What Difference Does it Make?? Is this Forum REALLY APOSTOLIC????? - Page 17

rrford · #**161** 03-06-2007, 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Felicity

*ahem*

I would pay attention to CS and RR. They aren't novices, they don't hate anybody and they know of what they speak. These two men both love people and care about them.

I think it's time to give them the benefit of the doubt and get off their case because they are being misrepresented.

Further, when a poster is allowed to state that I called them a liar at least 3 times when I did no such thing, and then for poeple to agree with her, is beyond my comprehension.

If Rhoni does not have the ability to read a post and see that questions are not accusations then there is nothing more i can do to explain it to her.

Further, I seriously, seriously doubt there is one thread I have ever started that I had the majority of posts on.

From reading some of the responses on this thread, her thread, and a couple of others it is evident some folks have a problem keeping their eye on the ball.

Just on instance: Some have said that Rhoni's thread was started seriously to help folk. Rhoni, at one point, said it was entertainement. Which is it? So far it is whatever is appropriate to respond to CS and I.

SDG · #**162** 03-06-2007, 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rrford

Further, when a poster is allowed to stae that I calle dthem a liar at least 3 times when I did no such thing, and then for poeple to agree with ehr, is beyond my comprehension.

If Rhoni does not have the ability to read a post and see that questions are not accusations then there is nothing more i can do to explain it to her.

Further, I seriously, seriously doubt there is one thread I have ever started that I had the majority of posts on.

From reading some of the responses on this thread, her thread, and a couple of others it is evident some folks have a problem keeping their eye on the ball.

Just on instance: Some have said that Rhoni's thread was started seriously to help folk. Rhoni, at one point, said it was entertainement. Which is it? So far it is whatever is appropriate to respond to CS and I.

The thread was set up as a individual blog ... in the blog section ... She gives advice to those that have sought her advice ... but some would love to interfere and give advice on her advice ... if you want to go into the cyber -counseling business start your own .... rather than hi-jacking a thread that is was designed for q and a.

rrford · #**163** 03-06-2007, 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

The thread was set up as a individual blog ... in the blog section ... She gives advice to those that have sought her advice ... but some would love to interfere and give advice on her advice ... if you want to go into the cyber -counseling business start your own .... rather than hi-jacking a thread that is was designed for q and a.

By the same respect then, why go to her thread and take issue with me?

SDG · #**164** 03-06-2007, 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rrford

By the same respect then, why go to her thread and take issue with me?

Oh ... you rather would ridicule with impunity ... and not be questioned. RR .. leave her alone ... it makes no sense to prolong this ... you made your point ... leave it alone.

rrford · #**165** 03-06-2007, 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

The thread was set up as a individual blog ... in the blog section ... She gives advice to those that have sought her advice ... but some would love to interfere and give advice on her advice ... if you want to go into the cyber -counseling business start your own .... rather than hi-jacking a thread that is was designed for q and a.

Daniel,

In all honesty, and quite sincerely, Felicity said alot when she spoke of "history." You do not have the luxury of understanding the history of the previous Forum's. I regret that but cannot change it.

Unfortunately, what you cannot seem to grasp is that I have no personal animosity against Rhoni, nor does CS. We do have great problems with what and how she espouses what she does. In fact, I have clearly stated that I support professional, Biblically based counselling. Some seem to keep missing that point.

I see little difference between your responses to posters you disagree with and our disagreement with Rhoni. That is my opinion and probably one you won't share. Just the way I see it.

It is unfortunate that even handedness does not abound. Defenders of one do not always defend when the one they are defending causes the offense. The way of life...

rrford · #**166** 03-06-2007, 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Oh ... you rather would ridicule with impunity ... and not be questioned. RR .. leave her alone ... it makes no sense to prolong this ... you made your point ... leave it alone.

Now see? How is this any different than any of my repsonses to her?

BoredOutOfMyMind · #**167** 03-06-2007, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

No I think your post speaks for itself once again ...

What makes you think that some men of God hear from God ... we are all priests ... if we have His Word ... we all have access ... UGHHHH!!!!!

This monopoly mindset sets you apart indeed.

So are you saying you no longer have need of anyone to be answerable to?

SDG · #**168** 03-06-2007, 11:50 PM

History is irrelevant in this matter .... in my opinion .. it's disrespectful to go into her blog and shred it .. period ... if you don't like her methodology ... open a blog to analyze Dear Rhoni ...