More on Skirts

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by n david

Meanwhile, there's nothing in scripture which says they did not. And around and around we go!

Classic argument from silence.
Nowhere in scripture did a godly woman wear pants.

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by Aquila

One must remember that in biblical times, clothing for males and females was different only in styles and details, not in kind. While it undoubtedly is true that God wants some sexual distinction apparent in men’s and women’s garments, it is not legitimate to say that all women’s “pants” are wrong, or, for that matter, that Scottish “kilts” are sinful for the men of that culture.

Yep... Aquila wears the dress and his wife wears the pants...

Deu. 22:5 is clear. Women are not to wear clothes that pertain to men.
Biblically, godly men wore pants. Godly women did not.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Pliny

Yep... Aquila wears the dress and his wife wears the pants...

Deu. 22:5 is clear. Women are not to wear clothes that pertain to men.
Biblically, godly men wore pants. Godly women did not.

Um, son... I actually wear the pants in my family. And they aint the pretty little pink one's that you insist pertain to you.

If you wear a pretty pink pair of ladies jeans, and prance all around your favorite little church, you're in violation of Deuteronomy 22:5 because you are wearing that which pertains to a woman. If you wear a pretty pink dress, and prance all around you favorite little church, you're in violation of Deuteronomy 22:5. PERIOD. END OF SUBJECT. PROVEN.

Now, let me hear you argue as to why you should be able to wear petty pink ladies pants because they supposedly pertain to you.

It's common sense.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pliny

Please demonstrate where I done anything you are accusing me of. If you can't then you are mistaken or just plain lying. But hey, I am glad you are not "arguing the issue" LOL!

Please show where I accused you, specifically, of doing such.

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by n david

Deu 22:5 isn't about pants.

Originally Posted by n david

""Deu. 22:5 is about what men and women wear. Sorry you cannot see the obvious.""

Sooo... according to you, pants are not worn?

And you imply I cannot see the obvious?

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pliny

Sooo... according to you, pants are not worn?

And you imply I cannot see the obvious?

That's a neat trick. Incredibly dishonest, but neat trick. I was quoting you in that post.

Originally Posted by Pliny

Deu. 22:5 is about what men and women wear. Sorry you cannot see the obvious.

You should really learn and start breaking posts into separate quotes, instead of inserting your comments inside the original quote, making it a pain to quote your posts.

[Aquila]

It is written:

Deuteronomy 22:5 (KJV)
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.

Both of these articles of clothing pertain to a woman. Any man would be in violation of the above text if he were to wear either one.

It's common sense.

[Aquila]

It is written,

Deuteronomy 22:5 (KJV)
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.

On the flip side, both of these articles of clothing pertain to a man. Any woman would be in violation of the above text if she were to wear either one.

It's common sense.

[Aquila]

Now, that's not to say that it is just okay for a woman to go all out wearing pants with all abandon. A Christian woman should dedicate her life to living a life of modesty. And that means that she seeks modest forms of style and attire regardless as to if she wears pants or not.

1 Timothy 2:9-10 (KJV)
In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Um, son... I actually wear the pants in my family. And they aint the pretty little pink one's that you insist pertain to you.

If you wear a pretty pink pair of ladies jeans, and prance all around your favorite little church, you're in violation of Deuteronomy 22:5 because you are wearing that which pertains to a woman. If you wear a pretty pink dress, and prance all around you favorite little church, you're in violation of Deuteronomy 22:5. PERIOD. END OF SUBJECT. PROVEN.

Now, let me hear you argue as to why you should be able to wear petty pink ladies pants because they supposedly pertain to you.

It's common sense.

I'm not your son.
You STILL have not demonstrated where a godly women wore pants. Please try the Bible and try again.

Thank you