Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 04-15-2009, 02:32 PM
Ron's Avatar
Ron Ron is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,396
Re: Is There Valid Law Authorizing Income Taxes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
Apostolics pay there taxes!


there how is that?
I agree & said from the start I do!
I just asked if there was a law.
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 04-15-2009, 02:32 PM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Is There Valid Law Authorizing Income Taxes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710 View Post
No he can't amend and appeal. You can amend the complaint prior to trial but you can't amend a complaint once a trial is complete, it is Res Judicata.

And an appeal cannot consider new evidence.

It may be true that a prosecuting attorney botched a case but that in and of it self proves nothing.
Baron,
You are SO in your element!
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 04-15-2009, 02:33 PM
nahkoe's Avatar
nahkoe nahkoe is offline
Mama to four little angels.


 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,053
Re: Is There Valid Law Authorizing Income Taxes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nahkoe View Post
Provide me with documentation to support this claim.
? A website, anything.
__________________
You become free from who you have become, by becoming who you were meant to be. ~Mark from another forum I post on

God did it for us. Out of sheer generosity he put us in right standing with himself. A pure gift. He got us out of the mess we're in and restored us to where he always wanted us to be. And he did it by means of Jesus Christ. ~Romans 3:24 from The Message
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 04-15-2009, 02:37 PM
Mercy Mercy is offline
I wanna live...


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 254
Re: Is There Valid Law Authorizing Income Taxes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron View Post
Property?

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

People are not property!
Before the amendment, people were property.
__________________
I am going to be better than I am today....(Phil 1:6)
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 04-15-2009, 02:43 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Is There Valid Law Authorizing Income Taxes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710 View Post
I don't think the judge was an idiot, its not his job to make the prosecutor's case.
Oh my. We have nothing here. Not a single thing. we have no idea if the judge gave the right instructions to the jury, we have no look at the evidence and none about the initial complaint. We have a story given by a juror and her enthusiasm in seeing a man that didn't comply with taxes show relief when the 4 counts were read.

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/592.html
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/pV.html

The juror asked questions of the judge which is also not proper other than clarifications of instructions to the jury.

The IRS can win around 95% plus of these cases.
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 04-15-2009, 02:46 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Is There Valid Law Authorizing Income Taxes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron View Post
I agree & said from the start I do!
I just asked if there was a law.
I have furnished them 2 times. Lack of reading on your part doesn't represent lack of law or evidence.\

You sure couldn't do a hearing pro se.
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 04-15-2009, 02:58 PM
jwharv jwharv is offline
Resident Insomniac


 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,222
Re: Is There Valid Law Authorizing Income Taxes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron View Post
Have you seen the film?

He interviews people from the IRS & asked to be shown the law authorizing income taxes he isn't shown the law---because there isn't one.
The Constitution

Amendment 16 - Status of Income Tax Clarified. Ratified 2/3/1913. Note History

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:15 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Is There Valid Law Authorizing Income Taxes?

A BRIEF HISTORY OF

U.S. LAW ON

THE TAXATION

OF AMERICANS ABROAD








1861 Congress enacts the Revenue Act of 1861 to pay for what is anticipated to be a short civil war. For the first time an income tax is levied at the Federal level in the United States. The rate of imposition is 3% on all incomes higher than $800 per year. (Revenue Act of 1861)).




1862 Congress enacts a new revenue act introducing for the first time a progressive tax feature. Personal income tax is 3% for income between $ 800 and $ 10,000 while higher incomes are to be taxed at a rate of 5%. A standard deduction of $ 600 is introduced, along with other deductions. Income tax is to be withheld at source by the employer. (Revenue Act of 1862).




1872 The income tax is abolished. (Revenue Act of 1872).




1894 The income tax is reintroduced. (Revenue Act of 1894).




1895 Supreme Court holds the income tax is unconstitutional since it is not apportioned according to the population in each state.




1913 The 36th State ratifies the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution thus rendering constitutional the establishment of an income tax. In October, 1913, the first income tax law is enacted requiring taxes to be paid on all "lawful" income. Less than 1% of the population is required to pay income taxes. (Revenue Act of 1913).




1914 First income tax returns filed on Form 1040. There are 357,515 taxpayers paying a total tax of $ 28 million. Tax per capita of all U.S. inhabitants is twenty-eight cents.




1916 Congress amends the law to remove the ambiguous question of what taxing "lawful" income means, and substitutes instead "from whatever source derived". In the new law, all income is taxable even if it is earned by illegal means. This new language also becomes the basis on which the taxation of overseas source income is included. (Revenue Act of 1916).




