Quote:
Originally Posted by rdp
And are also referenced in connection w/ his fall. Honestly, it's beyond me how we can argue about the devil as support of jewelry!
|
*rolls eyes*
We aren't "arguing about the devil in support of jewelry." Quit with your STRAW MAN arguments (ahem LOGICAL FALLACIES hahah).
We are arguing that Lucifer, the chiefest angel of the Lord, was decked, we presume by the Creator of all things, with gold and jewels, which tells us that God doesn't have a axe to grind with jewelry in itself. Because Lucifer later fell doesn't mean anything to the price of tea in China. Just as it didn't that he was beautiful, musical, etc.... You make absolutely no sense.
Threaded Mode
