|
Tab Menu 1
Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fc50/8fc501651de0b890bc4eccc9fd6f4953678a9281" alt="Reply" |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4a02/d4a0242b3d1d4ec6d6af2055ff037ad6d71769ba" alt="Old"
05-30-2008, 08:20 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34235/34235016aef2104eac8aa5c315a0b7a938a9964c" alt="bkstokes's Avatar" |
Jesus is the Christ
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,484
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
My philosophy is if people want to live that why fine, but don't make into a test of spirituality. MANY believe that the stricter one is with type of stuff, then the holier you are. It is written that His blood is what sanctifies, not standards.
Apart from this,
Mark I think it is time that this issue go away. I disdain the fact that this would be oneness pentecostals calling card. A man I know, sincerely saw little difference between pentecostals and the FLDS (talking about dress). I didn't even try to go into the differences because really it is the same mentality (unscriptural subjection of women). One can really make the Bible say pretty much near anything (twisting and turning it) -- Look at the crazy posts that have been going on in the forum of late.
__________________
If ye believe not that I AM, ye shall die in your sins. John 8:24
Mone me, amabo te, si erro
No real problem exists over the use of "The Name" in everthing else done in the Church. Why then should there exist great controversy over the use of the "The Name of the Godhead" in water baptism?
Kevin J. Conner The Name of God p. 92
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4a02/d4a0242b3d1d4ec6d6af2055ff037ad6d71769ba" alt="Old"
05-30-2008, 08:24 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d74e4/d74e4bec001ef6d1e1a211e4e216588230fd8803" alt="StillStanding's Avatar" |
Beautiful are the feet......
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkstokes
My philosophy is if people want to live that why fine, but don't make into a test of spirituality. MANY believe that the stricter one is with type of stuff, then the holier you are. It is written that His blood is what sanctifies, not standards.
Apart from this,
Mark I think it is time that this issue go away. I disdain the fact that this would be oneness pentecostals calling card. A man I know, sincerely saw little difference between pentecostals and the FLDS (talking about dress). I didn't even try to go into the differences because really it is the same mentality (unscriptural subjection of women). One can really make the Bible say pretty much near anything (twisting and turning it) -- Look at the crazy posts that have been going on in the forum of late.
|
Good post!
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4a02/d4a0242b3d1d4ec6d6af2055ff037ad6d71769ba" alt="Old"
05-30-2008, 08:29 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34235/34235016aef2104eac8aa5c315a0b7a938a9964c" alt="bkstokes's Avatar" |
Jesus is the Christ
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,484
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by cneasttx
I decided I don't want to take the chance to be considered an abomination to the Lord.
|
I appreciate you sincere desire to be pleasing to the Lord. Nevertheless, we must ask the question -- what was the difference in dress in those days. If you go to your local Christian book store you may easily find many books on Biblical customs. The difference between the way a man dressed and the way a woman dressed was primarily ornamental. Both men and wome wore robe like attire. The difference consisted of the material used in the belts and the woman's robe had a fancier hem (sp?) to the robe. Don't believe me go check it out.
Here is a link that has some interesting points about seperate dress.
http://209.239.56.130/theopenheart/a...womenpants.htm
__________________
If ye believe not that I AM, ye shall die in your sins. John 8:24
Mone me, amabo te, si erro
No real problem exists over the use of "The Name" in everthing else done in the Church. Why then should there exist great controversy over the use of the "The Name of the Godhead" in water baptism?
Kevin J. Conner The Name of God p. 92
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4a02/d4a0242b3d1d4ec6d6af2055ff037ad6d71769ba" alt="Old"
05-30-2008, 08:34 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e3a8/9e3a8d3b6cf70ad414f31ae43197cadf4d0dafd3" alt="Cindy's Avatar" |
Forever Loved Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkstokes
I appreciate you sincere desire to be pleasing to the Lord. Nevertheless, we must ask the question -- what was the difference in dress in those days. If you go to your local Christian book store you may easily find many books on Biblical customs. The difference between the way a man dressed and the way a woman dressed was primarily ornamental. Both men and wome wore robe like attire. The difference consisted of the material used in the belts and the woman's robe had a fancier hem (sp?) to the robe. Don't believe me go check it out.
Here is a link that has some interesting points about seperate dress.
http://209.239.56.130/theopenheart/a...womenpants.htm
|
My response had nothing to do with what I wear or don't wear but that my spirit be right with God, should have clarified I guess. If it doesn't come from the heart it doesn't matter.
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV
He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV
Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4a02/d4a0242b3d1d4ec6d6af2055ff037ad6d71769ba" alt="Old"
05-30-2008, 08:34 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d74e4/d74e4bec001ef6d1e1a211e4e216588230fd8803" alt="StillStanding's Avatar" |
Beautiful are the feet......