1917 Because of the expense of World War I, the Federal Budget is almost equal to the total U.S. budget for all the years between 1791 and 1916. The Congress enacts new tax provisions to lower exemptions and increase taxes. Amount of tax to be collected increases fourfold from $ 809 million in 1917 to $ 3.6 billion in 1918. (War Revenue Act of 1917).




1918 Efforts are made to exempt foreign source income from the U.S. taxation because of alleged competitive disadvantages suffered by American corporations operating branches abroad. (Hearings Before the House Committee on Ways and Means on the Revenue Act of 1918, 65th Congress, 2nd Session 648 (1918)).




A new revenue act is passed increasing taxes on incomes in excess of $ 1 million per year to a rate of 77%. The new act also introduces estate taxes and excess profits taxes. Still only 5% of the population has to pay income taxes. Americans working abroad are allowed to reduce their federal income tax liability with a tax credit equal to the amount of any foreign income taxes paid. Until 1918, all foreign taxes were treated as deductible expenses in the same manner as state and local taxes. (Revenue Act of 1918).




1921 Congress enacts a new tax law which is held to also apply to overseas Americans. Treasury Regulation No. 62 is issued applying the tax to overseas Americans under Article 3 of the Act, codified in Treasury Regulations, Section 1.1-l(b), T.D. 7332, 1975-1 C.B. 205,207. (Revenue Act of 1921).




A determined effort is made to exempt foreign income from U.S. tax in the case of U.S. Corporations that derive 80% of their income from foreign sources. The Treasury, Commerce and State Departments favor the exemption, but it runs into determined opposition in the Congress. The provision finally passes in the House, but is defeated in the Senate. (61 Congressional Record 7023, 7026 (1921)).


The legislation is amended providing for an exemption for corporate income earned in a U.S. possession but not remitted to the United States. (Revenue Act of 1921, Chapter 262, 42 Stat. 271 (1921)).




1924 In Cook v Tait, the Supreme Court upholds the Constitutionality of the taxation of Americans on their foreign earned income. The Court states:




"The principle was declared that the government, by its very nature, benefits the citizen and his property wherever found and, therefore, has the power to make the benefit complete. Or to express it another way, the basis of the power to tax was not and cannot be made dependent upon the situs of the property in all cases, if being in or out of the United States, and was not and cannot be made dependent upon the domicile of the citizen, that being in or out of the United States, but upon his relation as citizen to the United States and the relation of the latter to him as citizen. The consequence of the relations is that the native citizen who is taxed may have domicile, and the property from which his income is derived may have situs, in a foreign country and the tax be legal - the government having power to impose the tax." (Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47(1924)).




1926 After expressions of great concern in the Congress about the competitive handicap caused to U.S. citizens and U.S. corporations abroad, legislation is enacted giving full exclusion of overseas income from U.S. taxation if an American citizen is absent from the United States more than six months in any calendar year. (Revenue Act of 1926, Chapter 27, Section 213(b)(14), 44 Stat. 9 (1926).




1932 Taxes were cut five times in the 1920's. The onset of the depression creates a need for new revenues. In 1932, only $ 1.5 billion is collected compared to $ 5.5 billion in 1920. A new tax law is enacted raising tax rates and lowering exemption levels.




The foreign earned income exclusion is taken away from the gross income definition section and becomes codified in I.R.C. Section 116, Exclusion from Gross Income. The law expands the applicability of the foreign earned income exclusion by permitting profit derived from a trade or business into which both personal services and capital have been injected to be considered 20% income and eligible for exclusion. (The Revenue Act of 1932, Chapter 209, Section 116(a), 47 Stat. 169, 204-05).




1933 Internal revenue collections amount to $ 1.6 billion.




1934 Congress narrows the applicability of the foreign earned income exclusion by denying use of the exclusion for income paid by the United States or any federal agency. State Department employees overseas and other Federal employees on assignment abroad lose their tax exemptions. (The Revenue Act of 1934, Chapter 277, Section 116(a), 48 Stat. 680, 712). (See also Senate Rep. No. 665, 72nd Congress, 1st Sess. 31 (1932)).




1936 Congress enacts a new tax law but retains the codified language of the 1934 Act. (Revenue Act of 1934, Ch. 277, Section 116(a), 49 Stat. 1648, 1689 (1936)).




