Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
Yes I see your point, after re-reading Dordrecht's post it does seem to be confrontational toward Sherri's original post.
I guess you could look at it this way - "Sherri, the ex-UPCer is gossiping and spreading scandalous tales about someone and won't even back it up..."
That's kind of the take I get from Dordrecht. The problem is: The blog is also from an "exUPCer" -so anything Sherri may say would be self deprecatory as she herself has indicated by her title selection.
So, the real "scandal" appears to be that Sherri is concerned about gossips gossiping about "exUPCers" in general and the "bad name" that gets hung on people. Hardly a scandal, in my opinion.
So we're back to the real problem: there is apparently an audience that wishes to read the "exUPC" pastor's wife's blog's PG-17 language and that audience has no material to read. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28f0d/28f0d640c9a9f48b120bcb39350bffacb9538baa" alt=""
|
I did not even know about Sherri being an exUPC'er.
My concern is about gossip without proof.
But I tell you that men will have to give account on the day of judgment for every careless word they have spoken.