Quote:
Originally Posted by timlan2057
Oh, so he's a Catholic so that AUTOMATICALLY makes everything he says invalid?
Why not deal with his material point-by-point?
Interesting reasoning. 
Frankly, just one minor point of his I thought interesting, she supposedly went "anonymous" because she was afraid those big, bad Catholics would get her.
But yet, she went public with her "testimony" with open meetings like Billy Graham, in spirit if not in number.
All an assassin would have to do is show up at one of her meetings.
If the Catholic church was as menacing as the Mafia they are portrayed as, with their unlimited funds, the FBI's witness protection program couldn't have helped that woman.
Everything I've read about this "Sister Charlotte" leads me to conclude she was a brass-plated fraud.  |
Guess you're entitled to think this woman was a "brass-plated fraud".
That was my point of the so called rebuttal to her testimony. The person writing it had an obvious pro-catholic bias, so unless you can come up with someone who doesn't have an ax to grind then I'd like to read that point of view. And hopefully with some actual facts that you think are so sorely missing in her testimony.
Threaded Mode