1938 Congress enacts another new tax law but retains the codified language of the 1934 act. (Revenue Act of 1938, Chapter 289, Section 116(a), 52 Stat. 447, 498 (1938)).
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:19 PM
Ferd's Avatar
Ferd Ferd is offline
I remain the Petulant Chevalier


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 17,524
Re: Is There Valid Law Authorizing Income Taxes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710 View Post
I don't think the judge was an idiot, its not his job to make the prosecutor's case.
To be honest Baron, I am not even sure that there was a judge, jury, procecutor, or accused.


thus far, no one has proven that this really happened.


and honestly if it did happen, I dont know if the judge is an idiot, but it is possible... there have been a few... here in dallas from time to time we have seen some...
__________________
If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
My Countdown Counting down to: Days left till the end of the opressive Texas Summer!
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:21 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Is There Valid Law Authorizing Income Taxes?

1938 Congress enacts another new tax law but retains the codified language of the 1934 act. (Revenue Act of 1938, Chapter 289, Section 116(a), 52 Stat. 447, 498 (1938)).




1939 Total number of U.S. taxpayers is around 4 million.




1941 The 1941 Revenue Act lowers exemptions and increases taxes on excess profits being made on the war effort. Internal revenue collection increases to $ 7.4 billion. (The Revenue Act of 1941).




1942 The eligibility for exclusion of overseas income is tightened from the 6 months away from home rule to a "bona fide" residence rule for an entire tax year. (Revenue Act of 1942, Chapter 619, Section 148, 56 Stat. 798, 841-2 (1942)).














1962 Congress eliminates of the total exclusion for a "bona fide" foreign resident. A $ 20,000 per year overseas earned income exclusion is established, rising to $ 35,000 after three years abroad. Tax credit is given for taxes paid abroad on excluded income. The Act also introduces separate rules for "unearned income" abroad, and Subpart F rules for controlled foreign corporations. (Revenue Act of 1962, PL 87-834, Chapter 11, 76 Stat. 960(1962)). (See Conference Report No. 2508 of l October, 1962).










The Treasury Department makes a study of tax returns of 1968 and estimates that the revenue gain from enactment of total elimination of the foreign earned income exclusion would be $ 60 million. Enactment of the proposed 1976 Tax Reform Act is estimated to yield a gain of only about $ 40 million.







The Tax Court rules in a second Japanese housing case, "Stephens v. Commissioner", that the housing supplied by an employer to an employee was includable in the employee's gross income at its full local value, despite a specific finding that "quarters reasonably equivalent to (the taxpayer's) style of living were not available at American prices". (66 T.C. 226, (1976)).




1977 Following voluminous complaints from overseas Americans and their employers about the impact of the 1976 Tax Reform Act, Congress postpones the effective date from January, 1976 to 1 January, 1977. (Tax Reduction and Simplification Act of 1977, PL 95-30, Section 302, 91 Stat. 126 (1977)).




Treasury Secretary William Simon calls for consideration of using the residence principle for taxing international flows of income. ("Blueprint for Basic Tax Reform", Department of the Treasury, Washington, D.C., January 17, 1977, Chapter on International Considerations).




The Treasury Department carries out a comprehensive study of the 1975 tax returns filed by overseas Americans and finds that the tax impact of the Tax Reform Act changes were far greater than the Treasury or the Members of Congress had anticipated. Based on the study of the 1975 data, the Treasury determines that the revenue gain from the Tax Reform Act amendments amounted to $ 381 million in 1977, rather than the $ 44 million that Treasury had estimated based upon its previous study in 1976 using 1968 tax return data. Further, the 1976 Tax Court decisions increased the burden on overseas taxpayers by an additional $ 65 million in 1976, yielding a total increase of $ 383 million over 1975 reporting practice, or an average $ 2,700 per return. (U.S. Department of the Treasury, Taxation of Americans Working Overseas 8 (1978)).




1978 The General Accounting Office completes a two-part study of the impact of the Tax Reform Act changes. The first part is a non-scientific sampling of 367 firms employing Americans abroad. Eighty-five percent of the company officials surveyed believed that United States exports would decline by more than five percent as a result of the 1976 tax law and Tax Court decisions. The companies most severely affected were those operating in countries where living costs were high or where minimal taxes were imposed on foreigners. In the Middle East and Africa, Japan and Latin America tax increases were on average $ 4,700 per return.




The second part of the GAO study consisted of an econometric projection of the macro-economic effects of the Tax Reform Act changes and the 1976 Tax Court rulings. The GAO model assumed that there was a high in-elasticity of foreign demand for United States exports, and therefore the net effect of the 1976 changes would actually be an improvement in the U.S. balance of payments.










