STARTLING! LARRY BOOKER'S Latest Message!!!(wait til you see this!!!)

[anapko]

[QUOTE=Praxeas;305710]If the wrong UPCI preachers end up on Radio it will be an embarrasment...if they end up on the internet....it will be an embarrasment..

Maybe the REAL problem with us is NOT TV....but the embarrasing ones among us and the UPC doing nothing about them.

BTW what if the RIGHT preachers get on TV?[/QUOTE]

Exactly Prax...the problem that the ultra-against-tv crowd has is what if the right one gets on and portrays a postive Apostolic gospel. They can't get away from the old school of doing things that it just irks them to even think of change.

[CC1]

I know Wanda Phillips. Wanda Phillips is a friend of mine. Larry Booker is no Wanda Phllips. Er...wait a minute. Wrong saying.

Actually I know both TLC and Wanda and I trust both of them implicitly. I don't know what was or was not said but I can tell you that in my experience by the time something gets repeated a couple of times, even by good honest people, a word or two can be changed that greatly changes what was actually said.

Originally Posted by crakjak

Nonsense, this sermon is demonizing those that support the Res.4 period. Plus trying to denigrate the Phillips previous actions in the process, if he is only trying to do what is best for his church, then he should just preach his interpretation of the WORD and leave everyone else out of it. This is classic trying to make his light brighter by dimming someone else's.

BTW, neither Wanda or Kenneth were there to bring context to his declarations, so his use of that information is just wrong.

Crak... I totally disagree with you. I suspect you knew that already. It comes as no surprise that you would disagree with this good man's message... I mean, after all, aren't you the one that don't agree that people will go to Hell, too?

Originally Posted by CC1

I know Wanda Phillips. Wanda Phillips is a friend of mine. Larry Booker is no Wanda Phllips. Er...wait a minute. Wrong saying.

I wondered when that would come... hehehe

[Jekyll]

Originally Posted by CC1

I know Wanda Phillips. Wanda Phillips is a friend of mine. Larry Booker is no Wanda Phllips. Er...wait a minute. Wrong saying.

Actually I know both TLC and Wanda and I trust both of them implicitly. I don't know what was or was not said but I can tell you that in my experience by the time something gets repeated a couple of times, even by good honest people, a word or two can be changed that greatly changes what was actually said.

You think my man Thad might have a few words mixed up??

[Jekyll]

Originally Posted by Steadfast

Crak... I totally disagree with you. I suspect you knew that already. It comes as no surprise that you would disagree with this good man's message... I mean, after all, aren't you the one that don't agree that people will go to Hell, too?

Plese feel free. I think this needs a little attention.

http://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com...ead.php?t=9782

[Thad]

Originally Posted by Jekyll

You think my man Thad might have a few words mixed up??

I was wondering when that would come Hehehe

[Coonskinner]

Originally Posted by Dora

I'm still wonder what's the "pay off?" Not a literal money pay-off, but where in the world is this kind of behavior getting them? Do they really think they are getting a leg up on holiness or in with a richer more prestigious group of ministers? More power? More personal accolades? A bigger mansion in heaven??? What is it???

Sis, are you so thoroughly jaded and cynical that you think the only reason people do thinbgs are for money, accolades and prestige?

Is that what motivates you?

These men are walking away from a lot to remain true to their convictions.

As hard as it is for some of you more enlightened types to grasp, there are still men in this world who live according to principle and not expediency.

[Jekyll]

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

Sis, are you so thoroughly jaded and cynical that you think the only reason people do thinbgs are for money, accolades and prestige?

Is that what motivates you?

These men are walking away from a lot to remain true to their convictions.

As hard as it is for some of you more enlightened types to grasp, there are still men in this world who live according to principle and not expediency.

Great post...Yes yes yes! Very good, very good.

[bishoph]

Originally Posted by chaotic_resolve

The funny thing is LB wouldn't be much without his rantings against TV. The only reason he's known so well is because of his publishings and messages against television.

He should be thanking the UPC for both the debate and the vote for Res 4 that has given him a voice.

So my question is this: is LB going to allow TV and this vote on Res 4 to define his message and ministry, or is going to be better than that?

Thus far, this is dictating his ministry and message and that's pretty sad.

I'm not sure where you get your insight from, however, the reality is that LB is a quite well known and respected conference/campmeeting speaker in his own right. The TV issue is not what has made him popular/famous but rather his preaching and integrity to the message of truth that has garnered him much respect and some notoriety.

IMO it does not matter which side of the debate one may find themselves, the attacks on the character of men who stand on either side is unwarranted. Further, if one feels the need to launch these attacks, I think they are void of any substance on the issue and resort to such remarks out of ignorance or arrogance which are kissing cousins.