What is worse...really?

[rrford]

Originally Posted by CC1

That was always my fear back at NFCF with all of the inflamnatory and insulting Coop threads.

Yet those never seemed to run the ultra cons off back then. I wonder what has changed now. I see less of those type threads here than I did at NFCF.

The difference is that it is not just Coop posting.

[Carpenter]

Originally Posted by CC1

That was always my fear back at NFCF with all of the inflamnatory and insulting Coop threads.

Yet those never seemed to run the ultra cons off back then. I wonder what has changed now. I see less of those type threads here than I did at NFCF.

The problem is there are many more Coop's around...and you know what you get if you have more coops.

[rrford]

Originally Posted by Carpenter

Who said anything about it NOT being Chocolate? Follow the initial premise, or your question/rest of the story is illogical!

My guage is not faulty, and you just filled up with diesel.

Carp, how in the world does it make sense then?
He eats chocolate. Finds out something about it not being scriptural, yada, yada, yada. Then is in agony because he cannont eat it again. please explain the parallel to me, 'cause it just ain't there from where I am.

You are trying to launch Apollo 37 using ethanol.

[Carpenter]

Originally Posted by rrford

Carp, how in the world does it make sense then?
He eats chocolate. Finds out something about it not being scriptural, yada, yada, yada. Then is in agony because he cannont eat it again. please explain the parallel to me, 'cause it just ain't there from where I am.

You are trying to launch Apollo 37 using ethanol.

I used a simple story for the simple minded to introduce the meat of my thread.

The first part has little or nothing to do with the second part, it was just an example.

What is worse, for a guy who has tasted to never be able to taste again, or the man who has experienced a longing but who will never have (or give himself) the opportunity to taste?

Both will probably never experience chocolate again in their lives, so which is worse...now go read the second part of my post.

You forgot to charge your hybrid.

[BoredOutOfMyMind]

Originally Posted by Carpenter

I used a simple story for the simple minded to introduce the meat of my thread.

The first part has little or nothing to do with the second part, it was just an example.

What is worse, for a guy who has tasted to never be able to taste again, or the man who has experienced a longing but who will never have (or give himself) the opportunity to taste?

Both will probably never experience chocolate again in their lives, so which is worse...now go read the second part of my post.

You forgot to charge your hybrid.

I am not following this progression from Chocolate to ethanol.

I can say that when we have posters posting UPCI ministers are less educated that a 5th grader, and others touting - they have now shaved; the intelligent posting is difficult to dissect.

[Carpenter]

Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind

I am not following this progression from Chocolate to ethanol.

I can say that when we have posters posting UPCI ministers are less educated that a 5th grader, and others touting - they have now shaved; the intelligent posting is difficult to dissect.

Boom, you are standing at the plate swinging after the custodian has already turned out the lights on the field.

I agree however with the second part. Fun is good. Being obstinate for obstinate's sake is bad.

We never had that dynamic at FCF, and if we did, it was extracted by the whole membership.

[mizpeh]

I think it is worse to get to heaven and to find out you are not saved when all the while on earth you thought you were.

So it's better to eat the chocolate and then not to do without, but find a better quality of chocolate.