Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Badejo
Any updates PO?
|
So, because Trump's Director of Social media, Dan Scavino is harassing Amanda Carpenter on Twitter, Courageous Conservative PAC is asking for any screenshots to be taken that relates to the NE article and send it to them on their Facebook page.
As of yet, Ted Cruz doesn't want to get in the mud with Donald on this and have it the center of his campaign, so he is going about discussing issues as that is what the people want to hear. We can't stop and sue Donald for every outrageous thing he says or does. It is Donald's intention to take the people's eyes off his weakness involved the issues. Roll on, Ted!
https://www.facebook.com/CourageousC...esPAC/?fref=nf
OK #CruzCrew, you're going to want to SHARE/RT this detailed analysis of the ridiculous Enquirer piece. Here's our findings...
Despite using salacious words and phrases including "hooker", "romps", "dirt file", "sex-in-closet" and "prostitutes" they're all qualified with the words "claims", "supposedly", "rumor", "appears", "reportedly", "purportedly", "said to be", "alleged" and "may have" over and over.
The carefully written article does not state anything as fact but merely repeats unverified "claims" made by "a source."
And the three sources for the "news" story are "top political consultant" Roger Stone, who last won an election in 1988, a website called "The Political Insider" that was just formed and whose only "news story" was the one cited in the Enquirer, and a video from "Anonymous" claiming to "have video" alleging "dirty secrets" about Cruz.
We're not going to repeat the ridiculous allegations, but instead will discuss the weasel lawyer words used in each one to avoid libel to show how thin this all is.
#1: "rumors" (twice), "supposedly" -- SOURCE: "a snitch."
#2: "may have", "alleged" -- SOURCE: "a source."
#3: "apparently" -- SOURCE: "another snitch", "the source."
#4: "said to be", "may have had" -- SOURCE: "another insider"
#5: "purported", "supposedly" -- SOURCE: "the source."
Overall the article includes the following lawyer weasel words that make the statements essentially meaningless.
"Source/Snitch/Insider/Blogger" = 9x
"Rumor/Rumors/Stories" = 5x
"Report/Reported" = 4x
"Supposedly" = 3x
"Claim/Claims" = 3x
"Appears/Apparently" = 2x
"Purports/Purportedly" = 2x
"Leaks/Leaked" = 2x
"May Have" = 2x
"Said To Be" = 2x
"Alleged" = 1x
There's a total of 33 lawyer weasel words in this internet gossip rehash. Is it libel? Are repeating internet rumors about a public figure libel? That's a question for the attorneys. Our job is just to expose these frauds and the lowlife scum who reprint these disgusting rumors that no one publicly will put their name to.
Ted has denied this. So have three of the women who have come forward publicly to deal with this. One is looking at suing the Enquirer and hopefully the 33 lawyer weasel words aren't enough to inoculate this rag against an expensive civil judgment.
All of you need to publicly shame your remaining friends who still admit to supporting Trump. Show them no mercy. Abuse them publicly and boldly. Let them know you have no tolerance for anyone who continues to stand with Trump and his vile campaign of unsubstantiated crude personal attacks and internet rumors.
This is a rough primary campaign, but it's ok. Ted and Heidi are going to have to deal with all ........ this sooner or later. Let's get it out of the way now, beat Trump and his gang of gutter goons, and then we'll be rock solid when Hillary comes at us with her billions.
Thank you all for your support for Ted, for taking the time to read this to the very end, and MOST IMPORTANTLY, SHARING and RTing this post. AND DON'T FORGET TO POST IT ON THE PAGES OF YOUR FRIENDS WHO SUPPORT THE CRUDE BUFFOON KNOWN AS DONALD TRUMP!
#OnToCleveland #OnToVictory
The people solely responsible for that ad are the people who lead "Make America Awesome." Not Ted Cruz. Not Cruz's campaign. 
Linear Mode
