company isn't even an American company. The businessman is an American, but a check of the case shows that he stated under oath he's partnered with a Chinese company, GTC which manufactures all his products. His company, per his statement under oath, "does no manufacturing whatsoever."

Cruz isn't a traitor. Your post is false and misleading.

Let's take a look together at what Cruz will take money for.

Businessmen who plead guilty to bribery. The businessman was Robert Mericle, who bribed two judges to give minors harsher sentences in the infamous “kids for cash” system. Why? To make money for his private juvenile detention center. Cruz lost the case, but he took home hundreds of thousands of Mericle's money

In another case, Cruz represented Moog, a company that fired a spokesperson for refusing to promote its pain control pump Accufuser for nonapproved purposes. Cruz argued in appeals court that the trial jury didn't fully analyze whether the company made the request. The appeals court found the evidence for illegal misconduct to be overwhelming, and Cruz lost that case too.

Cruz also made money from a case he argued in December 2011 on behalf of a Chinese tire company against charges that it illegally took blueprints from Florida businessman Jordan Fishman. Cruz failed to disprove the accusations. Last June, an appeals court upheld a $26 million jury verdict in favor of Fishman.

On the issue of the Chinese tire company -

In 2006, Jordan Fishman, an American inventor who designs mining tires, discovered that his patented designs had been stolen by an employee and were being used by two international tire distributors, the Al Dobowi Group of Dubai and Shandong Linglong of China.

In October 2009, Fishman filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the two companies in U.S. District Court in Virginia. Fishman won the $26 million suit which led the two companies to appeal the ruling, calling on lawyers from the international firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, where Cruz worked as an appellate lawyer, for legal counsel.

What was his role?

The technical term for Cruz's role is "counsel of record." According to legal definitions listed on the Cornell Law School website and others, lawyers who act as counsel of record are responsible for the representation of the client, regardless of whether they ever appear in a courtroom on behalf of that client. In an interview, Cruz said he has never appeared in any courtroom in regard to this case.

What did he do?

When his firm became involved, Cruz described his role as relatively minor: He says he edited the appellate briefs while the actual appeal was argued by three other lawyers.

He edited the briefs, briefs that other lawyers took to an appellate court to argue that it is in fact OK for a Chinese firm to steal intellectual property from the United States.

Edited: (def) Cruz took his little law-school trained fingers and wrote, in convoluted legalese, "Dear Judges: There is nothing wrong with a foreign company stealing intellectual property from a United States citizen and here are my stupid arguments as to why it is OK.

All three of the above were cases that Cruz lost. Not even close.

So to summarize:

Cruz, in writing, and before the courts, took money to say that it is OK to:

1. Bribe judges to give minors longer sentences so that the for-profit prison system can gain financial benefit
2. Fire an employee for refusing to market a pain pump for unapproved purposes so that a drug company can gain financial benefit
3. Steal intellectual property from the United States so that a foreign company can gain financial benefit.

As you say, it is a private law firm. Private law firms can pick and choose what and who they represent based on principle alone.

We need a president who does not offer American principles (and in one case American kids) for cash. We also need a winner, not a loser.

[Walks_in_islam]

Breaking news:

After a few weeks on the trail, the "Texas Firebrand" has achieved a solid positive unfavorable to favorable ratio with American voters. It is interesting to note that he is alone in this achievement.

Selling kids to private prisons and defending foreign businesses when they steal US patents, though unimportant to corn-pone Texas voters who need a red or blue button to save them the time of knowing anything about their candidates when they vote straight ticket, is not really connecting with the rest of America.

Cruz, who thinks this is unfair, is reportedly considering a class-action lawsuit against American voters, after which he will retire to Israel or China where they really appreciate the value of pay-for-service representation where the goods are awarded to the highest bidder.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-e...ReleaseID=2221

[Pressing-On]

Our resident anti-Semitic member hates Ted Cruz for his support of Israel so much that he doesn't check his facts - blowing smoke. Maybe he lives in Colorado where he gets his legal marijuana.

This is where some of that $32 million was spent - attack ads - that didn't work in the Senate race against Dewhurst and Ted Cruz.

David Dewhurst says Ted Cruz represents a Chinese company found guilty of stealing U.S. blueprints
Our ruling

Matteis’s comment about the word "guilty" strikes us as valid; viewers might take "guilty" in Dewhurst's ad as hinting that Cruz represents someone convicted of a criminal act. This is not so.

Cruz is representing a Chinese firm found liable for stealing blueprints. We rate Dewhurst’s claim as Mostly True.

http://www.politifact.com/texas/stat...ts-chinese-co/

A Texas super PAC is airing a TV ad that features a distraught mother who says Ted Cruz, a lawyer, “should be absolutely ashamed of himself” for representing a key figure in Pennsylvania’s infamous “kids for cash” scandal.

It is possible that Fonzo is talking about how much her family is entitled to under the agreement reached between Cruz’s client (Mericle) and the victims. The Scranton Times-Tribune reported on Feb. 29 that a state judge approved the agreement and that it would pay juveniles sentenced by the two judges between $500 and $8,200. But Fonzo said her son served time in prison, and those children would receive at least $5,000 if they were imprisoned in one of the new prisons built by Mericle and at least $1,000 if imprisoned in another facility.

In either case, Cruz had nothing to do with the creation of the fund or how much it pays victims. He was not one of the attorneys listed on the agreement. If anything, Cruz’s only involvement in the case would have resulted in more — not less — money for victims.

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/tex...senate-runoff/

[Walks_in_islam]

Its good to know that even those Texas corn pone voters who need that red button to vote straight ticket acknowledge that Cruz represented both mentioned clients in both mentioned cases.
The dimmer voters can be identified by their slightly hurt and puzzled looks and "whats wrong with that" hand-wringing and though they try in every way to divert attention away from Cruz and even blame the victim, sort of like rednecks in a rape trial, even the dumbest, loudest, and most talkative of them, while howling about it, always validate these simple little facts:

1. Cruz represented these things
2. Cruz tried to argue to courts that these things are OK
3. Cruz's sleazebag clients not only lost their original cases, they lost their appeals

The best a Cruz supporter can do? "Foreign companies stealing intellectual property from America arent committing a CRIME.....so its ok to defend them..."

Yeah, no kidding - but it should be a crime. Under the leadership of a Ted Cruz it never will be. To me, being found liable for damages caused by stealing American inventions means you did something wrong. If you tried to defend that, and it was done by murdering red commies, then you're a traitor to America and American workers.

[Esaias]

Cruz is a distraction, along with every single other "candidate". People think the decisions are made in DC. Ha! They sure got y'all fooled.

Somebody play Disraeli Gears backwards and see if there's any hidden messages in there. Clapton was no dummy.