Holiday Wishes for Obama

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by n david

I corrected the "excrement" statement. It wasn't blatant, it was unintentional and was corrected immediately when I saw the error.

The NLT/paraphrase thing is your problem. I posted a link directly to the NLT website which states they used paraphrase with the new bible. Don't complain to me about what their website says, write them. You want me to get their contact info for you?

Your "dirt" on Danny -- some dumb letter written by an "annonymous" person who spends most of the letter bashing Danny's church and all of one paragraph, or 3 sentences, complaining about Danny's leadership. Oh, and yah there was one very, very brief mention that he flirted with the girls on the worship team.

When I pointed this out you suddenly developed the urge to retract your statments and not want to go further with it.

As for Kris, you make a baseless statement on some allegation. No source, no proof, nothing.

If anything doesn't add up, it's these baseless accusations against Danny and Kris, which you even admitted to bringing up as a way to deflect criticism of your mancrush Adam Lambert ... then you stated regret for doing so.










Pretty straight forward ...


Intentions to support gay rights and marriage. There is an added "even if it be freedoms I disagree with."


Here's the kicker. Praying those who do have gay rights and marriage are happy and "find You [God]."

It's a gay friendly prayer. No mention of right or wrong. Very ambiguous, politically correct.


Right to choose? Not the property of the US Gov't, sure. But she does belong to God. The choice was made before the moment of conception, when she committed the act. After that, it's no longer a choice.


It ends on a nice note, prayer that they choose life. But it's still a morally ambiguous prayer that says nothing of right and wrong, and even states emphatically that the woman should have a right to choose.

I stand by my analysis. I didn't twist or misquote. It's there. At best it's a politically correct, morally ambiguous prayer. No right or wrong. It's okay as long as the intention is pure.

Makes me want to

I don't even wanna read all that gobbledy-gook right now. I'll look at it later. But two quick things:

1) The NLT website DOES NOT say that. You are deliberately and completely misrepresenting what they say. Either that or you're unable to understand the clear english language writings on the site. There isn't a single legitimate translation critic who considers the NLT a paraphrase. Your amateurish, slanted, biased opinion is worthless.

2) "I also pray that those who he empowers choose life." And you're saying this prayer is pro-abortion? Is your elevator broken??? It's clearly not going to the top floor. Just this statement alone "that he prayed a perverted prayer that supports abortion", discredits everything you say. It's like standing with you beside a blue wall and you're arguing that it's red. I'm not even sure what to say.