The Hubris behind "The Full Truth"

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

No, of course his schtick isn't poorly written blogs. The verbose nature of the blog, the long end-arounds, etc are sort of the personality of the blog. Reading this blog on-and-off over time would show that. The criteria you pointed to as "6th grader" level writing is likely being perceived in the wrong way. But such as it is, you are not representative likely of the blogs audience, it's not your thing, so you are free to your opinion. If this were a paper on his summer vacation or his favorite hobby, my only critique would be both the verbosity and the lack of brevity. However, understanding the blog and blogger, and enjoying his set-up, I find it to be a wonderfully written blog. He sets up some of the same arguments we have discussed on here, but with a broader context. For example, arguing that Apostolic Identity and claims of full truth are more tied to Ego than they are to anything else is something one can't just claim. He argued it. It's a classic persuasive argument.

ah