Yeah prax I know. Mention of alters is distasteful to christians. Regular prayers are distasteful to christians. Scheduled fasting is distasteful to christians. Mandatory giving is distasteful to christians.
Got all those points a long time ago.
But not earlier. Earlier
you said I said that christians
DESPISE these things. Now, you are saying "distasteful" probably because I was gonna clear it up and nail you on it anyway.
Which I clearly phrased in terms of Islamic beliefs with "regular" prayers (shall I copy and paste your comments on
REGULARly scheduled prayers or shall we agree that you find this concept distasteful?) and
SCHEDULED fasting (shall I copy and paste your comments on scheduled fasting or shall we agree that you find this concept distasteful) and
MANDATORY giving (shall I copy and paste your comments on mandatory giving (tithing) or shall we agree that you find this concept distasteful?). Do you actually
want your stuttering and backpeddling discussions on alters and their significance reposted here? lol
Now - Just WHO used the word DESPISE in that convo anyway? Let me see.....it was on
tithing / mandatory giving.
PRAX:
You finally got one right. We despise the idea of giving by force.
I did
NOT use the word despise.
You did. But
if I had, then by your own words I would have actually been
correct. Not only do you flat put words in my mouth - you put YOUR words. YOUR words in MY mouth leave a bad taste. (aka they are distasteful lol)
The goat was out of line. So was comparing the kabaa cornerstone to a female body part. So was joking with your buddy tom trini about my newborn daughter being a "future terrorist". Whatever you got in return you earned fairly. So come in here with something new and fresh and intelligent because you've already demonstrated what a
<redacted> lol on you can be in other places.
Thank you for saving me the time to go get that little blurb from the other forum by the way. I forgot it was there and you are building concrete pillars and arches over my case that
you tend to deviate just a bit in your (re)-interpretation of words and what words actually say or said. When you deviate in speech you violate that little scripture I shared with you. This is the end that is spelled out for those who deviate from the truth (ALL of them, even the pentecostal ones who do so) in speech.
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
NOTE: When your pentecostal kids are not groping each other in lazer-tag in front of my 8 and 10 year old then they will not earn you a comment. When they do earn you a comment try not to take it so personally. It's the internet prax.
Thank you for your invitation to a pentecostal prayer meeting. I guess it was an invitation. No wonder your ranks are thinning lol
Well tell you what, if you come back to the states call up a local Pentecostal church and ask when they have their prayer meetings and go join them while you pray to Allah.
I stand by my response to your "invitation" and will re-post that one too
We have a much, much more conservative and stricter lifestyle and regimen to follow than you ever will
Why would I choose to pray among those who deviate from the truth in their speech Prax?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
I didn't rephrase a single thing. I said YOU said that we Christians find stuff like prayer and fasting "distasteful" and that you precipitated my comments on the "goat"
Then I commented that if you visited a Pentecostal church and ask about their prayer meetings you'd see whether or not we find it distasteful. Then you, again, precipitated my later comments by talking about Pentecostal kids groping one another. My comments were precipitated by yours
|
Threaded Mode
