Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > The Newsroom > Political Talk
Facebook

Notices

Political Talk Political News


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 07-16-2009, 09:59 AM
Twisp's Avatar
Twisp Twisp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,754
Re: Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by Newman View Post
Twisp- I would like to understand your position. Do you believe:

1. The document (original image) released on the internet was real?
The document Obama released was real, not imaginary. It was also valid.

2. The document (paper document) that the reporters handled was real?
They did handle a real document.
3. The original image and the paper document were the same?
As far as I can tell.
4. The document shown is sufficient proof of Hawaiin birth even if Hawaii allows for foreign births to documented this way; although the original birth certificate still shows foreign birth?
By itself, I believe it lends credence, if not sufficient evidence, to Hawaiian birth. When coupled with the fact that Hawaiian officials have validated having his birth certificate, along with two birth announcements in local newspapers on the day he was born, I think it is sufficient proof. More importantly, the process one goes through to run for the office of President concluded he is of American citizenship.
5. Obama was born in Hawaii? Or it is irrelevant where he was born?
He was born in Hawaii. It is not irrelevant where he was born.

I would also seek to understand your mindset.

6. Did you vote for Obama?
I voted for Ron Paul in the Primaries, Obama in the Presidential Election.
7. If so, would you vote for him again?
Hard to say at this point. Depending on who he is running against, I probably would. I do hold the viewpoint, however, that the different between Republicans and Democrats is minute. Both parties are out of touch with the common man, and are chiefly concerned with bigger government.
8. Are you troubled by his many evil associations? If not, why?
I am not as troubled by his many evil associates as are others. One man's evil is another man's shady. One man's associates are another man's acquaintance.
9. Do you agree with dismantling capitalism?
No.
10. Are you employed by the goverment?
No. Neither is my wife.
11. Do you belong to a union?
I do not. My father-in-law does. He calls them "organized gangsters", but is happy with them money they pay him. He does say his union has changed a lot from when he first started working for them.
THANK YOU for helping me to understand how you see things.
No problem.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obama's Supreme Court pick... Baron1710 Political Talk 88 06-16-2009 03:13 PM
Stupid Lawsuit Get Supreme Court Conference deacon blues Political Talk 14 12-06-2008 12:08 AM
Craziness in Canadian Supreme Court Pro31:28 Fellowship Hall 1 06-26-2008 07:01 PM
Gun law struck down by Supreme Court Baron1710 Fellowship Hall 17 06-26-2008 11:02 AM
Texas Supreme Court vindicates pastor Pressing-On The Newsroom 3 07-09-2007 12:41 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.