Awesome message about revival!

[shazeep]

yes, but his explanations can be viewed as self-serving.

if that seems like a harsh critique, understand that he focuses on critique also. It can at least be viewed as an attempt at a definition of how others are supposed to feel about a certain message. I cannot help but detect 'ego' in this, even if some of his observations might sometimes be true. "Are unrepentant sinners more likely to react adversely to the Holy Spirit as defined in parameters that they find disingenuous" is also a question that must be examined here, if it comes down to when I'm supposed to run around the congregation with my hands up, wadr.

[Michael The Disciple]

I agreed with the article. I think it would have been better understood if it was condensed.

[Esaias]

Nah, people need to read more. It's good for them.

Say no to fast food soundbyte culture!

[shazeep]

i just think it might be better to view any possible revival in more positive terms, rather than try to identify those who are not on the same wavelength for whatever reason.

[shazeep]

ok but i should also admit that i'm a defective in this area, and i might easily have seized upon some phrases as defining here that you do not. Obviously, i am clueless in most social situations. What impressed you in the article?

[obriencp]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Seriously, everybody ought to read the article.

Go on, I dare ya. Double dare you. Double-dog dare ya.

You'll feel... well, just read it. But you gotta read ALL of it, take your time...

I read it. Lengthy, wordy, but very good (i know, reading is good for you ).