New IRS rules for taxation of Social Security Retirement benefits indicate that there will be a zero level of base income above which Social Security Benefits will be taxed (50% of the benefit will be taxable) for those who file as married filing separately. There is a dollar earnings base of about $ 20,000 for those filing a single return, and double this amount for married filing a joint return. This ruling will be especially harsh for overseas taxpayers married to aliens who have to file as married filing separately to exclude the non-resident alien spouse's income from taxation by the USA.




1986 Congress passes the "Tax Reform Bill of 1986" which introduces a number of significant changes affecting U.S. citizens resident abroad. The section 911 foreign earned income exclusion is reduced to $ 70,000. Separate foreign tax credit limitations are introduced for passive income, high withholding tax interest, etc. Source rules are introduced to treat income from sales of personal property as U.S. source income for U.S. persons if such income is not taxable in the country of residence. The U.S. dollar is deemed by statute to be the "functional currency" of U.S. citizens for transactions other than those of a "qualified business unit". The new laws limit foreign tax credits for alternative minimum tax purposes to 90% of the alternative minimum tax before credits. This results in clear double taxation by legislative intent.




1988 Congress passes the "Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988" The Act eliminates the marital deduction for property passing from a U.S. citizen to a non U.U. citizen. An annual gift tax exclusion of $ 100,000 is introduced for gifts to non U.S. citizen spouses.




1989 Congress passes the "Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1989" which creates a separate foreign tax credit category for lump sum distributions from foreign pension plans. The law also confirms the denial of marital deductions for property passing from U.S. citizen to non citizen spouse overrides existing treaty provisions for taxable years ending more than three years after enactment.




1990 Congress passes the "Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990" which raises the maximum marginal tax rates and introduces "phase outs" of itemized deductions for higher income taxpayers.




1992 Congress passes the "Revenue Bill of 1992" which recognizes that Sec 988 of the 1986 Act which established the U.S. dollar as the "functional currency" for individuals had created an impossible administrative burden. Under the 1986 Act, an individual must measure gain or loss on each foreign currency transaction. The 1992 law provides for non-recognition of exchange gains in personal transactions for gains not exceeding $ 200.




Revenue Ruling 90-79 provides that a loss on a foreign currency mortgage cannot be used to offset taxable gain on the sale of a house in a foreign country. This was later upheld in court. In practice this works as follows: you borrow foreign currency to buy a house. You sell the house for less than you paid for it in the foreign currency. Yet, during the same time the dollar has appreciated so that the actual foreign currency loss looks like a dollar capital gain. You pay tax on the phantom income increase but cannot deduct the phantom loss. In reality you actually lost money, but you have to pay tax on a capital gain that never took place! Somehow this meets the cannons of tax fairness.




1993 Congress passes "The Revenue Reconciliation Bill of 1993" which raises the top regular tax rates from 31% by adding two new brackets of 36% and 39.6% The act also raises the maximum alternative minimum tax rates from 26% to 28%. It increases the portion of social security benefits that are taxable from 50% to 85% for high income taxpayers (who are defined as those earning $ 34,000 as a single person an $ 44,000 for a couple). The act also increases the amount of income earned by controlled foreign corporations that is currently taxable to U.S. shareholders.




1996 Congress passes the "Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996" which significantly changes the taxation of foreign trusts with U.S. grantors and/or beneficiaries. Congress also passes the "Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996" which states that individuals who have assets of $ 500,000 or more or income of more than $ 100,000 and who lose their U.S. nationality are deemed to have expatriated themselves for income tax avoidance purposes. Non U.S. citizens who have been long-term U.S. residents have comparable treatment.




1997 Congress passes the "Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997" which reduces taxes on long-term capital gains and estates. It also provides for a $ 500,000 exclusion of gain on the sale of a principal residence. The foreign earned income exclusion is increased by $ 2,000 per year (from 1998 to 2002) to a new maximum of $ 80,000 and indexes for cost of living increases after 2002.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Conservative With Valid Concerns ! 1Corinth2v4 Fellowship Hall 67 09-23-2008 12:15 PM
What Is Your Families Annual Income. Digging4Truth Fellowship Hall 98 09-02-2007 12:40 AM
How Many Here Are Two Income Families? Ron Fellowship Hall 19 08-10-2007 08:58 AM
All marriages valid? Arphaxad Fellowship Hall 10 03-06-2007 08:17 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.