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
For the record, I find it perfectly acceptable if a women chooses to wear only dresses. I admire their personal conviction and sacrifice.
The problem arises when they judge others by their own personal convictions. They separate themselves from other women of like faith that may not have the same convictions.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4a02/d4a0242b3d1d4ec6d6af2055ff037ad6d71769ba" alt="Old"
05-30-2008, 08:35 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75488/75488d4d3e77e90a5c9a1cf974ef6489958dbb5a" alt="Pressing-On's Avatar" |
Not riding the train
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkstokes
I appreciate you sincere desire to be pleasing to the Lord. Nevertheless, we must ask the question -- what was the difference in dress in those days. If you go to your local Christian book store you may easily find many books on Biblical customs. The difference between the way a man dressed and the way a woman dressed was primarily ornamental. Both men and wome wore robe like attire. The difference consisted of the material used in the belts and the woman's robe had a fancier hem (sp?) to the robe. Don't believe me go check it out.
Here is a link that has some interesting points about seperate dress.
http://209.239.56.130/theopenheart/a...womenpants.htm
|
It's more than that. It's finding our place and following the convictions we feel that God has placed in our own individual lives.
We can't even look back at the OT for this.
The world is in chaos, the church world is in chaos.
We just need to find where God wants us. I will also say when a person finds that place, for them, and it happens to be the UPC, we need to leave them and their convictions alone.
It's one thing to debate here, as we often do, but if someone feels that is what they need in their life to stand before God, we need to leave that alone.
Not everyone can live the same way. Not every person will have the same convictions. Some are stronger by personal choice.
We need to respect each person's decision and consecration.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4a02/d4a0242b3d1d4ec6d6af2055ff037ad6d71769ba" alt="Old"
05-30-2008, 08:36 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75488/75488d4d3e77e90a5c9a1cf974ef6489958dbb5a" alt="Pressing-On's Avatar" |
Not riding the train
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoman
For the record, I find it perfectly acceptable if a women chooses to wear only dresses. I admire their personal conviction and sacrifice.
The problem arises when they judge others by their own personal convictions. They separate themselves from other women of like faith that may not have the same convictions.
|
Pianoman,
Well said. I totally agree with you here.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4a02/d4a0242b3d1d4ec6d6af2055ff037ad6d71769ba" alt="Old"
05-30-2008, 08:37 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e3a8/9e3a8d3b6cf70ad414f31ae43197cadf4d0dafd3" alt="Cindy's Avatar" |
Forever Loved Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkstokes
My philosophy is if people want to live that why fine, but don't make into a test of spirituality. MANY believe that the stricter one is with type of stuff, then the holier you are. It is written that His blood is what sanctifies, not standards.
Apart from this,
Mark I think it is time that this issue go away. I disdain the fact that this would be oneness pentecostals calling card. A man I know, sincerely saw little difference between pentecostals and the FLDS (talking about dress). I didn't even try to go into the differences because really it is the same mentality (unscriptural subjection of women). One can really make the Bible say pretty much near anything (twisting and turning it) -- Look at the crazy posts that have been going on in the forum of late.
|
I don't think I have ever looked like the FLDS women.
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV
He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV
Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4a02/d4a0242b3d1d4ec6d6af2055ff037ad6d71769ba" alt="Old"
05-30-2008, 08:38 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e3a8/9e3a8d3b6cf70ad414f31ae43197cadf4d0dafd3" alt="Cindy's Avatar" |
Forever Loved Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On
It's more than that. It's finding our place and following the convictions we feel that God has placed in our own individual lives.
We can't even look back at the OT for this.
The world is in chaos, the church world is in chaos.
We just need to find where God wants us. I will also say when a person finds that place, for them, and it happens to be the UPC, we need to leave them and their convictions alone.
It's one thing to debate here, as we often do, but if someone feels that is what they need in their life to stand before God, we need to leave that alone.
Not everyone can live the same way. Not every person will have the same convictions. Some are stronger by personal choice.
We need to respect each person's decision and consecration.
|
Amen!
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV
He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV
Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4a02/d4a0242b3d1d4ec6d6af2055ff037ad6d71769ba" alt="Old"
05-30-2008, 08:40 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e3a8/9e3a8d3b6cf70ad414f31ae43197cadf4d0dafd3" alt="Cindy's Avatar" |
Forever Loved Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
|
|
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoman
For the record, I find it perfectly acceptable if a women chooses to wear only dresses. I admire their personal conviction and sacrifice.
The problem arises when they judge others by their own personal convictions. They separate themselves from other women of like faith that may not have the same convictions.
|
Good post PM, I agree. And vice versa on the judging thing.
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV
He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV
Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:53 AM.
| |