Can you tell the difference between men's pants & - Page 10

dansamy · #91 08-01-2008, 06:07 AM

Jeans are utilitarian clothing. I realize they have completely taken over our fashion, but in essence, jeans are utilitarian clothing. I usually only wear them when I need to be doing something that would be difficult or immodest to do in a skirt.

BrotherEastman · #92 08-01-2008, 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Can you tell the difference between men's pants on a woman and pants made for women on a woman? How easy is it to tell?

For the most part I can tell the difference; however, at times I can't, especially with the jeans.

freeatlast · #93 08-01-2008, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman

For the most part I can tell the difference; however, at times I can't, especially with the jeans.

Amazing at how predictable we become on here. I saw you were te last post on this thread and thought to myself, I'll bet Easty says he can't tell.

BrotherEastman · #94 08-01-2008, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freeatlast

Amazing at how predictable we become on here. I saw you were te last post on this thread and thought to myself, I'll bet Easty says he can't tell.

Don't make me come over there.

Esther · #95 08-01-2008, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LUKE2447

yeah provactive for the most part.

Which ones? The men's or the women's or both???

LUKE2447 · #96 08-01-2008, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esther

Which ones? The men's or the women's or both???

mostly womens though men's can be bad as well. Womens are made for attraction sadly. Mens are more comfort than profiling your curves.

DividedThigh · #97 08-01-2008, 02:22 PM

easy, womens have a woman in them, and mens have a man in them, now there may be some question about the aforementioned mans man hood, but as a general principle this works, the only diff othere than that is fabric and cut, and for some color, lol

DividedThigh · #98 08-01-2008, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freeatlast

Amazing at how predictable we become on here. I saw you were te last post on this thread and thought to myself, I'll bet Easty says he can't tell.

nice fish free, and easty is predictable and silly, dt

TCSQ · #99 08-01-2008, 03:24 PM

Looked at the pictures must say that one of the big tip offs that these were WOMENS pants rather than MENS pants had to do with two things, number one the SHOES being worn in the pictures and two with the contour of the models figure, But as to the essential nature of the garment no real difference at all.

BUT now a new question that is along the same line but doesnt really bear creating a thread all its own.

IF we are to be consistent with the thinking that its wrong for a woman to wear that which pertains to a man, then isnt it courting the wrath of God to allow women to stroll around in the night with their husbands coat draped over their shoulders just because they're "COLD" ? Or does anyone have a BIBLICAL reason why wearing her husbands (definitely male apparel) is not wrong in that case.

(Wonder if we will ever get to the understanding that LAW mitigates LAW)

BrotherEastman · #**100** 08-01-2008, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DividedThigh

nice fish free, and easty is predictable and silly, dt

dt, I'm hurt.