Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #481  
Old 06-02-2008, 12:26 AM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
Brother Epley

We are pretty cautious about what we watch on television. Most of the time when watching television we watch DVDs. And there hasn't been any hint of a desire to dress immodestly or wear women's pants in our church or in our family. Some of the newer women wear pants, but they normally come around.

We have wedding rings because those who don't wear them look like they're shacking up and living together. My wife's grandmother even thought we might be swingers or in a group marriage cult because wingers and a cult down in Mississippi also didn't wear wedding bands. When clearing up her mistaken notions she said, "She just didn't know why we didn't want others to know we were married." Our wedding bands are simple gold bands, no diamonds. We wear no other jewelry. Like a watch, dog tags, or medical alert bracelet our wedding bands are "functional" representing our marriage covenant. In today's world gays want to parade their marriages...why are we wanting to hide ours? I remember having to tell people we were married back when my wife was pregnant because people thought we were just shacked up. Once I was referred to as her "partner" by nursing staff, I spoke up and said, "Ma'am, I'm her husband." She said, "Oh, sorry. I couldn't tell you were married." The Bible says...

1 Thessalonians 5:22
Abstain from all appearance of evil.

I think not wearing a wedding band puts forth an appearance of loose living. I believe that to be closer to sin than wearing a wedding band.

As for hair. My wife's hair is very uneven in the back (partly due to the uneven style she wore when she came into the church) and we've discussed possibly trimming it to even it up so she doesn't look unkept when she wears here hair down. We're not talking about trimming her hair into a "style" or even short hair, because her hair is already so long she can sit on it. We're talking about just evening it out so that it doesn't look unkept.

So please, before casting your ultracon judgments around, calling me and my family "sad"... ask for a little clarification first.

Proverbs 18:13
He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.
Very Sad.
Reply With Quote
  #482  
Old 06-02-2008, 01:28 AM
StMark StMark is offline
Pot Stirrer


 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,102
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
Very Sad.
Aquila ?????
Reply With Quote
  #483  
Old 06-02-2008, 01:51 AM
FRINGE_NUTTER FRINGE_NUTTER is offline
BANNED MYSELF


 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 544
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShofarMan View Post
Hell is hell brother and not even a UPC membership card is going to be enough to save some.
A UPC membership card WON'T SAVE ANYONE!!!!! What's a card got to do with salvation?
__________________
Fighting the Devil NOT my brother.
Reply With Quote
  #484  
Old 06-02-2008, 06:52 AM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
Very Sad.
You and your wife like to look like you're shacking up?

Do you like having the internet, a place that is fully accessible to movies and clips of anything including the most vile videos that would never be found on TV?

You see nothing wrong with a woman of God looking like she's a mess when she should be representing Christ by being well kept?

This is why I left the ultraconservative wing of the movement. They always turn on you and attack you for something. Because it's all about being holier than the guy next to you. That my brother is what is so sad.
Reply With Quote
  #485  
Old 06-02-2008, 06:59 AM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Since pants were originally worn by Chinese women working the rice patties and hosiery was originally worn by men...wouldn't Eply be committing an abomination for wearing pants and not panty hose?

At any rate, I teach that women abstaining from pants is an issue of modesty and femininity for the Western culture we live in. With continued lessons on the issue I've seen very few dig in their heels, most begin wearing modest dresses and skirts.

Speaking of "heels" does your wife wear heels brother Eply? Did you know that women's heels were originally something worn in England by unwholesome women to provide their clients "access" while the woman was standing?

If you want to get down and dirty about standards...we can get there. But I think that would be counter productive. Let's make a deal...I won't judge you for letting your wife wear such an ungodly thing as lady's heels if you don't judge me and my wife for wearing a wedding band so people know we're not shacking up.

Deal?
Reply With Quote
  #486  
Old 06-02-2008, 07:14 AM
bkstokes's Avatar
bkstokes bkstokes is offline
Jesus is the Christ


 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,484
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Bro Epley

I have nothing against you sir, but I will say that your comments do not seem to engender love and/mercy (heavy matters), but despite.
__________________
If ye believe not that I AM, ye shall die in your sins. John 8:24

Mone me, amabo te, si erro

No real problem exists over the use of "The Name" in everthing else done in the Church. Why then should there exist great controversy over the use of the "The Name of the Godhead" in water baptism?
Kevin J. Conner The Name of God p. 92
Reply With Quote
  #487  
Old 06-02-2008, 08:11 AM
Falla39's Avatar
Falla39 Falla39 is offline
Wouldn't Take Nothin' For My Journey Now!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,358
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

In shady, green pastures, so rich and so sweet,
God leads His dear children along;
Where the water’s cool flow bathes the weary one’s feet,
God leads His dear children along.

Refrain:
Some through the waters, some through the flood,
Some through the fire, but all through the blood;
Some through great sorrow, but God gives a song,
In the night season and all the day long.

Sometimes on the mount where the sun shines so bright,
God leads His dear children along;
Sometimes in the valley, in darkest of night,
God leads His dear children along.

Though sorrows befall us and evils oppose,
God leads His dear children along;
Through grace we can conquer, defeat all our foes,
God leads His dear children along.

Away from the mire, and away from the clay,
God leads His dear children along;
Away up in glory, eternity’s day,
God leads His dear children along.

By George A. Young -1903


My late father said, "Adults do not like to be treated like children!

They will resent it".

Parents can and should correct/discipline their children early on. But

after they have reached adulthood, best leave to God to rebuke and

chasten. He knows how!

And I can feel the resentment of those who do not like for OTHER MEN

to try to correct them. We have six ADULT children who are married to their

original spouses. Our days of correcting/discipling our ADULT children

are over. If they ask for advice or opinions, we carefully/prayerfully

respond. Otherwise, we pray for them and their children. We also pray

for our children's spouses families. What a difference it has made.

I believe the church would do better if it would let the PARENTS raise

their own children. The parents would be better off to raise their OWN

children. Be responsible for what YOU birthed! Raise or train up your

children in the way they SHOULD go and when they are old (mature)

they will not depart from it. Raise them up in the fear and admonition

of the Lord. Then trust God with His part! You can't save them anyway.

In the church, just preach the Word. Sun. School teachers teach

the Word. Don't assume PARENTAL responsibility that is not yours.

That's not your place. It breeds problems!

No offence intended!

Falla39
Reply With Quote
  #488  
Old 06-02-2008, 08:16 AM
AmericanAngel's Avatar
AmericanAngel AmericanAngel is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Southwest, La.
Posts: 917
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Thank you Sister Falla!
__________________
Rom.8:38,39-For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither heigth nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to seperate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.


I AM the VOICE of REASON and SANITY around here!

I am now on FB and on the AFF's on FB!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
**** Are the NCO and AWCF "raiding" the UPCI or providing a "safety net"? **** SDG The D.A.'s Office 373 02-06-2012 01:01 AM
Has "Church" become a "Family Business"?? SecretWarrior Fellowship Hall 70 06-09-2008 08:41 AM
What Does "Joint" or "Fellow" Heirs with Christ? Praxeas Fellowship Hall 2 01-13-2008 02:12 AM
It seems the word "Seperation" varies as much as "Holiness" does??? revrandy Fellowship Hall 20 09-29-2007 12:39 PM
Seven kids get "it" or "Him" at youth camp Sherri Fellowship Hall 10 07-16-2007 01:57 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.