Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > The Newsroom > Political Talk
Facebook

Notices

Political Talk Political News


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2008, 02:51 PM
deacon blues deacon blues is offline
Pride of the Neighborhood


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,166
What if the Pundits Were (Gasp!) Wrong?

A funny editorial from the Boston Phoenix. I hope its more than just a nightmare for Obama supporters, I hope its exactly how it transpires.

Quote:
October 23, 2008
Long National Nightmare
By Steven Stark

Last night, I woke up in a sweat. I'd had a very bizarre dream . . .

NOVEMBER 5 -- There was Wilson over Hughes. And, of course, Truman over Dewey. But there's never been a surprise in presidential politics like the one that awaited Americans this morning, who woke up to discover that, somehow, John McCain had been elected president over Barack Obama.

Not a single poll, tracking or otherwise, had McCain ahead. The articles had all been written: Michael Scherer of Time, "McCain's Struggles: Four Ways He Went Wrong"; Jonathan Alter of Newsweek, "We're Heading Left Once Again"; and Joan Vennochi of the Boston Globe, "That's It for McCain." To be fair to them, it was hard to find a single major pundit anywhere who predicted McCain would win -- though the astute Michael Barone, author of The Almanac of American Politics, did pen a column 17 days before the vote warning that a surprise was possible. Given Barone's credentials, someone should have listened.

Of course, Wednesday-morning quarterbacking is ridiculously easy, but in retrospect, what happened should have been crystal clear: Obama's lead was never as great as the media hype that accompanied it -- he only led by two to six points in some major tracking polls. In several of them, Obama tellingly never cleared 50 percent. (There was a larger-than-usual undecided vote.) And whether it was the so-called "Bradley effect" (suggesting a racial element to the vote) or something else, Obama performed last night exactly as he often had in the spring against Hillary Clinton: he ran below expectations.

Meanwhile, the tsunami of youth support for Obama never materialized. Instead, it was the over-65 crowd who turned out as if the election were a five-o'clock dinner special, and who voted in record numbers for their fellow senior citizen.

"It was fear of the known versus fear of the unknown -- and fear won out," quipped one McCain aide.

In the campaign's final days, as the financial crisis that had boosted Obama in mid September seemed to fade somewhat, McCain found his voice, constantly challenging Obama on taxes. In contrast, Obama essentially took victory laps, promising to "change the world" and drawing huge crowds. He outspent his rival exponentially; even General Colin Powell endorsed him. Meanwhile, his supporters freely gave self-congratulatory interviews to a willing media. The press reported his transition team was already meeting. Cabinet lists were drawn up. Newsweek wondered how "President Obama" would govern. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and other Capitol Hill leaders announced their ambitious plans for the first 100 days; Jesse Jackson promised that the country's policies toward Israel would soon change.

It was the "Feiler Faster Thesis," popularized by Slate blogger Mickey Kaus (and credited to author Bruce Feiler, who wrote Walking the Bible), in action. In an era of short memories and even shorter attention spans, it almost appeared as if Obama was already the incumbent. So, in a time of unrest, voters kicked that incumbent out -- after all of a month.

The ugly surprise
At first, it wasn't evident that something extraordinary was brewing last evening. The polls in Virginia closed at 7 pm Eastern time, and that race was too close to call (no surprise there) since, even though Obama was favored in the Old Dominion State, George W. Bush had carried it by eight points both elections.

But by 8 pm, it began to become apparent that the blowout some in the media and the Obama camp had been predicting might not be materializing. New Hampshire -- where pre-election polls had seen Obama up 10 points -- was too close to call, a repeat of what had happened almost a year before in the primary between Obama and Clinton. Missouri and Ohio were also too close to call, with McCain showing unexpected strength among working-class and Catholic voters. Just as in 2004, Florida was showing unexpected strength for the Republicans, despite the housing crisis. Then Minnesota began to report and, in a huge surprise, that race, too, was too close to call.

Eventually, McCain won New Hampshire, Florida, Missouri, and Ohio. And he sealed his narrow victory in the Electoral College by winning out west in Colorado -- and Nevada for good measure.

"Colorado was the key," said one GOP official early this morning. "It wasn't pretty, but we always thought we could surprise there. Bush won it by almost five points last time. And an anti-affirmative action proposition on the ballot brought out our voters."

Obama conceded around noon today, promising that, though the revolution he promised had been temporarily derailed, "we are the future." Right now, however, the immediate future belongs to John McCain.

Whoa, that was scary! Note to self: never listen to Limbaugh before bed time . . .
__________________

‎When a newspaper posed the question, "What's Wrong with the World?" G. K. Chesterton reputedly wrote a brief letter in response: "Dear Sirs: I am. Sincerely Yours, G. K. Chesterton." That is the attitude of someone who has grasped the message of Jesus.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-23-2008, 03:26 PM
Withdrawn Withdrawn is offline
Standing fast in liberty!


 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 798
Re: What if the Pundits Were (Gasp!) Wrong?

Wow! Let's pray!

I'm no fan of McCain, but a Marxist Obama presidency would be the beginning of the end for freedom as we know it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2008, 06:04 AM
OP_Carl OP_Carl is offline
arbitrary subjective label


 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fifth Brick Ranch on the left.
Posts: 1,640
Re: What if the Pundits Were (Gasp!) Wrong?

Quote:
Originally Posted by deacon blues View Post
A funny editorial from the Boston Phoenix. I hope its more than just a nightmare for Obama supporters, I hope its exactly how it transpires.
Quote:
"It was fear of the known versus fear of the unknown -- and fear won out," quipped one McCain aide.
It is not an irrational fear, but rather, a fear of that which is intentionally and conspiratorially KEPT UNKNOWN.


How sad it is for them. The people are completely DONE trusting them, and yet they continue on in oblivion.
__________________
Engineering solutions for theological problems.

Despite today's rising cost of living, it remains popular.

"It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried." - Sir Winston Churchill

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." - Sir Winston Churchill

"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." - Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-24-2008, 11:38 AM
commonsense's Avatar
commonsense commonsense is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: following the lewis and clark trail
Posts: 2,476
Re: What if the Pundits Were (Gasp!) Wrong?

I like good dreams............we can only hope!
__________________
"Le sens commun n'est pas si commun."
(Common sense is not so common.)
Voltaire

Common sense is genius dressed in working clothes.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

Common sense and a sense of humor are the same thing, moving at different speeds. A sense of humor is just common sense, dancing.
William James
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
This is so wrong! BoredOutOfMyMind Fellowship Hall 19 02-11-2011 08:02 PM
Is IT Wrong................................ IAintMovin Fellowship Hall 59 06-19-2008 06:06 PM
Why I Was Wrong, Too FRINGE_NUTTER Fellowship Hall 6 12-10-2007 08:15 AM
Why I Was Wrong Hoovie Fellowship Hall 81 12-09-2007 07:22 PM
Libs Right, Cons Wrong *Gasp*!!!!!!! Monkeyman Fellowship Hall 25 12-06-2007 12:07 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.